Trump weighs highly-complex military plan to fly special ops forces into Iran’s nuclear facility and seize enriched uranium
JAMES GORDON, US NEWS REPORTER , Daily Mail, 30 March 2026
President Donald Trump is weighing a highly complex and potentially explosive military operation to send US special operations forces deep inside Iran to seize its stockpile of enriched uranium.
The move could drag American troops into hostile territory for days – or even a week – and risk a dramatic escalation of the war. It was reportedly one of many being proposed by the Pentagon.
US officials say the stealth plan would target nearly 1,000 pounds of uranium at either one or two nuclear sites in Natanz and Isfahan.
The objective would be to remove the radioactive substance entirely from Iranian control, eliminating any pathway to a nuclear weapon.
The proposal remains under review, and Trump has not signed off on it. But officials told The Wall Street Journal he is seriously considering the option, even as advisers warn of the dangers to American forces and the possibility of a broader conflict.
Military experts say the operation would be among the most difficult missions the US could undertake.
American forces would likely need to fly into heavily defended territory, potentially under fire from Iranian air defenses and drones, before securing the nuclear sites believed to house the material.
Once on the ground, combat troops would be tasked with locking down the perimeter while specialist teams locate, secure and prepare the uranium for transport.
‘This is not a quick in and out kind of deal,’ retired Gen. Joseph Votel, a former commander of U.S. Central Command and U.S. Special Operations Command, told the Journal about the potential mission.
Officials say the uranium is believed to be stored in multiple hardened locations, including underground facilities such as those at Isfahan and Natanz – sites that have already been targeted in previous strikes.
The military buildup already underway underscores how seriously the option is being considered.
Several hundred US special operations troops – including Army Rangers and Navy SEALs – have arrived in the region, according to The New York Times, joining thousands of Marines and Army paratroopers.
The commandos have not yet been assigned specific missions, officials said, but could be deployed across multiple flashpoints: safeguarding the Strait of Hormuz, assisting in a potential operation to seize Kharg Island, or taking part in a mission targeting Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.
Roughly 2,500 Marines and 2,500 sailors have recently arrived in the region, while about 2,000 troops from the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division have also been ordered in.
Altogether, more than 50,000 US troops are now positioned across the Middle East – about 10,000 more than usual – spread across bases and ships in countries including Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Iraq, Syria, Jordan, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait.
Despite the buildup, military analysts caution that even this expanded force would face enormous challenges if ordered into Iran.
Experts note that while special operations forces could conduct targeted missions, any sustained ground campaign in a country as large and heavily armed as Iran would require vastly larger troop numbers.
Behind the scenes, Trump has also instructed advisers to press Iran to hand over the material voluntarily as part of any negotiated end to the war.
According to a person familiar with his thinking, the president has made clear that Iran ‘can’t keep’ the uranium – and has discussed taking it by force if diplomacy fails.
During a recent speech, Trump underscored how central the material is to his strategy, calling it ‘the nuclear dust.’
At the same time, the White House has sought to emphasize that no final decision has been made.
……………………………………………………………….As Trump weighs his options, the Pentagon is rapidly positioning forces across the region.
Additional ground forces could be sent to further bolster capabilities, with officials saying up to 10,000 troops are under consideration for deployment………………………………………………………………………………………….
…………..I think we’ll make a deal with them, but it’s possible that we won’t,’ Trump continued. ‘I do see a deal in Iran. It could be soon.’
When asked by Libby Alon of Channel 14 Israel whether the US could take control of the Strait of Hormuz, Trump replied: ‘Yes, of course, it’s already happening.’………………………………
The strategically vital waterway, which serves as a conduit for roughly one-fifth of global oil supply, has been partially closed by Iran. The result has sent oil prices skyrocketing.
Trump also referred to the essential waterway as the ‘Strait of Trump,’ something he made a pointed joke about during a speech on Friday.
……………………………………..In a separate interview with the Financial Times, Trump went even further – openly discussing seizing Iran’s oil infrastructure.
‘To be honest with you, my favorite thing is to take the oil in Iran but some stupid people back in the US say: “Why are you doing that?”, But they’re stupid people,’ he said.
Trump specifically pointed to Kharg Island, through which most of Iran’s oil exports flow, as a potential target.
‘Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t. We have a lot of options,’ he said. ‘It would also mean we had to be there [on Kharg Island] for a while.’
Asked about Iranian defenses on the oil-rich island, Trump added: ‘I don’t think they have any defense. We could take it very easily.’
…………………………He has set an April 6 deadline for Tehran to accept a deal – or face strikes on its energy sector.
‘We’ve got about 3,000 targets left – we’ve bombed 13,000 targets – and another couple of thousand targets to go,’ Trump said. ‘A deal could be made fairly quickly.’…………………………………………………………………………………………………….
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15690253/Trump-special-ops-Iran-nuclear-uranium.html
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- April 2026 (34)
- March 2026 (251)
- February 2026 (268)
- January 2026 (308)
- December 2025 (358)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (376)
- September 2025 (257)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS




Leave a comment