Non corporate-nuclear-military-politics-media-complex news this week

Some bits of good news –
Nations hatched a plan to abandon fossil fuels
Rewilding in Scotland‘s Highlands
Crop yields soar thanks to solar panels.
The Nationwide Movement Turning Guns into Garden Tools.
TOP STORIES.
The Nuclear Cult.
Confronting The Media’s Gaza Group-Think.
Security Council Shamefully Grants Colonial Domination Over Palestine to the US.
Nuclear’s Costly Comeback Meets Harsh Market Reality.
What? Peace in Our Time in Ukraine? Zelensky to Trump on US peace plan: ‘No peace with Russia till we win back all lost territory’– ALSO AT…… https://nuclear-news.net/2025/11/25/3-a-zelensky-to-trump-on-us-peace-plan-no-peace-with-russia-till-we-win-back-all-lost-territory/
From the archives. Millions of fish killed this winter at Bruce Power nuclear plant
Climate. Beyond the negative headlines, some truly good things came out of Cop30. How the United Nations has under-predicted the rate of global temperature rise.
‘It’s like arguing with robots’: negotiators on the state of Cop30 talks. COPout 30 Backpedals on Climate Action. Fossil Fuels at COP30: Sacred, Profane and Unmentioned.
AUSTRALIA Water is under pressure in the Great Artesian Basin – ALSO AT https://antinuclear.net/2025/11/23/water-is-under-pressure-in-the-great-artesian-basin/
Nuke Submarine ‘community consultation’ PORT ADELAIDE COMMUNITY OPPOSING AUKUS (PACOA)SUBMISSION TO ANI CONSULTATION.
Michael West Media scoops the prize pool in the 2025 Walkey Awards-(SATIRE)
NUCLEAR TOPICS
ART and CULTURE. Palestinians Will Not Let the Genocide Kill Their Hopes: The Forty-Seventh Newsletter (2025).
| ATROCITIES. UN Condemns ‘Brazen’ Israeli Killing of Surrendering Palestinians in West Bank –https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZjnVw_fyLU Trump Gaza Plan Condemned as ‘Concentration Camps Within a Mass Concentration Camp’. Over 92 Percent of Homes in Gaza Are Rubble– How Do We Even Start Rebuilding? Thanks to US, in Gaza it’sdeath by a thousand planes. When medics become targets: Ukrainian strikes on Russian rescue workers and the silence of western media. |
| ECONOMICS. Hinkley Point C nuclear power station will add £1bn a year to energy bills -ALSO AT https://nuclear-news.net/2025/11/29/3-a-hinkley-point-c-nuclear-power-station-will-add-1bn-a-year-to-energy-bills/ UK ‘most expensive’ in the world for nuclear projects due to complex regulation, taskforce finds. UK Energy bills to rise to pay for nuclear plant and discount scheme. Trump’s Westinghouse nuclear deal comes with unresolved questions. |
| EDUCATION. Torness Power Station welcomes female school pupils. |
| EMPLOYMENT. Fears raised that specialist Vulcan MoD work could shift to Sellafield |
| ENERGY. We must embrace reality with cheap green energy – ALSO AT https://nuclear-news.net/2025/11/28/2-b1-we-must-embrace-reality-with-cheap-green-energy/ The50-Year Wind Farm That Ended a Nuclear Myth. |
ENVIRONMENT. Attacking nature protections with fudged figures is not the solution to slow growth: rivers charity responds to Hinkley Point C report.
UK’s new nuclear body urges scrapping nature protections for new projects.
Does ‘fish disco’ show we’re dancing to the wrong tune on regulations? – ALSO EXTRACT AT https://nuclear-news.net/2025/11/27/1-b1-does-fish-disco-show-were-dancing-to-the-wrong-tune-on-regulations/
Officials make alarming discovery outside of shutdown nuclear facility: ‘Significant’.
New Mexico Environment Department Requires Los Alamos National Laboratory to Stop All Injection Operations into Regional Drinking Water Aquifer.
HEALTH. Minnesota’s aging nukes pose national threat. |
| LEGAL. Soldiers Must Disobey Unlawful Orders Under Trump — It’s Their Legal Duty. Leavitt Says “All” MilitaryOrders by Trump Must Be “Presumed to Be Legal”. |
| MEDIA. The Seven Richest Billionaires Are All Media Barons. Right-wing media praise Trump’s made-up excuses for war against Venezuela. International Uranium Film Festival 2025. The Unseen Battle: Why Access to Alternative Media is a Modern Necessity |
| OPPOSITION to NUCLEAR . Oldbury nuclear reactor plans spark safety concerns at Lydney meeting. |
| PERSONAL STORIES. He once said he was a genius: Now he wants to immortalise himself. How Does It Feel When Your City Is Destroyed? Marco Rubio: From ‘Perfect Little Puppet’ to Most Dangerous Man Alive. |
| POLITICS. The USA: A democracy on life support. UK government adds nuclear energy to sovereign green bond framework. Due to legal considerations UK government is now pausing its planned nuclear regulatory reforms. Sir Keir Starmer to create commission with power to overrule environmental regulators through environmental red tape- ALSO AT https://nuclear-news.net/2025/11/27/1-a-sir-keir-starmer-to-create- Labour’s nuclear tax to blame for rising energy bills, says Octopus says. Japan approves restart of world’s biggest nuclear power plant – ALSO AT https://nuclear-news.net/2025/11/24/3-b1-japan-approves-restart-of-worlds-biggest-nuclear-power-plant/ Ontario’s Nuclear Announcement Locks Us Into a High-cost, High-risk Energy Path, ‘Elbows up’ means ‘lots of things,’ Canada’s energy minister says after pressed on U.S.-based nuclear contract. |
| POLITICS INTERNATIONAL and DIPLOMACY. Trump’s Ukraine peace plan D.O.A with neocon Rubio as Secretary of State, National Security Advisor. Rubio Neo-Conned Trump’s Ukraine Peace Plan. Fighting for Peace and Fighting for War in Ukraine. “Ukraine Agrees on ‘Essence’ of Peace Deal; Trump Meeting Expected Soon”. The EU counter-proposal to Trump’s peace plan keeps the door ajar for Ukraine to join NATO. ZELENSKY: CAUGHT BETWEEN A ROCK AND A HARD PLACE. Press-hating president kisses up to press-murdering crown prince. From Libya to Palestine: The UN’s Betrayal Of Arabs and Muslims. European Leaders Condemn Trump’s Military Escalation Against Venezuela. China warns of severe consequences if Japan fails to retract its threats of military intervention over Taiwan. Stepping back from the brink-How the UK could help lead the world away from the nuclear precipice. Hiroshima Declaration and Declaration on the Rights of Nuclear Victims 2025/ China releases arms control white paper in new era; ‘document injects positive energy, safeguards developing nations’ rights. |
| PUBLIC OPINION. Poll Shows 70 Percent in US Disapprove of Striking Venezuela as Trump Mulls War. |
| RADIATION. Prawns, sneakers and spices: What we know about Indonesia’s radioactive exports. |
| SAFETY. Reservations over a dash for nuclear– UK’s “Nuclear Regulatory Taskforce”- ALSO AT https://nuclear-news.net/2025/11/29/2-b1-reservations-over-a-dash-for-nuclear-uks-nuclear-regulatory-taskforce/ Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant needs cooperation agreement in event of Ukraine peace, says IAEA. Incidents. Risks of Restarting Duane Arnold nuclear plan. Visiting bombed nuclear sites is dangerous, Iran FM says. |
| SECRETS AND LIES Navy’s legal threats in bid to try and and keep nuclear pollution secret. British military trained in Israel amid Gaza genocide. Were The Brits Behind Bloomberg’s Russian-US Leaks? Zelensky covering up ‘dire’ frontline situation – Moscow. Iranian nuclear scientists sell products with Croydon-made parts -ALSO AT https://nuclear-news.net/2025/11/28/2-b1-iranian-nuclear-scientists-sell-products-with-croydon-made-parts/ |
| TECHNOLOGY. Elon’s last grift. DARPA Going Hard on Insect-Sized Spy Robots. |
| WAR and CONFLICT.Video shows Israeli forces killing two Palestinian men after apparent surrender https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZjnVw_fyLU Israel is violating ceasefires in Gaza and Lebanon, and Trump is allowing it. The“Arsenal of Freedom” is a Dangerous Fantasy for Armchair Warriors. US military orders that should be disobeyed.From WMDs to “Narco-States”: How the US Sells Wars the Intelligence Doesn’t Support. |
| WEAPONS and WEAPONS SALES. Britain will have to obey US orders on nuclear jets, CND conference hears. The White House Ignored Legal Warnings—Now Latin America Faces Its Largest Military Buildup Since 1962. Israel accelerates production of Iron Dome with US aid money. |
Visiting bombed nuclear sites is dangerous, Iran FM says.

Nov 27, 2025, https://www.iranintl.com/en/202511276616
ran Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned on Wednesday that approaching nuclear sites hit in recent strikes is unsafe and said inspections there can only resume under new security arrangements.
“It is now dangerous to approach nuclear installations because of security issues,” Araghchi told France 24 in Paris. “There are unexploded munitions, and there are also concerns regarding radioactivity and chemical contamination.”
He said inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency continue at facilities that were not attacked, but access to damaged sites requires “a new framework and proper modalities.”
Araghchi called last week’s resolution by the IAEA’s 35-nation Board of Governors “a political and unilateral decision,” saying it ignored the reality that Iranian nuclear sites had been bombed. “If you do not include the realities on the ground, then you are committing an error,” he said.
The minister said the Cairo agreement reached earlier this year with IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi had acknowledged that conditions had changed after the attacks and that a new inspection protocol would be needed.
Further attacks possible
Asked whether more strikes could occur, Araghchi said Israel’s recent record suggested the risk remains. “The Israeli regime over the last two years has attacked seven different countries,” he said. “So it’s clear that another attack is possible.”
His comments came a day after IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi said in Manila that the agency wants to “fully reengage with Iran” to restore inspection access and verify enrichment activities. The IAEA’s 35-member Board of Governors last week passed a resolution calling on Tehran to inform it “without delay” about the status of its enriched uranium stock and sites hit in June’s strikes.
Iran condemned the vote as “illegal and unjustified,” saying it undermined the Cairo inspection accord that Grossi reached with Tehran in September through Egyptian mediation. Araghchi accused Western powers of “killing” that agreement, saying it had provided a framework for cooperation before Israel and the United States bombed enrichment facilities during the 12-day conflict in June.
No enrichment after attacks
Earlier this month, Araghchi said Iran was no longer enriching uranium at any site in the country, citing the destruction caused by the attacks. “There is no enrichment right now because our facilities — our enrichment facilities — have been attacked,” he said in response to a question from an Associated Press journalist at a conference in Tehran. “There is no undeclared nuclear enrichment in Iran. All of our facilities are under the safeguards and monitoring” of the IAEA.
Iran had previously enriched uranium up to 60% purity — just short of weapons-grade levels — after the United States withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal in 2018. Tehran says its atomic program is entirely peaceful.
Attacking nature protections with fudged figures is not the solution to slow growth: rivers charity responds to Hinkley Point C report

A statement from Mark Lloyd, Chief Executive of The Rivers Trust, https://envirotecmagazine.com/2025/11/26/attacking-nature-protections-with-fudged-figures-is-not-the-solution-to-slow-growth-rivers-charity-responds-to-hinkley-point-c-report/
Yesterday [(25 November)], several prominent newspapers published articles quoting a government-commissioned report into the spiralling costs of EDF’s Hinkley Point C nuclear power station. These articles focused on the report’s claims that a planned fish deterrent system for the power station’s water intakes cost £700m and would “save the lives of 0.083 salmon, 0.028 sea trout, six river lamprey, 18 Allis shad and 528 twaite shad per year”.
These figures, being used to deride the vital importance of the fish deterrent, cannot be taken seriously.
The fish deterrent system at Hinkley is in fact priced at £50m, not £700m. The tiny numbers of fish the report claims it would save are based on EDF’s own modelling, and are preposterously small given that 3.5bn litres of water a day will be sucked into the power station. This is more than the flow of all the rivers flowing into the Severn Estuary.
Such a vast amount of water will undoubtedly contain huge quantities of fish and other marine creatures, many of which are on the verge of extinction. The water intake at Hinkley will come from the most densely populated part of the estuary, killing not just fish but lots of other wildlife, and the knock-on effects on breeding would be catastrophically felt for generations. The abundance of species in the Severn Estuary and their vulnerability is why the area has the highest levels of protection in environmental law.
EDF included the fish deterrent system in the plans it submitted to get this project approved. Instead of disingenuously blaming spiralling construction costs on perfectly reasonable measures to reduce damage to the environment, EDF should honour its commitment. Within a total budget of £45bn to build a nuclear power station at Hinkley, £50m is little more than a rounding error.
