Moniz’s Proposal for a Regional Nuclear Consortium with Iran

11 October 2025

WANA (Oct 11) – As the reinstatement of international sanctions against Iran effectively signals the formal collapse of the JCPOA, Ernest Moniz, former U.S. Secretary of Energy and a key figure in the original nuclear deal, has reintroduced the debate on Iran’s nuclear program with a bold proposal. In an article published in Foreign Policy, Moniz calls for the creation of a regional nuclear consortium involving Iran and other Middle Eastern countries—an initiative he claims could curb nuclear tensions while promoting peaceful nuclear energy across the region.

The End of the JCPOA and a New Idea Emerges

Moniz argues that the return of international sanctions highlights the final breakdown of the JCPOA, which had successfully restrained Iran’s nuclear activities until the U.S. withdrawal in 2018. He claims that Iran’s accelerated uranium enrichment to 60 percent and reduced cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have made the deal irreparable.

Yet, Moniz emphasizes that military action or sanctions alone cannot resolve the issue. The only viable path, he argues, is a new framework based on regional cooperation: a “Middle Eastern Nuclear Consortium.”

Consortium: Cooperation or Control?

Under this plan, countries in the region—including Iran, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Jordan, and Egypt—would jointly participate in the production and peaceful use of nuclear energy. According to Moniz, the nuclear fuel cycle would be distributed among multiple countries, preventing any single state from independently developing nuclear weapons.

This division of responsibilities—from uranium extraction to fuel production—would accelerate peaceful nuclear technology while raising the cost and difficulty of nuclear weapons development. Countries found v

Iran’s Special Role: Limitation or Participation?

The most contentious aspect of Moniz’s plan concerns Iran. He argues that uranium enrichment should not take place on Iranian soil, but rather in a neutral location—potentially an island in the Persian Gulf or territory in Oman—under direct IAEA supervision.iolating the consortium’s rules could be removed, and their nuclear programs dismantled.

“Iran has enriched over 400 kilograms of uranium to 60 percent, which has no reasonable civilian purpose. To prevent recurrence, enrichment must occur in an international facility outside Tehran’s direct control,” Moniz writes.

He also proposes regional nuclear fuel banks to ensure all member states, including Iran, have secure access to nuclear fuel. Meanwhile, Iran could temporarily continue limited enrichment (up to 5 percent) until the regional fuel cycle is fully operational. In exchange for halting enrichment on its territory and accepting enhanced transparency, Western countries would facilitate investment in Iran’s civilian nuclear energy program.

Silence on Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal

A notable criticism of Moniz’s proposal is the absence of any reference to Israel’s nuclear weapons. Previous Iranian proposals, such as the “Minaret Plan” by former Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and ex-ambassador Mohsen Baharvand, emphasized a nuclear-weapon-free Middle East. Moniz’s plan, however, does not address Israel’s arsenal, which some analysts view as a one-sided U.S. approach……………………………………………………

Moniz stresses that implementing this plan requires tough decisions from all parties. From his perspective, Iran must dilute its 60-percent enriched uranium, return to JCPOA-level cooperation, and accept expanded inspections. In return, the U.S. and Europe would reopen pathways for investment in Iran, fostering the growth of civilian nuclear energy within the country.

However, Iranian officials have repeatedly affirmed that domestic enrichment is a red line and that Iran’s nuclear program remains entirely peaceful—a position echoed by IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi.

Moniz’s plan can be seen as an attempt to reimagine the JCPOA in a regional format: ostensibly promoting peaceful nuclear energy while structurally limiting Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Analysts note that if designed on the principles of mutual respect, non-discrimination, and equal participation, such multilateral cooperation could reduce tensions and enhance nuclear technology collaboration in the Middle East.

Yet, the fundamental question remains: Will Iran, having experienced what it considers Western breaches of trust in the JCPOA, agree to transfer parts of its most sensitive nuclear activities abroad? https://wanaen.com/monizs-proposal-for-a-regional-nuclear-consortium-with-iran/