nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

Who defeated the Nazis in World War 2 ? Thank God for Hollywood!

On the 8th May 1945, Germany surrendered unconditionally to the Allies. On the 9th May 2025, Russia is holding a grand commemoration – a “Victory Day” for the 80th anniversary of this event.

How dare they? I know, from my extensive cinema history, that the Americans won World War 2.

Many exciting and entertaining movies have been made, over the decades, glorifying the courage and success of the good soldiers on the good side – several allied nations, notably the British. But my favourites were always from Hollywood. There were so many, and of course, I haven’t seen them all.

From early on, there were movies like The Story of G.I. Joe, Dive Bomber, So Proudly We Hail! and Sahara . And During World War II, Disney made films for every branch of the United States Armed Forces and government.

Hollywood downplayed the efforts and contributions of the other Allies . But some films grudgingly acknowledged the United Kingdom, who kept the hopeless fight alive until the USA joined in and saved the day. Non-European Allies are mostly never even mentioned, especially China, with its pivotal role in the war against Japan. The Soviet-German war on the Eastern Front if mentioned at all, is sometimes portrayed as a sideshow .

Some movies based on real events, such as the film U571 are about real persons who were not American, depicted them as Americans. U571 (2000) is about American submariners. ‘Red Tails’ (2012)is a great exaggeration about American airmen. In some movies, we learn that WWII only began only on December 7, 1941, when the United States entered the war. Some movies are such fun, even if fictional, for example the Americans killing Hitler in Inglourious Basterds. 

Many movies are about the overall war effort , but focus on America’s involvement.  Some of these films include Saving Private Ryan (1998) Flags of Our Fathers (2006): Band of Brothers (2001). Films on the D Day landings give the impression that the American landing on Omaha Beach was the decisive turning point that led to Allied victory in Europe.

Now, I know that I’m pretty right, in claiming that the Americans won World war 2. In our democratic culture we accept the opinions of the many. The more common view is now that the Americans were the primary reason for the Nazi defeat, with 40-52% in America and Europe saying so. (But Britons think it was the UK).  

In 1945, 57% of French citizens believed Moscow “contributed most to the defeat of Germany in 1945” – just 20% named the US, and 12% Britain. By 2015, less than a quarter of respondents recognised the Soviet role, with 54% believing the US to be Nazism’s ultimate vanquisher.  Today only 17-28% of Europeans and Americans suggest that the USSR did the bulk of the work in bringing down Hitler.

If you go to Encyclopedia Britannica, or Wikipedia, or many history sites, you are told some extraordinary facts and figures about the role of the Soviet Union in World War 2, and they attribute the defeat of Nazi Germany as being mainly achieved by the Russians, with substantial input from Britain and the USA.

For example – “The Eastern Front was decisive in determining the outcome in the European theatre of operations in World War II, eventually serving as the main reason for the defeat of Nazi Germany The decisive battles were Stalingrad, Kursk, and the Battle of Berlin.”

You find this sort of information – ” The Soviet Union lost at least 26 million in World War II, Considerably more than any other country. Russian casualties were 60 times the number of American casualties…. ..  More Russian died at Stalingrad than Americans and Britons died in the whole war.”

D Day 6 June 1944, was a big day in bringing the war towards the end. Approximately 156,000 Allied troops landed in Normandy, France, of which nearly half were  from the USA.  Additionally, smaller contingents of troops from other allied countries were also involved.  So at least the various historical records agree that the USA was strongly involved in the eventual victory, even though they joined in the war effort only in December 1941.

But now, it’s time to correct the records on who defeated the Nazis. Britain and Europe are doing their best, holding VE Day celebrations, in which Russia is excluded. And now, Donald Trump has issued a proclamation designating Thursday as a day for the United States to celebrate its victory in World War II -” we did more than any other Country, by far, in producing a victorious result on World War II”

President Donald Trump is busily correcting historical records, taking over the National Archives, or as he puts it RESTORING TRUTH AND SANITY TO AMERICAN HISTORY

So, between the entertainment culture, the political views of the Western Powers, and finally, no less a history expert than Donald Trump himself, we can hope that all that nonsense about Russia winning WW2 can be put to bed.

May 8, 2025 Posted by | Christina's notes, media | Leave a comment

80 years on, US still embattled in senseless Cold War with Russia

Walt Zlotow, West Suburban Peace Coalition, Glen Ellyn IL , 7 May 25, https://theaimn.net/80-years-on-us-still-embattled-in-a-cold-war-with-russia/#google_vignette

May 8 marks 80 years since Victory in Europe Day. That victory kicked off the 46 year long Cold War against our great WWII ally Soviet Union (now Russia).

Sadly, the 1991 end of the Soviet Union simply transferred the Cold War into a cool war against Russia which has since gone cold again.

We’ve spent the last 34 years ever expanding the Cold War NATO alliance to Russia’s borders to keep them out of the European political economy and guarantee a yearly trillion dollar defense budget to prop up American capitalism. What good is the world’s largest military if you do not have a monstrous enemy to justify it?

That could have been avoided except for arguably the worst vice presidential pick in American history.

Every American today knows who Harry Truman was but few have a clue about his predecessor. Henry Wallace was a 20th century American visionary shoved out of the vice presidency in 1944, denying him the presidency upon the death of FDR, and changing America and the world for the worse.

Henry Wallace has been largely written out of the American Story told to succeeding generations of Americans by the protectors of the American Super Power Myth.

Born in 1888 to an affluent Iowa Republican farm family, Wallace increased family wealth with his Hi-Bred Corn Company. But the Depression turned Wallace into a zealous champion of the common man, landing him the Secretary of Agriculture post in FDR’s first term. Possibly the most effective New Dealer, Wallace championed the broken American farmer using curtailed production and price supports to ameliorate rampant rural poverty. His unbridled Bernie Sanders like democratic socialism of the 30’s garnered him FDR’s reverence and the 1940 third term vice presidency.

Wallace transformed the vice presidency for the good, long before Dick Cheney transformed it for evil. FDR made him what journalists tabbed the ‘Assistant President’ in his role mobilizing war production during WWII and championing FDR’s vision for a truly peaceful post WWII world working in partnership with critical war ally Russia for a peaceful Europe and ending European colonialism in Asia and Africa.

 In 1942 he gave his famous “Common Man” speech, declaring the 20th century must celebrate the common man, not just, as Time publisher Henry Luce postured, the American Century. In 1943, he joined with the black community following the Detroit race riot, arguing “We cannot crush Nazi brutality abroad and condone race riots at home.”

His near FDR like popularity made him a lock for VP again on the ’44 Democratic ticket. But with FDR fading mentally and physically, party leaders saw opportunity to dump him. His peace proclivities threatened their continuation of a war economy to combat their imaginary new Hitler in the form of Joseph Stalin.

They closed the late night convention session on the brink of re nominating Wallace for a second term. That garnered time to make deals with the other candidates to move the pliant Harry Truman from last to first in the final VP tally.

Three months into term four FDR died thrusting Truman into the White House. This set the stage for the Cold War due to Truman’s capitulation to the neo-conservatives of his day such as Jimmy Byrnes and Jimmy Forestall who demanded a fresh enemy to keep the emerging Military-Industrial Complex in business. A Wallace presidency would have sidelined these anti Russian hardliners. The chance for a truly peaceful post WWII world was irrevocably lost.

The post WWII neocons won out over Wallace, but undaunted he launched a 3rd party progressive campaign in 1948 to unseat Truman. McCarthyite red smears and personal attacks on his progressive philosophy doomed him to just 3% of the ’48 vote, ending his career. Also ended was any opportunity for America to retreat from senseless Cold War.

That leaves us to ponder if today’s new Cold War will rage on for another 80 years.

May 8, 2025 Posted by | history, USA | Leave a comment

Westinghouse drops out of UK SMR competition

 Nuclear Engineering International 30th April 2025, https://www.neimagazine.com/news/westinghouse-drops-out-of-uk-smr-competition/

S Westinghouse has pulled out of the UK’s small modular reactor (SMR) design competition, according to the UK The Telegraph.

Earlier in April, three of the four competition finalists in Great British Nuclear’s (GBN’s) small modular reactor (SMR) competition submitted their final tenders. The four finalists received an Invitation to Submit Final Tender (ISFT) in February – GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, Holtec Britain, Rolls-Royce SMR, and Westinghouse Electric Company.

GEH (part of GE Vernova) proposed its BWRX-300 boiling water reactor; Holtec proposed its SMR-300 – a 300 MWe pressurised water reactor (PWR); the Rolls-Royce SMR is a 470 MWe PWR; and the Westinghouse AP300 is a 300 MWe/900 MWt PWR. Westinghouse, however, failed to submit its final tender.

GBN was expected to announce two winners this summer with bidders told to prepare to build three to four mini reactors each. The winners will be awarded contracts to co-fund further design development as well as the necessary regulatory, environmental and site-approvals before a final investment decision is taken in 2029. The contracts are expected to total £20bn ($26.7bn) – £10bn each if two companies are selected.

However, The Telegraph reported in February that the Government was considering awarding only one contract as Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor “is struggling to balance the books as weak economic growth makes it harder to meet her self-imposed ‘fiscal rules’ for borrowing.

According to The Telegraph, Westinghouse did not deny it had withdrawn but declined to give its reasons. “One industry source suggested the company had baulked at the commercial offer made by the Government.”

A spokesman from the UK Energy Department said: “Great British Nuclear is driving forward its SMR competition for UK deployment. It has now received final tenders, which it will evaluate ahead of taking final decisions this spring.”

There is growing concern that the economics of SMRs could prove even hard to justify at the high costs for the initial four units. None of the bidders has built their designs which are still in development. All SMRs in the GBN competition will be first-of-a-kind units (FOAK), which will push up costs.

Commenting on the issue, Neutron Bytes noted: “Most estimates are that economies of scale based on factory production of SMRs, promised by all four vendors, only kick in when order books come in “fleet mode,” e.g. by the dozen or more. It follows that even £10bn could be insufficient to cover the costs of four units any of the three 300 MWe offerings based on their status as FOAK projects.”

It added: “Splitting the difference for the GBN competition, e.g. awarding one winner £10bn, keeps the SMR initiative alive, but does nothing to promote long-term “fleet mode” production of SMRs which the UK nuclear industry points out is the only way to achieve economies of scale with factory production of SMRs.”

May 8, 2025 Posted by | Small Modular Nuclear Reactors, UK | Leave a comment

Rooftop solar can be torn out of capital’s hands

Decentralised solar has the potential to support co-operative, municipal
and other forms of community ownership and control. Solar power is
expanding across the global south, growing faster in China, India and
Brazil than in older, richer solar developers like the US, Japan and
Germany.

Big, corporate-owned solar farms now account for most of the
world’s solar capacity, but decentralised rooftop solar comes a close
second. Rooftop panels are often owned by households, especially in rich
countries, but overall are more likely to be owned by businesses – energy
companies that lease the rooftops, or industrial firms that generate
electricity for their own use.

Nevertheless, I will argue here, because of
its scale and simplicity, decentralised solar has the potential to support
co-operative, municipal and other forms of community ownership and control.
It can play a role in struggles to supercede the domination of capital with
a socially just society, and to forestall disastrous climate change.

 Ecologist 7th May 2025, https://theecologist.org/2025/may/07/rooftop-solar-can-be-torn-out-capitals-hands

May 8, 2025 Posted by | renewable | Leave a comment

Ohio EPA launches limited Luckey water testing after independent report shows high radiation in wells.

6 May 25 https://appareport.com/2025/05/06/ohio-epa-launches-limited-luckey-water-testing-after-independent-report-shows-high-radiation-in-wells/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=jetpack_social&fbclid=IwY2xjawKH1O9leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFqODFPMTBmQTF5TEZicE1sAR7DD3WHCKFbMcsxONI6PwwU3BG179LZeDq1kHE5syHZgCdNvasXdjpfr-DjYw_aem_DfMkHt4eTpIDIAfrZFlmGQ

The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, now under sharp scrutiny, will begin targeted water sampling in the village of Luckey on Wednesday, May 7. The move comes in response to independent testing conducted by The Toledo Blade, which uncovered elevated levels of radioactive contaminants in residential wells surrounding a former Cold War-era nuclear materials site.

The Ohio EPA said it will collect samples from Eastwood Local School buildings, Pemberville Public Library branches, and the Pemberville water treatment plants. The agency stated that certified laboratories will perform radiological analyses using “standard protocols,” though it has not clarified whether that includes specific isotope detection or testing for beta-emitting radionuclides.

Of the 38 samples tested for gamma radiation, 19 revealed bismuth-214 levels at least 10 times higher than the background thresholds established by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The presence of bismuth-214 strongly indicates the presence of radon-222, a radioactive gas known to increase cancer risk. Some wells also tested positive for radium-226, radon-222, alpha and beta radiation, beryllium, and mercury.

https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?gdpr=0&gdpr_consent=tcunavailable&tcfe=3&client=ca-pub-2554767935405984&output=html&h=280&adk=3957413466&adf=830603344&pi=t.aa~a.3453247533~i.6~rp.4&w=634&abgtt=6&fwrn=4&fwrnh=100&lmt=1746683330&num_ads=1&rafmt=1&armr=3&sem=mc&pwprc=3568220565&ad_type=text_image&format=634×280&url=https%3A%2F%2Fappareport.com%2F2025%2F05%2F06%2Fohio-epa-launches-limited-luckey-water-testing-after-independent-report-shows-high-radiation-in-wells%2F%3Futm_source%3Dfacebook%26utm_medium%3Djetpack_social%26fbclid%3DIwY2xjawKH1O9leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFqODFPMTBmQTF5TEZicE1sAR7DD3WHCKFbMcsxONI6PwwU3BG179LZeDq1kHE5syHZgCdNvasXdjpfr-DjYw_aem_DfMkHt4eTpIDIAfrZFlmGQ&host=ca-host-pub-2644536267352236&fwr=0&pra=3&rh=159&rw=633&rpe=1&resp_fmts=3&wgl=1&fa=27&uach=WyJXaW5kb3dzIiwiMTUuMC4wIiwieDg2IiwiIiwiMTM1LjAuNzA0OS4xMTUiLG51bGwsMCxudWxsLCI2NCIsW1siR29vZ2xlIENocm9tZSIsIjEzNS4wLjcwNDkuMTE1Il0sWyJOb3QtQS5CcmFuZCIsIjguMC4wLjAiXSxbIkNocm9taXVtIiwiMTM1LjAuNzA0OS4xMTUiXV0sMF0.&dt=1746683047064&bpp=1&bdt=4365&idt=1&shv=r20250506&mjsv=m202505050101&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3D64420eca75c0ed2b%3AT%3D1746229513%3ART%3D1746683048%3AS%3DALNI_MadpzcDidvM12j1XEfmCG_w3cmjYA&gpic=UID%3D000010171172a210%3AT%3D1746229513%3ART%3D1746683048%3AS%3DALNI_Ma3MjH8_Lx9G9s2ELouutptKcrFZQ&eo_id_str=ID%3Df70225faa56d1ddf%3AT%3D1746229513%3ART%3D1746683048%3AS%3DAA-AfjY3YWrttstp60Hpetggs1xY&prev_fmts=0x0%2C1265x585&nras=3&correlator=6082623994933&frm=20&pv=1&u_tz=600&u_his=2&u_h=720&u_w=1280&u_ah=672&u_aw=1280&u_cd=24&u_sd=1.5&dmc=8&adx=127&ady=3031&biw=1265&bih=585&scr_x=0&scr_y=699&eid=95358862%2C95358864%2C95354563%2C95359240%2C95359120%2C95359476&oid=2&pvsid=8479030565798310&tmod=1640054256&uas=3&nvt=1&fc=1408&brdim=0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1280%2C0%2C1280%2C672%2C1280%2C585&vis=1&rsz=%7C%7Cs%7C&abl=NS&fu=128&bc=31&bz=1&td=1&tdf=2&psd=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLDNd&nt=1&pgls=CAEQBBoHMS4xNTIuMQ..~CAEQBRoGMy4yOC40&ifi=3&uci=a!3&btvi=1&fsb=1&dtd=M

Beryllium, used at the Luckey site in the 1950s, was a focal point. Of 14 wells tested for it and other metals, multiple locations showed concerning levels. Several samples were also retested to look for specific contamination types.

Katie Boyer, spokesperson for the Ohio EPA, told investigative journalist Jason Salley during an earlier investigation into drinking water concerns in Pike County, that “Ohio public water systems are not required to monitor for gross beta radiation unless they are located near a known contamination source or are at risk of contamination. If initial tests show low or no beta radiation, no further testing is necessary. Gross beta monitoring is very rare in public water systems.”

https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?gdpr=0&gdpr_consent=tcunavailable&tcfe=3&client=ca-pub-2554767935405984&output=html&h=280&adk=3957413466&adf=1277231945&pi=t.aa~a.3453247533~i.8~rp.4&w=634&abgtt=6&fwrn=4&fwrnh=100&lmt=1746683332&num_ads=1&rafmt=1&armr=3&sem=mc&pwprc=3568220565&ad_type=text_image&format=634×280&url=https%3A%2F%2Fappareport.com%2F2025%2F05%2F06%2Fohio-epa-launches-limited-luckey-water-testing-after-independent-report-shows-high-radiation-in-wells%2F%3Futm_source%3Dfacebook%26utm_medium%3Djetpack_social%26fbclid%3DIwY2xjawKH1O9leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFqODFPMTBmQTF5TEZicE1sAR7DD3WHCKFbMcsxONI6PwwU3BG179LZeDq1kHE5syHZgCdNvasXdjpfr-DjYw_aem_DfMkHt4eTpIDIAfrZFlmGQ&host=ca-host-pub-2644536267352236&fwr=0&pra=3&rh=159&rw=633&rpe=1&resp_fmts=3&wgl=1&fa=27&uach=WyJXaW5kb3dzIiwiMTUuMC4wIiwieDg2IiwiIiwiMTM1LjAuNzA0OS4xMTUiLG51bGwsMCxudWxsLCI2NCIsW1siR29vZ2xlIENocm9tZSIsIjEzNS4wLjcwNDkuMTE1Il0sWyJOb3QtQS5CcmFuZCIsIjguMC4wLjAiXSxbIkNocm9taXVtIiwiMTM1LjAuNzA0OS4xMTUiXV0sMF0.&dt=1746683047068&bpp=3&bdt=4369&idt=3&shv=r20250506&mjsv=m202505050101&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3D64420eca75c0ed2b%3AT%3D1746229513%3ART%3D1746683048%3AS%3DALNI_MadpzcDidvM12j1XEfmCG_w3cmjYA&gpic=UID%3D000010171172a210%3AT%3D1746229513%3ART%3D1746683048%3AS%3DALNI_Ma3MjH8_Lx9G9s2ELouutptKcrFZQ&eo_id_str=ID%3Df70225faa56d1ddf%3AT%3D1746229513%3ART%3D1746683048%3AS%3DAA-AfjY3YWrttstp60Hpetggs1xY&prev_fmts=0x0%2C1265x585%2C634x280&nras=4&correlator=6082623994933&frm=20&pv=1&u_tz=600&u_his=2&u_h=720&u_w=1280&u_ah=672&u_aw=1280&u_cd=24&u_sd=1.5&dmc=8&adx=127&ady=3428&biw=1265&bih=585&scr_x=0&scr_y=1123&eid=95358862%2C95358864%2C95354563%2C95359240%2C95359120%2C95359476&oid=2&pvsid=8479030565798310&tmod=1640054256&uas=3&nvt=1&fc=1408&brdim=0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1280%2C0%2C1280%2C672%2C1280%2C585&vis=1&rsz=%7C%7Cs%7C&abl=NS&cms=2&fu=128&bc=31&bz=1&td=1&tdf=2&psd=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLDNd&nt=1&pgls=CAEQBBoHMS4xNTIuMQ..~CAEQBRoGMy4yOC40&ifi=4&uci=a!4&btvi=2&fsb=1&dtd=M

This admission has further fueled public concern, given that Luckey sits adjacent to a federally managed cleanup site under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). Critics argue that limited testing of public buildings, rather than the private wells identified in The Blade’s report, leaves gaps in understanding potential exposure risks.

In response to the Ohio EPA’s vague testing plan, the Appalachian Press and Public Affairs Report (APPA Report) submitted a formal request to the agency, pressing for clarity on whether the upcoming analyses will include beta emitters or man-made radionuclides. As of publication, the agency has not responded.

