Institute for Government 2nd Feb 2018, The Nuclear Safeguards Bill may not protect the UK’s nuclear industry
after Brexit. While the Nuclear Safeguards Bill is an important step
towards avoiding a regulatory gap for the UK’s nuclear industry https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/blog/nuclear-safeguard-bill-brexit
Eskom: the power giant at the core of S.Africa’s state rot, by Philippe ALFROY/AFP
The name of Eskom, Africa’s largest electricity company, has become synonymous with the worst corruption scandals in South Africa and the utility could well become the final nail in the political coffin of President Jacob Zuma.
The sacking of yet another of its short-lived CEOs this week and the release of dire financial results confirmed the depth of the crisis plaguing the power utility.
Dr. Adetunji Toriola is an epidemiologist at Siteman Cancer Center. He breaks down what effect radiation exposure may have on health:
“Exposure to radiation can cause some cancers, Leukemia is one, thyroid cancer is another one, and bone cancer is another one,” hes says.
Radon exposure, he says, is associated with respiratory diseases such as asthma and bronchitis, as well as lung cancer. Cancer risk associated with radiation, he says, varies depending on the length and proximity of the exposure.
Former national monuments shrunk by Trump to be opened for mining claims
Presidential order reduced protections for land once part of Utah’s Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante monuments, Guardian, Alastair Gee , 2 Feb 18,
Hundreds of thousands of acres of land that were part of two US national monuments shrunk by Donald Trump are being opened on Friday to mining claims for uranium and other minerals.
It is a symbolic step in a broader conflict over the fate of America’s public lands, on which Trump hopes to encourage greater access for extractive industries.
His proclamation judged that large portions of the monuments were not unique or of particular scientific or historic interest, a point fiercely contested by environmentalists, Native American groups and scientists, who have brought five lawsuits.
On February 4, 2004, the Pakistani scientist Abdul Qadeer (A.Q.) Khan, then famous for his role in developing Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal, confessed on live television to having illegally proliferated nuclear weapons technology to Iran, Libya, and North Korea over the course of decades. Today Khan is enjoying a resurrection at home, where he is again touted as the “Mohsin e-Pakistan,” or the savior of Pakistan. He appears as the guest of honor at official ceremonies, and last year Sir Syed University of Engineering and Technology declared him a distinguished alumnus in recognition of his “meritorious services and valuable contributions towards scientific research and its practical application for the productive use for mankind.”
Outside of Pakistan, Khan has largely been forgotten, despite the fact that his fingerprints are all over the world’s most volatile nuclear hot spots. Indeed, three of the United States’ most significant national security challenges—Iran, North Korea, and Pakistan—are largely the results of Khan’s handiwork.
Between the start of Khan’s nuclear black market in the mid-1970s and his forced confession in 2004, the United States and other countries had many opportunities to stop him. Yet each time, policymakers decided that preventing the spread of nuclear weapons was less important than pursuing other foreign policy goals. These decisions haunt U.S. leaders today. Pakistan’s nuclear deterrent makes it impossible for U.S. commanders to force the country to close its safe havens for Afghan extremists. Iran’s nuclear program—though frozen for now—could still lead to a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. And North Korea, which Khan helped turn from a thorn in the world’s side into an unstable nuclear power, now threatens the lives of millions.
How were Khan’s activities allowed to continue for so long? And what lessons might the failures to contain him hold for policymakers today?
GOING NUCLEAR
Born in British India in 1936, Khan…. (subscribers only)
Trump is leading us into nuclear war, says Daniel Ellsberg (and he should know, he used to plan them) The Current CBC Radio 1 Feb 18 A “Doomsday Machine” has loomed over humanity for decades, according to the man who once helped U.S. presidents plan for nuclear war.
Far more people still have access to launch codes than the public realize, he said, and it is only through luck that we avoided nuclear winter.
Not only does that threat still exist, but for the first time since the Cuban missile crisis, “an American president is threatening imminent attack on a nuclear-weapons state,” he said. “On a state that can retaliate with nuclear weapons.”
“I think there’s a very significant chance — I would say better than even — that this president does mean to launch some kind of an attack on North Korea,” he said, “that will lead to a response that will then cause a two-sided nuclear war.”
“It would kill millions of people in the first day or week, which would be more violence than the human species has ever seen in a day or week.”
“I think nothing at this moment is of higher importance than there not be a war with North Korea.”
The whistleblower’s dilemma
Ellsberg, 86, was the whistleblower who revealed the Pentagon Papers, the secret history of the Vietnam War that eventually led to the Watergate scandal and the fall of President Richard Nixon.
COLUMBIA — The South Carolina House is set to take up legislation this week that could replace the state’s seven utility regulators while the Senate slowly begins to respond to the state’s nuclear fiasco.
