Nuclear “deterrence” does not make us safer
the claim that a nuclear deterrent makes us feel safer, seems, to put it plainly, bollocks.
(UK) Who’s afraid of the nuclear bomb?The debate over Trident has sparked differing reactions between the cold war and 9/11 generations – but why? Richard Rogers * guardian.co.uk, 28 April 2010 “….Back in the UK, the nation watched as Nick Clegg made the Lib Dems’ case for reviewing the replacement of Trident – arguing for the need to look for a cheaper alternative or possibly, just possibly, even abandon an independent nuclear deterrent for Britain completely……….
the claim that a nuclear deterrent makes us feel safer, seems, to put it plainly, bollocks. After an afternoon watching archived Protect and Survive films I can begin to see why. These are chilling reminders of a different age, beginning with the image of a family silhouetted against a mushroom cloud and including lines such as: “A warning may come quite unexpectedly. Fall out can kill, though you cannot see it, feel it or smell it. There is danger outside.” Who’s afraid of the nuclear bomb? | Richard Rogers | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk
No comments yet.
Leave a Reply
-
Archives
- May 2012 (262)
- April 2012 (259)
- March 2012 (342)
- February 2012 (304)
- January 2012 (259)
- December 2011 (274)
- November 2011 (331)
- October 2011 (247)
- September 2011 (272)
- August 2011 (249)
- July 2011 (227)
- June 2011 (195)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- people
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety and incidents
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina background info
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- general
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS












