A breakdown of Tony Blair’s bizarre proposal to run Gaza

His handling of the Iraq war as premier of the UK, as well as his dealings with a string of autocrats, has left him deeply unpopular across the globe.

Proposed transitional authority will have global billionaires and businesspeople at top and Palestinians at bottom, according to leaked draft

Middle East Eye, By Rayhan Uddin, 29 September 2025

An unlikely answer has been found for who should lead the process of running Gaza after Israel’s genocidal war: Tony Blair.

It was revealed last week that the former British prime minister – a controversial figure in the Middle East, to say the least – was being considered to lead a transitional authority in the enclave.

Haaretz has now published a leaked draft plan of what Gaza would look like under Blair’s initiative.

The plan reveals a hierarchy in which an international board of billionaires and businesspeople sit at the top, while highly vetted “neutral” Palestinian administrators are at the bottom.

It sets out a three-year plan, budgeted at $90m in the first year, $134m in the second and $164m in the third (these are solely management expenses, and don’t include reconstruction or aid).

The administration would work closely with Israel, Egypt and the US, and, according to Israeli sources cited by Haartez, has the backing of the White House.

Middle East Eye breaks down key highlights from the 21-page leaked document.

Board of billionaires

Gaza International Transitional Authority, or Gita, is the name given to the new institution which will administer the Palestinian enclave.

According to the draft, Gita will be run by an international board which has “supreme political and legal authority for Gaza during the transitional period”.

The board will be in charge of all appointments, and supervise every component of the authority.

It will be made up of between seven and 10 members, including a chair.

The board will include a senior UN official, with Sigrid Kaag, the UN’s special coordinator for the Middle East peace process, cited as an example.

It would also include “leading international figures with executive and financial expertise”.

Three names are cited as potential candidates: Marc Rowan, a billionaire who owns one of America’s largest private equity firms, Naguib Sawiris, an Egyptian billionaire in the telecommunications and technology sector, and Aryeh Lightstone, chief executive of the Abraham Accords Peace Institute.

Lightstone was a senior adviser to David Friedman, a staunch defender of Israel’s illegal settlement movement, when he was US ambassador to Israel between 2017 and 2021 under Donald Trump’s first administration.

According to Haaretz, he was also deeply involved in the creation of the highly controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.

Not every single board member will be a billionaire or have links to Israel or America.

There will be “at least one qualified Palestinian representative”, potentially coming from the “business or security sector”. It wasn’t made clear what “qualified” means.

And finally, the document said that the board would have “a strong representation of Muslim members to ensure regional legitimacy and cultural credibility”.

These Muslim figures would ideally have the political support of their countries, but also “long standing business credibility”.

Members of the board would be “nominated by contributing states and confirmed through a process coordinated by the UN”.

The board would report to the UN Security Council, which would ultimately grant it authority to carry out its functions.

The Security Council currently includes non-permanent members that have been highly critical of Israel’s genocide in Gaza, such as Algeria, Pakistan and Slovenia, in addition to permanent members Russia and China.

It would be interesting to see if these countries would approve a transitional government in Gaza run mostly by non-Palestinian billionaires and business figures.

The chairman (probably Blair)

Various media outlets have reported that Blair is being touted to be the chair of the transitional authority, though his name is not mentioned in the draft.

Public-private partnerships to run government projects, one of Blair’s hallmark policies as prime minister of the UK, is mentioned in the document.

According to the draft plan, the chairman will serve as the “senior political executive, principal spokesperson, and strategic coordinator for the entire transitional authority”.

They would be appointed through “international consensus” and endorsement by the UN Security Council. There is no mention of Palestinian consensus in choosing them.

If Blair is indeed the proposed chairman, he may have his work cut out gaining “international consensus” for his appointment.

His handling of the Iraq war as premier of the UK, as well as his dealings with a string of autocrats, has left him deeply unpopular across the globe.

The chair will represent Gita “in all diplomatic, donor and intergovernmental forums”. They will also lead “strategic security diplomacy” with other actors, “including Israel, Egypt and the United States”.

The document notes that initially, Gita’s senior officials won’t be in Gaza. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Palestinian Executive Authority, with little authority

Despite the name, the Palestinian Executive Authority, at the bottom of the hierarchy, has little to no independent authority.

It is separate from the PA, which administers parts of the occupied West Bank…………………………………………

It’s notable that the language used for all roles throughout the document, like board, chairman and CEO, reflects a business structure rather than a country or territory.

The Palestinian CEO will lead the process of identifying “directors” (not ministers) to head up the various departments like health, education, infrastructure and planning. …..

The international board of billionaires and businesspeople will have the final say on appointments “to safeguard institutional legitimacy and independence”.

“All department heads are subject to performance review and can be dismissed or replaced in accordance with transitional governance procedures,” the document notes.

An Israeli source told Haaretz that the Palestinian Executive Authority would be completely subordinate to the board and have no independent authority.

As such, it would be far weaker than the technocratic administration set out in a joint Arab plan led by Egypt earlier this year.

Below the Palestinian Executive Authority are a number of municipal roles related to the running of local public services and utilities. ………………………………………………………….. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/breakdown-tony-blairs-bizarre-proposal-run-gaza