Nuclear lobby gets EU approval as ‘strategic net-zero’ technology: its next battle is to get EU funding
EU countries reinstate nuclear among ‘strategic’ net-zero technologies
By Paul Messad | EURACTIV.fr | translated by Daniel Eck 8 Dec 23
Following in the footsteps of the European Parliament last month, EU member states in the Council have also included nuclear energy alongside renewables among the technologies promoted by the EU’s Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA).
…………………….As a result, nuclear power will benefit from streamlined licensing procedures: a one-stop-shop in each EU country and full digitisation of procedures to ensure that authorisations can be obtained within nine to 12 months………………..
France and eight other EU countries – Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia – submitted a joint declaration before the meeting reiterating the importance of supporting nuclear power and its financing at the EU level.
On the German side, the pill is harder to swallow…………………
As for other nuclear technologies that are not on the list of “strategic” technologies, these have been retained as “net zero” technologies and, as such, enjoy certain advantages.
Next battle: Financing
The key remaining battle now for pro-nuclear countries is to secure financing at EU level.
“Technological neutrality must also apply to financing,” French Industry Minister Roland Lescure told the Council, even though the NZIA “is not a financing text but a regulatory text,” as his office pointed out.
Indeed, “there are no financial provisions in the text, except that it does not contain any financial provisions, which Germany was keen to point out,” Lescure’s office added.
Germany, meanwhile, is leading the opposition.
“EU funds cannot be used for technologies that are not supported by all member states,” Giegold said. “It was, therefore, crucial for us to exclude funding issues from the NZIA and to leave existing European rules untouched,” he added.
The NZIA will, therefore, have no impact on whether or not EU funds can finance nuclear power or not.
But according to Lescure’s office, the status quo on this point is not a problem for now. Indeed, the door is still open for nuclear technologies to be financed by the European Investment Bank (EIB) and other upcoming EU funds, possibly the Strategic Technologies for Europe (STEP) platform for example, which is currently under discusssion.
“EU funds that do not finance nuclear power should do so in the future,” said a declaration adopted in July by the French-led Nuclear Alliance of 14 EU countries, which called for “impartiality” between nuclear power and renewables when it comes to EU funding.
In addition, the European Parliament’s position proposes that 25% of the revenues from the EU carbon market should be earmarked for financing the technologies listed in the NZIA.
The Council did not take up this possibility, which will be discussed at the forthcoming trilogue talks scheduled on 13 December.
“We can now begin negotiations and complete them before the European elections,” said Christian Ehler, Parliament’s rapporteur on the NZIA, on X.
[Edited by Frédéric Simon/Alice Taylor]
1 Comment »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- June 2024 (266)
- May 2024 (373)
- April 2024 (366)
- March 2024 (335)
- February 2024 (345)
- January 2024 (374)
- December 2023 (333)
- November 2023 (342)
- October 2023 (366)
- September 2023 (353)
- August 2023 (356)
- July 2023 (362)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
It is time to put the final nail in the coffin of nuclear power. Nuclear power is too expensive, too dangerous to be used safely, and totally unnecessary for our energy needs. Whether it is the European Union or the European Parliment, the dying, profit addicted nuclear industry is buying the votes of the elected leaders of Europe, just like they have done in the United States Congress and many State legislatures. The “Green Washing ” of nuclear power is simply not acceptable. It is not the panacea to stop global warming. We need a global “Apollo Lunar Landing” type project to transition to a renewable energy economy with just solar, wind, hydroelectric and geothermal energy. We have less than 10 years now to reverse the upward trend in global temperature. We also need to concurrently help mitigate the rising sea levels, increased, severe storms, hail, sleet, tornados, droughts storm surges and flooding on a global basis, especially for low lying ocean nations and nations on the ocean coasts.
Comment by paulrodenlearning | December 9, 2023 |