This report seems to be another. Within a total budget of £45bn, £50m is little more than a rounding error, and this story is another ridiculous attempt to frame nature as the one and only blocker to growth and prosperity, a narrative that the government seems intent on pushing as we build up to today’s Budget.
The truth is that growth and prosperity are utterly dependent on the health of our natural world. Whilst we recognise the urgent need for new energy infrastructure, the processes being proposed to remove or bypass environmental protections should concern us all. Development and nature can thrive together, but only if the safeguards designed to protect our wildlife, and communities remain in place.
China releases arms control white paper in new era; ‘document injects positive energy, safeguards developing nations’ rights

Global Times By Liu Xuanzun and Guo Yuandan, : Nov 27, 2025
China’s State Council Information Office on Thursday released a white paper titled “China’s Arms Control, Disarmament, and Nonproliferation in the New Era.” An expert told the Global Times that at a time when the existing international arms control mechanisms are facing challenges, the white paper issued by China injects positive energy into the global arms control and nonproliferation process and fully safeguards the rights of developing countries.
Apart from the preface, conclusion, and annexes, the white paper has five sections: “Grim Realities: International Security and Arms Control,” “Position and Policies: China’s Arms Control in the New Era,” “Playing a Constructive Role in International Arms Control,” “Leading International Security Governance in Emerging Fields,” and “Strengthening International Cooperation on Nonproliferation and Peaceful Uses of Science and Technology.”
The white paper reiterated that China upholds a firm commitment to a policy of no-first-use of nuclear weapons and a nuclear strategy of self-defense. It said that China was compelled to make the strategic choice to develop nuclear weapons at a particular point in history to deal with nuclear threats and blackmail, break the existing nuclear monopoly, and prevent nuclear wars. China’s nuclear weapons are not intended to threaten other countries, but for defense and self-protection. China has never used nuclear weapons to threaten other countries nor deployed nuclear weapons outside its own territories, and has never provided a nuclear umbrella for other countries.

China releases arms control white paper in new era; ‘document injects positive energy, safeguards developing nations’ rights’
By
Liu Xuanzun and Guo YuandanPublished: Nov 27, 2025 10:25 PM
latest news
China’s State Council Information Office on Thursday released a white paper titled “China’s Arms Control, Disarmament, and Nonproliferation in the New Era.” An expert told the Global Times that at a time when the existing international arms control mechanisms are facing challenges, the white paper issued by China injects positive energy into the global arms control and nonproliferation process and fully safeguards the rights of developing countries.
Apart from the preface, conclusion, and annexes, the white paper has five sections: “Grim Realities: International Security and Arms Control,” “Position and Policies: China’s Arms Control in the New Era,” “Playing a Constructive Role in International Arms Control,” “Leading International Security Governance in Emerging Fields,” and “Strengthening International Cooperation on Nonproliferation and Peaceful Uses of Science and Technology.”
The white paper reiterated that China upholds a firm commitment to a policy of no-first-use of nuclear weapons and a nuclear strategy of self-defense. It said that China was compelled to make the strategic choice to develop nuclear weapons at a particular point in history to deal with nuclear threats and blackmail, break the existing nuclear monopoly, and prevent nuclear wars. China’s nuclear weapons are not intended to threaten other countries, but for defense and self-protection. China has never used nuclear weapons to threaten other countries nor deployed nuclear weapons outside its own territories, and has never provided a nuclear umbrella for other countries.
Whether confronted with nuclear threats or blackmail during the Cold War, or in a complex international security environment with growing strategic security threats at present, China has always committed to its policy of no-first-use of nuclear weapons, firmly upheld a nuclear strategy of self-defense, and promoted the modernization of its nuclear forces to safeguard China’s own strategic security and overall global strategic stability, according to the white paper………………………………………
…………….China previously issued white papers on arms control in 1995 and 2005. Pointing out new highlights in the new version, Guo told the Global Times that this white paper, for the first time, puts forward China’s vision for arms control – justice, cooperation, balance and effectiveness – emphasizing the balance of rights and obligations. It explicitly opposes abusing the concept of national security and export control measures, and exerting restrictions on developing countries’ rights to peaceful use of technology, Guo said.
Second, it is the first time to specifically address international security governance in emerging fields, detailing governance in the areas of outer space, cyberspace, and artificial intelligence, Guo said, noting that China advocates for strengthening the construction of a global governance system that takes into account the positions and interests of developing countries.
Third, the white paper summarizes China’s arms control policies and practices since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, highlighting many new practices and approaches. For example, in the field of nuclear arms control, in 2024, China submitted a working paper to the second session of the Preparatory Committee for the Eleventh Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), calling on the five nuclear-weapon states to conclude a treaty on mutual no-first-use of nuclear weapons, and also maintaining that nuclear-weapon states should undertake not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon states, Guo said. ………………..
…………………..The white paper said that China upholds a firm commitment to a policy of no-first-use of nuclear weapons and a nuclear strategy of self-defense, stressing that China’s greatest contribution to international nuclear arms control lies in the fact that it has the most stable, consistent and predictable nuclear policy among all nuclear-weapon states. “China’s nuclear weapons policy has remained remarkably consistent since 1964, consistently keeping its nuclear capabilities at the minimum level required for national security,” the expert noted………………………………………
…………………… n the chapter “Playing a Constructive Role in International Arms Control,” the white paper urged Japan to thoroughly destroy the chemical weapons it abandoned in China. During World War II, in flagrant violation of international law, invading Japanese troops used chemical weapons on a large scale in China. A total of 1,791 instances of chemical weapon use have been documented with confirmed dates, locations, and casualty records. The resulting casualties exceeded 200,000. After its defeat, Japan abandoned a large quantity of chemical weapons in China to cover up its crimes. Since the end of World War II, these abandoned chemical weapons have resulted in more than 2,000 poisoning casualties, gravely endangered the lives and property of the Chinese people as well as the environment.
“The Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) clearly stipulates that a state party which has abandoned chemical weapons on the territory of another state party shall provide all necessary financial, technical, expert, facility as well as other resources for the purpose of destroying these weapons. After the CWC entered into force, the governments of China and Japan signed two memorandums, in 1999 and 2012, on destroying the chemical weapons abandoned by Japan, to advance the destruction process. However, due to insufficient attention and input from the Japanese side, the destruction plan has missed four deadlines. To date, the Japanese side has not yet provided comprehensive, detailed and accurate information on the whereabouts of its abandoned chemical weapons.
…………………………..Introducing the white paper, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said at a regular press conference on Thursday that this year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People’s War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, as well as the 80th anniversary of the founding of the UN. ……………………………………………………………………… https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202511/1349241.shtml
Due to legal considerations UK government is now pausing its planned nuclear regulatory reforms.

Labour is reportedly pausing nuclear-sector reforms despite a sweeping
report urging planning and regulatory changes to cut costs and accelerate
new projects. Legal concerns raised by a government adviser have prompted Reeves to withhold the recommendations from the upcoming Budget, delaying growth-focused measures. ……………………
The Labour government is set to hold fire on pushing through sweeping reforms to nuclear energy due to a legal adviser’s concerns over the “UK’s
environmental, trade and human rights obligations”……….
ITV News has now reported that the Chancellor will
not include the growth-focused recommendations in her Budget speech on
Wednesday. The broadcaster reported that the Chancellor will make reforms “subject to further work and review” after a government adviser voiced concerns about the legal crossovers in the paper with UK obligations………
Oil Price 26th Nov 2025, https://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Nuclear-Power/Britains-Nuclear-Reform-Set-to-Stall-Over-Legal-Concerns.html
UK’s new nuclear body urges scrapping nature protections for new projects

24th November 2025, https://www.cpre.org.uk/news/nuclear-body-urges-scrapping-nature-protections-for-new-projects/
In the spring of 2025, the government set up a Nuclear Regulatory Taskforce to make it easier to build new nuclear projects. Their final report has just been published and its recommendations threaten some of the hard-won measures we have to protect our countryside and nature.
The taskforce was made up of figures working for the nuclear industry. They’re proposing two measures in particular that we’re worried about.
First, it proposes that new nuclear as a whole would get an opt-out of both the Habitats Directive and the mitigation hierarchy. This is a mechanism whereby developers first need to seek to avoid harm and then try to minimise the harm. Only when they cannot do this, they should compensate for the harm by improving the natural environment elsewhere.
The report calls for nuclear developments to pay into the new Nature Restoration Fund being set up by the Planning and Infrastructure Bill and ‘move directly to off-site nature conservation’ as the default. This sweeps away the first part of the hierarchy, which asks developers to avoid or minimise local harms on landscapes and nature in favour of offsetting the harm somewhere else. This is counter to CPRE’s view which is that protecting and regenerating landscapes at the source must come first.
Secondly, it calls for the scrapping of the duty on public bodies to further the statutory purposes of National Parks and National Landscapes, which came in in 2023. The report says the duty ‘has caused confusion, and will likely delay, and add cost, to nuclear development.’
Two CPRE groups – Kent and Friends of the Lake District – have already challenged decisions using the new protected landscapes duty, but in both cases planning permission was still granted.
Scrapping this duty would undermine the progress made in safeguarding our protected landscapes like the South Downs or the Shropshire Hills and return us to the weak duty that existed previously.
The Chancellor has said she welcomes the report and will set out the government’s response on Wednesday, and we’ll be strongly urging ministers not to dilute nature and landscape protections.
CT scans: benefits vs cancer risks

Program: CT scans: benefits vs cancer risks
CT scans can be vital in diagnosing disease, but they do come with small
increased risks because of the radiation exposure. A recent US study found
that if current practices persist, CT-associated cancer could account for
up to five per cent of all new diagnoses. So what can be done to drive down
the risk? One radiologist thinks mandating informed consent before a scan
is done would be a good start.
ABC 28th Nov 2025, https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/healthreport/ct-scans-cancer-radiation-risk/106076780
Ministry Of Defence looking at ‘various sites’ for sub dismantling project.

COMMENT. Put more simply. the UK government doesn’t really know what to do with the toxic wastes from nuclear submarines.
Governments are obsessed with “defence” against each other. Meanwhile the public thinks ‘jobs, jobs, jobs” even if those jobs are toxic, and part of a useless industry.
By George Allison, November 28, 2025, https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/mod-looking-at-various-sites-for-sub-dismantling-project/
A written answer in Parliament has confirmed that the Ministry of Defence is actively considering multiple locations for the UK’s permanent submarine dismantling and disposal capability.
Responding to Graeme Downie MP, defence minister Luke Pollard said the demonstrator vessel Swiftsure continues to be dismantled at Rosyth and remains on track to complete in 2026. He noted that “there are six further legacy submarines in Rosyth awaiting to enter the dismantling process.”
Those boats, alongside the 15 stored at Devonport, form the initial batch being processed under the Submarine Dismantling Project.
Pollard confirmed that the enduring solution will be delivered through a separate effort, the Submarine Disposal Capability Project, which is still in its concept phase. He stated that the department is “assessing options for the capability and its location with various sites under consideration within the UK,” adding that Parliament will be informed once a decision is ready.
This aligns with the practical pressures on the Defence Nuclear Enterprise. Rosyth can process only a small number of hulls at a time, while Devonport’s workload is dominated by defuelling, refit work and major safety driven upgrades. Both sites have finite regulatory and environmental headroom.
The broader SDP context helps explain the direction of travel as since 2013 the programme has been tasked with dealing with 27 retired submarines, removing radioactive and conventional waste safely and refining methods as it progresses. Swiftsure’s dismantling has already informed improved procedures, and the MoD reports that later boats will see faster and cheaper waste removal.
The Swiftsure project has proven the process, but the long term question remains open: where should the UK base a facility that will handle future decommissioned submarines on a rolling, multi decade basis. Pollard’s answer confirms that this decision is now in play.
From WMDs to “Narco-States”: How the US Sells Wars the Intelligence Doesn’t Support
Mintpress News, September 18th, 2025, Alan Macleod
The United States is building up its military assets, sparking fears of another regime change attempt against Venezuela—and this one could be far more deadly than the others. Citing an influx of Venezuelan drugs into the U.S., the Trump administration is rapidly building up its military forces, encircling the South American nation, one which has been in Washington’s crosshairs for over a quarter of a century.
Military Buildup
The Trump administration is once again setting its sights on Venezuela. In recent weeks, President Trump deployed additional naval and air assets to the Caribbean, including seven warships, a submarine, and an amphibious assault ship, designed for maritime invasions. A squadron of advanced F-35 fighter jets has also been relocated to Puerto Rico, bringing them within striking distance of Caracas. In total, around 4,500 personnel (including 2,500 combat-ready Marines) have been repositioned to the area.