Four weeks after returning to Columbia, the legislative agenda continues to revolve around the cancellation of the V.C. Summer project in Fairfield County, which saddled the state with a $9 billion tab for two useless nuclear reactors.
Nearly Half of Hunters Point Shipyard Radiation Cleanup in Question; Contractor Possibly Faked Data, NBC Bay Area, Navy review finds “inconsistencies” in cleanup contractor’s radiation data and says a good portion of it is likely fraudulent. By Liz Wagner, 31 Jan 18,
The Navy has decided to retest all of the Hunters Point Shipyard for radiation after losing confidence in Tetra Tech, the contractor it hired to clean up contamination.
A yearlong review of Tetra Tech’s radiation data by Navy consultants found that nearly half of it may have been faked. The consultants found inconsistencies in Tetra Tech’s test results and the Navy said that a good portion of it is likely fraudulent.
The revelations are the latest setback for the shipyard, the superfund site along San Francisco’s southeastern waterfront that’s slated for major redevelopment, including homes, parks and shops.
The Navy awarded Tetra Tech at least $300 million in taxpayer dollars to rid the shipyard of radiological contamination left over from Cold War era-radiation experiments. Tetra Tech spent 12 years on the project, but half of the cleanup is now in question.
“That data that’s been collected over 12 years we lost confidence in,” said Derek Robinson, the Navy’s cleanup coordinator for Hunters Point. “It’s a big deal.”
Tetra Tech declined to comment, referring all questions to the Navy.
At the onset of the cleanup more than a decade ago, Navy officials divided the 900 acre shipyard into separate parcels. On several parcels, up to 67 percent of the cleanup data may have been falsified. That means some of Hunters Point could still be contaminated with radiation.
NUCLEAR FAR FROM A DONE DEAL – ENERGY EXPERT http://ewn.co.za/2018/01/30/nuclear-far-from-a-done-deal-energy-expert Deputy president Cyril Ramaphosa, who is next in line to lead the country, told reporters at the World Economic Forum that South Africa can’t afford to build a nuclear plant.Gia Nicolaides | 31 Jan 18, JOHANNESBURG – Deputy president Cyril Ramaphosa‘s remarks about South Africa not having money for nuclear power may halt plans for now, but some experts say that this depends on decisions taken in the next few months by the new political leadership.
Ramaphosa, who is next in line to lead the country, told reporters at the World Economic Forum that South Africa can’t afford to build a nuclear plant.
This differs from President Jacob Zuma’s approach, who has pushed to build as many as eight reactors worth around R1 trillion.
Energy expert Chris Yelland had a meeting at the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS) on Monday.
“A representative of the Department of Energy spoke and he indicated that the officials at the DoE are in a state of limbo with the change in political leadership at the ANC and perhaps even a Cabinet reshuffle. Nuclear is far from a done deal.”
However, the Coalition Against Nuclear Energy’s Mike Kantey says that when it comes to affordability a deal can always be made.
“There’ve been a few deals around the world – Turkey and also in Egypt – where what they talk about is a build, own and operate model, where the payback is over 35 years at a specific rate. So, money can be found. Our problem with all of this is that it defies the logic of renewable energy.”
EGEB: New renewables cheaper than old coal/nuclear, Jersey applying carbon tax, heterojunction solar cells from Russia, more, Electrek, John Fitzgerald Weaver– Jan. 30th 2018
Utility CEO: new renewables will be cheaper than existing coal plants by the early 2020s – Unsubsidized new wind: 2.0-2.5 cents per kilowatt-hour/Unsubsidized new solar: 3.0-4.0 cents per kilowatt-hour/Variable operating costs of existing coal or nuclear plants: 3.5-5.0 cents per kilowatt-hour. Let me point out a few key phrases in this proclamation: New renewables, existing coal/nuclear– That means building new hardware, from the ground up, is cheaper than using old hardware. And then the kicker, unsubsidized. Of course, this is before we start to consider the subsidies that fossil fuels get – free pollution.
New Tariffs to Curb US Solar Installations by 11% Through 2022 – Utility-scale solar will take the brunt of the impact, accounting for 65 percent of the anticipated 7.6-gigawatt decline. 2019 is expected to be the most painful year for the utility-scale sector, with a 1.6-gigawatt decline in installations compared to GTM Research’s original forecast. The new analysis shows that new and emerging state solar markets are disproportionately affected by the tariffs, with Southern states like Texas, Florida and South Carolina among the most significantly impacted by the tariffs. The logic I wanted to show here is that people are going to buy solar at a certain price, and this logic is based upon past data. Utility scale groups build based upon small differences in pricing, but they’re getting hit the most with this tax due to their broader efficiency. And states that have no environmental laws and little solar support – Texas/Florida – are also getting hacked just as they get going.
ANDY BRACK: What really needs to happen with General Assembly’s nuclear mess, South Carolina Now, ANDY BRACK Statehouse Report, 28 Jan 18
Until state legislators go through the five stages of grief over the $9 billion failure of building two nuclear reactors, they might just screw up things worse.
It’s easy to see where they are, so far, six months after the announcement by Santee Cooper and SCANA that the project in Fairfield County wouldn’t get off the ground, despite ratepayers paying more for power over the last 10 years.
First is the denial stage – that it couldn’t happen here. Evidence of this is the prodigious finger-pointing as everybody and his brother look for scapegoats.
Next comes anger. There’s still a lot of anger bubbling inside the capitol and among voters who are irritated by the waste of what’s happened. Anger comes in many forms, but often is seen in unrealistic calls to make everything better and send lots of people to jail. And politicians, scared for their hides, are shamelessly exploiting anger on a daily basis.
The third stage is bargaining, in which some lawmakers are rushing pell-mell to pass bills that try to fix problems in an attempt to negotiate away the pain caused by the failure. Slow down.
Fourth is depression. Often when one reaches this part of the grieving process, it reflects how a problem seems overwhelming and hard to cope with. But it also may start the process of trying to deal with a loss realistically, instead of development of quick responses fueled by anger.
Finally, there’s acceptance. It involves learning to live with what happened and being smart about dealing with it.
Folks, the state legislature isn’t there yet. Why? Because it hasn’t accepted responsibility that it is complicit in the chain of events that created a $9 billion eyesore that likely will become an enduring monument to failure and futility.
What the legislature needs to do now, more than rushing to pass legislation to fix what’s happened, is to apologize and take responsibility for the whole mess. Had legislators not passed the Base Load Review Act a decade ago, utilities wouldn’t have been able to charge ratepayers in advance to pay for the nuclear project.
This is not to let SCANA and Santee Cooper off the hook for cost overruns and apparent all-around mismanagement of the V.C. Summer construction project, but it’s to emphasize that the General Assembly needs to clean up its own house on the nuclear mess before resorting to solutions that could actually make things even worse…….. http://www.scnow.com/opinion/columns/article_4780ecd6-02f6-11e8-bc14-f3638c5f8137.html
BY ANNETTE CARY acary@tricityherald.com, January 26, 2018, The late July day was hot, dry and windy. But the training with live ammunition at the Yakima Training Center went ahead as usual.
A gunner fired at a target and the burst of ammunition ricocheted onto the ridge line, sparking a fire that spread across 275 square miles and threatened the Hanford nuclear reservation, according to a lawsuit filed this week in federal court…..http://www.tri-cityherald.com/news/local/crime/article196986384.html
U.S. WAR WITH NORTH KOREA WOULD BE ‘REALLY TOUGH’ TO WIN, SAYS TOP MARINE, NewsWeek, BY TOM O’CONNORThe commander of the U.S. Marine Corps warned about the realities of getting into a war with North Korea, a militarized state that vowed to continue developing nuclear and ballistic weapons despite international pressure.
Addressing the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, four-star Marine Corps General Robert Neller said Thursday that the U.S. military was already preparing for a potential conflict with the armed forces of Kim Jong Un, who last year successfully launched intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and declared his country a nuclear state. Neller said that such a fight would likely be the most daunting challenge his troops have ever faced………
Ecowatch 22nd Jan 2018, A reported public financing deal between the UK and Japanese governments for a new nuclear plant in Anglesey, Wales, could set the UK government up to provide state-support for a raft of nuclear projects hit by financial difficulties.
Antony Froggatt, a senior research fellow in energy at Chatham House, told Unearthed that the Conservatives were shifting their policy because new nuclear plants are unlikely to come online without significant state backing. “What we’re seeing, and this has been the case for the last 5-10 years, is that the Conservatives have gradually been salami slicing away at their pledge to allow the construction of new nuclear, provided that they ‘receive no public subsidy’,” he said. “There’s been a shift on this because nuclear can’t happen without significant government financial support.” https://www.ecowatch.com/nuclear-plants-uk-2527676949.html
This is the West Country 22nd Jan 2018, DRAMATIC new drone footage shows Europe’s biggest building site – where a
new nuclear power plant is being constructed by 3,000 workers every day.
Hinkley Point C will be the most expensive man-made object on Earth when it
is finished. The EDF Energy site will generate enough electricity for 5.8
million homes and is costing £19.6 billion to build. http://www.thisisthewestcountry.co.uk/news/somerset_news/15889340._/