https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?gdpr=0&gdpr_consent=tcunavailable&tcfe=3&client=ca-pub-2554767935405984&output=html&h=280&adk=3957413466&adf=3563305841&pi=t.aa~a.3453247533~i.10~rp.4&w=634&abgtt=6&fwrn=4&fwrnh=100&lmt=1746683332&num_ads=1&rafmt=1&armr=3&sem=mc&pwprc=3568220565&ad_type=text_image&format=634×280&url=https%3A%2F%2Fappareport.com%2F2025%2F05%2F06%2Fohio-epa-launches-limited-luckey-water-testing-after-independent-report-shows-high-radiation-in-wells%2F%3Futm_source%3Dfacebook%26utm_medium%3Djetpack_social%26fbclid%3DIwY2xjawKH1O9leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFqODFPMTBmQTF5TEZicE1sAR7DD3WHCKFbMcsxONI6PwwU3BG179LZeDq1kHE5syHZgCdNvasXdjpfr-DjYw_aem_DfMkHt4eTpIDIAfrZFlmGQ&host=ca-host-pub-2644536267352236&fwr=0&pra=3&rh=159&rw=633&rpe=1&resp_fmts=3&wgl=1&fa=27&uach=WyJXaW5kb3dzIiwiMTUuMC4wIiwieDg2IiwiIiwiMTM1LjAuNzA0OS4xMTUiLG51bGwsMCxudWxsLCI2NCIsW1siR29vZ2xlIENocm9tZSIsIjEzNS4wLjcwNDkuMTE1Il0sWyJOb3QtQS5CcmFuZCIsIjguMC4wLjAiXSxbIkNocm9taXVtIiwiMTM1LjAuNzA0OS4xMTUiXV0sMF0.&dt=1746683047074&bpp=1&bdt=4375&idt=1&shv=r20250506&mjsv=m202505050101&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3D64420eca75c0ed2b%3AT%3D1746229513%3ART%3D1746683048%3AS%3DALNI_MadpzcDidvM12j1XEfmCG_w3cmjYA&gpic=UID%3D000010171172a210%3AT%3D1746229513%3ART%3D1746683048%3AS%3DALNI_Ma3MjH8_Lx9G9s2ELouutptKcrFZQ&eo_id_str=ID%3Df70225faa56d1ddf%3AT%3D1746229513%3ART%3D1746683048%3AS%3DAA-AfjY3YWrttstp60Hpetggs1xY&prev_fmts=0x0%2C1265x585%2C634x280%2C634x280&nras=5&correlator=6082623994933&frm=20&pv=1&u_tz=600&u_his=2&u_h=720&u_w=1280&u_ah=672&u_aw=1280&u_cd=24&u_sd=1.5&dmc=8&adx=127&ady=3794&biw=1265&bih=585&scr_x=0&scr_y=1493&eid=95358862%2C95358864%2C95354563%2C95359240%2C95359120%2C95359476&oid=2&pvsid=8479030565798310&tmod=1640054256&uas=3&nvt=1&fc=1408&brdim=0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1280%2C0%2C1280%2C672%2C1280%2C585&vis=1&rsz=%7C%7Cs%7C&abl=NS&fu=128&bc=31&bz=1&td=1&tdf=2&psd=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLDNd&nt=1&pgls=CAEQBBoHMS4xNTIuMQ..~CAEQBRoGMy4yOC40&ifi=5&uci=a!5&btvi=3&fsb=1&dtd=M

Sampling will begin at 1 p.m. on Wednesday at Basic Park in Luckey. Amy Klei, chief of Ohio EPA’s Division of Drinking and Ground Waters, will be available to address media questions about the scope and intent of the testing.

While state officials move forward with limited action, residents and environmental watchdogs continue to demand transparency and accountability, warning that failure to address the full scope of potential contamination could have long-term public health consequences.

May 8, 2025 Posted by | USA, water | Leave a comment

Starmer ignored nuclear watchdog when he blamed regulations for delays.

Guardian, Rob Edwards, 6 May 25

Office for Nuclear Regulation told government that claims about reactor delays in press release were ‘not true’.

Keir Starmer ignored warnings from his nuclear safety watchdog that it was wrong to blame regulations for delays building new reactors when he launched a plan to revive the nuclear power industry.

The prime minister unveiled the nuclear renaissance strategy in February and said investment had slumped because the industry was “suffocated by regulations”.

However, a document released under freedom of information law reveals that the UK’s Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) told the government in the run-up to the launch that claims about delays to nuclear power in a draft press release were “not true”. Despite this, the claims were repeated in the final release.

ONR was asked to comment on a draft government announcement of a taskforce to speed up the regulation of nuclear power. It made four corrections to the draft, which was passed to the investigative journalism cooperative The Ferret, and shared with the Guardian.

But none of ONR’s corrections were implemented when Starmer made the announcement on 6 February, under the headline “Government rips up rules to fire up nuclear power”.

The attack on nuclear regulations was part of Labour’s attempt to prove its growth credentials and coincided with it clipping the wings of the competition watchdog and hauling in regulators to demand they do more to boost the economy.

The draft release stated that three European regulatory regimes had reached different assessments of the design of the reactors being built at Hinkley Point C in Somerset, “leading to delays and increased costs”.

ONR said this was “not accurate” and that it had refuted such claims before. “Our feeling is that linking regulatory factors into the increasing Hinkley Point C costs and timeframes isn’t true and the sentence doesn’t stand up,” it said.

ONR also suggested that the new taskforce should look at not the “approval” but the “deployment” of new reactor designs. “The reactor approval process has no bearing on the overall speed of delivery, but rather construction,” it said.

Neither amendment was made in Starmer’s announcement, which reiterated the disputed wording in the draft. Two other changes suggested by ONR were also rejected.


The energy company EDF predicted in 2007 that electricity from Hinkley Point C would be cooking Christmas turkeys in 2017. EDF said in January 2024 that the station might not be finished until 2031.

The estimated total cost of building the plant has risen from £18bn in 2016 to £35bn in 2024. This could increase to £46bn when inflation is taken into account.

According to ONR, its assessment of the reactor design was completed in 2012 but construction did not start until 2017. Its regulation had not delayed building since then, it said.

Dave Cullen, who co-chairs a forum for ONR and campaign groups, described Starmer’s announcement as misleading.

“I’m shocked by the cynical and unprofessional approach of the government to this announcement,” said Cullen, who is independent of ONR. “It seems as though it would rather attack an imaginary problem than seriously consider how to approach energy security.”……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/may/06/starmer-nuclear-watchdog-regulations-delays-reactors

May 8, 2025 Posted by | safety | Leave a comment

Sellafield’s massive water abstraction plan for its new construction work has no environmental impact assessment and inadequate monitoring

Sellafield blithely apply to the Environment Agency for new water abstraction and in the same application admit that they have already contaminated the freshwater aquifer beneath them

Lakes against Nuclear Dump and NFLA , Marianne Birkby, May 07, 2025

Campaigners concerned that Sellafield’s water abstraction plan has no environmental impact assessment and inadequate monitoring

In a recent response to an Environment Agency consultation on a application by Sellafield Limited to extract water to support construction work at the site, campaigners at Lakes against the Nuclear Dump [LAND], a campaign of Radiation Free Lakeland, and the UK/Ireland Nuclear Free Local Authorities have expressed concerns that no environmental impact assessment has been carried out and that plans to monitor contamination in discharges are inadequate.

Sellafield plans to extract an additional 350,000 cubic metres of water a year from the Lake District to support the construction of new facility to repackage radioactive waste, whilst proposing to discharge almost a million litres of contaminated water every day into the River Calder and out into the sea. This for an indefinite and uncertain period.

LAND and the NFLAs are concerned that this will be done without an Environmental Impact Assessment being carried out and with no proper plans in place to monitor the discharged water, adding to fears that the work will lead to yet more radioactive contamination in the already fragile local environment.

Sellafield may believe that the discharges are safe and within legal limits, but the two campaign groups do not subscribe to the view that there is a safe limit when it comes to radiation and in recent years there have been large research studies demonstrating the cumulative effects of low-level, but legal, radiation on human health.

May 8, 2025 Posted by | environment, UK | Leave a comment

Starmer prepares for attack by Russia

Officials asked to update 20-year-old contingency plans that would put UK on war footing after Kremlin threats

Tony Diver,Associate Political Editor, 05 May 2025

Britain is secretly preparing for a direct military attack by Russia amid fears that it is not ready for war…

Officials have been asked to update
20-year-old contingency plans that would put the country on a war footing
after threats of attack by the Kremlin. A classified dossier will set out
how the Government would respond to a declaration of war, including bunkers
to protect the Cabinet and the Royal family, public service broadcasts and
the stockpiling of resources. Experts have warned that the country is
vulnerable to an assault on its critical national infrastructure, including
gas terminals, undersea cables, nuclear power plants and transport hubs.

 Telegraph 5th May 2025,
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/05/05/starmer-prepares-for-attack-by-russia/

May 8, 2025 Posted by | weapons and war | Leave a comment