In what could be the opening salvo of a major war, the military has already begun to flex its muscles. Earlier this month, it destroyed a small Venezuelan vessel, carrying out multiple attacks on the boat to ensure there were no survivors. Trump celebrated the action in a post on Truth Social, claiming that the boat was carrying illicit drugs to the United States, and that its crew were member of the Tren de Aragua cartel (TDA), a group, he said, is “operating under the control of [Venezuelan president] Nicolás Maduro” himself; one that is “responsible for mass murder, drug trafficking, sex trafficking, and acts of violence and terror across the United States.”…………………………………………………………………………………………………
Claims vs Evidence
The Trump administration’s extraordinary claims about Maduro and Venezuela have convinced few experts. Professor Julia Buxton of Liverpool John Moores University, a specialist in both global drug policy and Venezuelan politics, told MintPress:
“The claim that Venezuela is a major drugs producer has been an ongoing theme of the U.S. campaign against Venezuela dating back to the early 2000s. This kind of anti-drug messaging is really common in U.S. foreign policy and strategy for at least 100 years. What we have got here is essentially just recycled Ronald Reagan [talking points] … It is unsubstantiated and absurd, and it is really not backed by any official data.”
The data does indeed jar wildly with the administration’s accusations. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime’s World Drug Report 2025 explains that cocaine—the drug most associated with South America—is primarily produced in Colombia, Peru, or Bolivia, and transported via ports in Ecuador to the United States. Venezuela is not mentioned at all in the 98-page document, which catalogs producers, consumers, suppliers, and supply lines of drugs.
The vast majority of lethal drugs produced in South America travel via the Pacific coastline from Ecuador. In terms of supply routes, a small amount of Colombian cocaine is trafficked through the country’s long and porous rainforest border with Venezuela, and then transported via the Caribbean. But this is minuscule in comparison to that transported via Pacific ships, over the land route through Central America and Mexico, or simply flown directly to the U.S. from the cocaine producing states………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..https://www.mintpressnews.com/us-venezuela-drug-war-claims/290475/
DARPA Going Hard on Insect-Sized Spy Robots

It’s giving “bugged” a whole new meaning.
By Joe Wilkins, Sep 24, 2025, https://futurism.com/future-society/darpa-robot-insects
Forget robot wolves and missile-deflecting satellites — those things are already becoming old news. Instead, future wars just might revolve around insect-size spy robots.
A recent digest of present-day microbots by US national security magazine The National Interest breaks down the many machines currently in development by the US military and its associates. They include sea-based microdrones, cockroach-style surveillance bots, and even cyborg insects.
Arguably the most refined program to date is the RoboBee, currently being shopped by Harvard’s Wyss Institute. Originally funded by a $9.3 million grant from the National Science Foundation in 2009, the RoboBee is a bug-sized autonomous flying vehicle capable of transitioning from water to air, perching on surfaces, and autonomous collision avoidance in swarms.
The RoboBee features two “wafer-thin” wings that flap some 120 times a second to achieve vertical takeoff and mid-air hovering. The US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has reportedly taken a keen interest in RoboBee prototypes, sponsoring research into microfabrication technology, presumably for quick field deployments.
In the future, the little bots may very well carry payloads of monitoring equipment like microphones and cameras, though that’s easier said than done at such a minute scale.
Other developments, like the aforementioned cyborg insect, remain in early stages. Researchers have successfully demonstrated the capabilities of these remote-control systems using of a range of insect hosts, from the unicorn beetle to the humble cockroach.
Though DARPA has been funding insect-machine technology since 2006, their practical application is up in the air. Still, researchers are trying to keep up with the times, looking into ways to tune drone swarming algorithms to fit their cyborg creations.
Underwater microrobotics are another area of interest for DARPA. In this case, the application is said to be less mobile, instead focusing on clandestine monitoring of vulnerable underwater infrastructure.
The Interest also points to an alleged “robo-jelly” the agency has in the works, a soft-bodied autonomous drone which can silently glide through coastal waters. How practical this is remains to be seen — jellyfish are notorious drifters, following the ebbs and flows of coastal tides and deep ocean currents.
Last is the cockroach bot, the Dynamic Autonomous Sprawled Hexapod (DASH) in the works at DARPA’s notorious proving grounds at UC Berkeley. A white paper released by UC Berkeley back in 2009 defines DASH as a 16 gram, 10cm long autonomous robot which maneuvers via six legs powered by a single motor. It’s also capable of surmounting steps greater than its own height, and absorbing significant blows, including falls “from any height.”
According to the Interest, DASH is being developed with an eye toward crush resistance implying a quality-over-quantity approach compared to more agile systems like the RoboBee.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (29)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS




