nuclear-news

Geoffrey Hinton: They’re spending $420 billion on AI. It pays off only if they fire you.

So the business case for AI isn’t “AI will help workers be more productive.” It’s “AI will replace workers entirely, and we’ll pocket the salary savings.”

Tasmia Sharmin, Nov 2, 2025, Published in Predict.

Let me translate what Geoffrey Hinton just said, because it’s important and most people are going to miss it.

Geoffrey Hinton literally invented the neural networks that power modern AI. He won a Nobel Prize for it. And this week, he went on Bloomberg TV and said something that tech CEOs have been dancing around for months:

Tech companies cannot profit from their AI investments without replacing human workers.

Not “might replace.” Not “could eventually replace.” Cannot profit without replacing.

That’s not a prediction. That’s him explaining the business model.

What He’s Actually Saying

Here’s Hinton’s point in plain English:

Tech giants are spending $420 billion next year on AI infrastructure. Microsoft, Meta, Google, Amazon. They’re building data centers, buying AI chips, training massive models.

That money only makes sense if AI replaces workers.

Think about it. If you spend $100 billion building AI systems, how do you make that money back?

You can’t just sell slightly better products. You need massive cost savings. And the biggest cost in any company is labor.

So the business case for AI isn’t “AI will help workers be more productive.” It’s “AI will replace workers entirely, and we’ll pocket the salary savings.”

Hinton is saying what everyone in Silicon Valley knows but won’t say publicly: the whole AI investment thesis depends on job elimination.

Why This Matters

When Amazon CEO Andy Jassy says the 14,000 layoffs are about “culture, ” Hinton is calling bullshit.

When tech companies say AI will “augment” human workers, Hinton is calling bullshit.

When they claim AI will create as many jobs as it destroys, Hinton, who literally invented this technology, is saying: I don’t believe that.

He told Bloomberg: “I believe that to make money you’re going to have to replace human labor.”

Not augment. Replace.

This is the guy who understands AI better than almost anyone on the planet. And he’s warning us that the tech industry’s entire AI strategy is built on eliminating jobs.

The Numbers Back Him Up

Since ChatGPT launched in November 2022, job openings have dropped 30%.

During that same time, the stock market went up 70%. So companies are doing great. Investors are happy. But jobs are disappearing.

Stanford research found that young workers (22–25) in AI-exposed fields saw employment drop 13% to 16%. Meanwhile, older workers in the same fields actually saw job growth.

What does that tell you?

Companies are replacing entry-level workers with AI while keeping experienced people for now.

The pattern is clear: AI isn’t creating a bunch of new jobs. It’s eliminating the bottom rungs of the career ladder.

What Hinton Sees That Others Won’t Say

Previous technological revolutions created jobs while destroying others. Cars eliminated horse-related jobs but created automotive manufacturing, gas stations, road construction, and suburbs.

Hinton thinks AI is different. He’s skeptical that AI will follow that historical pattern.

Why?

Because AI doesn’t just replace one type of job. It can potentially replace cognitive work across entire industries. Writing, analysis, coding, design, customer service, data entry, research, translation.

When factories automated, displaced workers could move to other sectors. When AI automates cognitive work, where do knowledge workers go?

Hinton doesn’t have an answer. Nobody does. And that’s what scares him.

The $420 Billion Question

Tech companies are projected to spend $420 billion on AI next year. OpenAI alone announced $1 trillion in infrastructure deals.

That is an insane amount of money.

The only way to justify spending that much is if you’re confident the returns will be massive . And the only way to get massive returns is through massive labor cost reduction.

Hinton is basically saying: look at the math. These companies aren’t investing hundreds of billions to make workers 10% more productive. They’re investing to eliminate positions entirely.

When a Bloomberg interviewer asked if AI investments could generate returns without job cuts, Hinton said he believes they can’t.

Think about what that means. The person who pioneered AI technology is telling you the business model requires job elimination. And companies are investing as if he’s right.

Why Amazon’s “Culture” Excuse is Bullshit

This week, Amazon fired 14,000 people. CEO Andy Jassy said it’s about culture and organizational layers, not AI.

But back in June, Jassy wrote a memo saying Amazon would need “fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today” because of AI efficiency gains.

So which is it, Andy?

Hinton is cutting through the corporate speak.

He’s saying: of course it’s about AI. The entire industry is betting on AI replacing workers. Stop pretending otherwise.

Amazon is just the first major wave. More are coming.

The Healthcare and Education Exception

Hinton isn’t totally pessimistic. He admits AI will have benefits in healthcare and education.

AI can help doctors diagnose diseases, analyze medical images, personalize treatment. It can help students learn at their own pace, provide tutoring, make education more accessible.

But even there, it’s not all upside.

Better diagnostic AI means you need fewer radiologists. Better educational AI means you need fewer tutors and teaching assistants.

The benefits are real. But so is the job displacement.

The Real Problem Hinton Identifies

Here’s the most important thing Hinton said, and most people will miss it:

The problem isn’t AI itself. It’s how we organize society.

Right now, we live in a system where most people need jobs to survive. Income comes from employment. No job means no money, no healthcare, no security.

So when AI eliminates jobs, that’s catastrophic for individuals even if it’s profitable for companies.

Hinton is pointing out that our entire social structure assumes full employment. When that assumption breaks, the system breaks.

Unless we restructure how society works, how wealth is distributed, and how people access resources, AI-driven job displacement creates a crisis.

What Makes This Warning Different

Lots of people warn about AI and jobs. But most of them are outside the industry, or they’re critics, or they’re trying to sell you something.

Hinton is different. He’s not some Luddite afraid of technology. He invented this technology. He won a Nobel Prize for work that made modern AI possible.

And he quit Google specifically so he could speak freely about AI risks without it reflecting on his employer.

When the person who created the technology warns you about its consequences, you should probably listen.

The Uncomfortable Truth

Here’s what Hinton is really saying, stripped of all politeness:

Tech companies are spending hundreds of billions on AI. That investment only pays off if they fire massive numbers of workers and pocket the salary savings. They know this. Their business plans depend on it.

Everything else, all the talk about augmentation and productivity and creating new jobs, is PR.

The actual business model is: build AI, replace workers, increase profits.

And unless society fundamentally changes how it works, this is going to devastate a lot of people while making shareholders very rich.

My Take

I think Hinton is right, and it’s terrifying that he’s right.

The math is simple. Companies are investing too much money in AI for the returns to come from anything other than large-scale job replacement. The spending only makes sense if the plan is to eliminate positions.

And they’re not going to admit that’s the plan until it’s already happening.

We’ll keep hearing about culture changes and organizational efficiency and digital transformation. But the reality is what Hinton described: companies betting on AI to replace human labor because that’s where the money is.

The scary part isn’t that one guy thinks this. The scary part is that he invented the technology, understands it better than almost anyone, and he’s warning us that the people building AI are building it specifically to replace jobs.

We should probably pay attention!!!

Do you think Hinton is right? Can tech companies make back their AI investments without massive job cuts? Or is he just stating the obvious that everyone else is too polite to say?

Because if he’s right, and I think he is, we’re not preparing for what’s coming. We’re still pretending this is about productivity tools and augmentation while companies are quietly planning for something much more disruptive.

November 18, 2025 - Posted by Christina Macpherson | employment, technology