Oppenheimer, Japan bombings put nuclear energy in a harsh light
Utah Public Radio | By Eric Tegethoff, August 11, 2023 , https://www.upr.org/utah-news/2023-08-11/oppenheimer-japan-bombings-put-nuclear-energy-in-a-harsh-light
The power and destructiveness of nuclear energy has been in the spotlight since the film “Oppenheimer” was released in July. It is in focus again this week with the anniversaries of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan during World War II.
Mary Miller, a member of Idaho nuclear energy watchdog Snake River Alliance, explained the movie about J. Robert Oppenheimer and the first experiment with the atomic bomb stops short of the bombs dropped on Japan. But Miller noted Oppenheimer’s ideas changed after that.
“His message was that humanity must learn humility in the face of nature and use its experience with atomic energy to prosper international peace,” she said. “The nuclear power that was unleashed on Japan was just unimaginably too big and too lethal for humankind.”
The 78th anniversary of the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was Sunday, and the anniversary of the Nagasaki bombing is on Wednesday. It is estimated the two bombs may have killed as many as 226,000 people, most of whom were civilians.
Advocates for nuclear energy are increasingly promoting its ability to help move the country from dirty sources of fuel in the fight against climate change, but Miller said it should not be considered a clean source of energy because its negatives outweigh the good it might be able to achieve.
“Just like that power that was unleashed in the bomb, the use of nuclear energy for electricity, which is called nuclear power, cannot be safely anticipated, predicted or controlled,” she explained.
Miller pointed to a number of issues with nuclear energy, such as safe transportation and storage of its waste, which sometimes has a radioactive half life that extends thousands of years. Experiments on new types of nuclear reactors are eing conducted at the Idaho National Laboratory.
1 Comment »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- June 2024 (290)
- May 2024 (373)
- April 2024 (366)
- March 2024 (335)
- February 2024 (345)
- January 2024 (374)
- December 2023 (333)
- November 2023 (342)
- October 2023 (366)
- September 2023 (353)
- August 2023 (355)
- July 2023 (362)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
Whether it is the old boiling water, pressurized water or the “new” SMR or “Small Modular Reactors,” cooled by liquid sodium, liquid salt, helium or some other method, fueled with Thorium or some othe other radioactive elements. they are all too dangerous, too expensive and totally unnecessary for our energy needs. Wind and solar energy are cheaper, growing faster and don’t take as long as any size nuclear reactor to build. They are not the savior for climate change. The are just another diaster like Fukishima, Cherynoble or Three Mile Island. There is no solution for storing the waste. Any accident could contaminate an area the size of Pennsylvania or larger for hundreds of thousands of years. I never heard of a renewable energy facilitiy or manufacturing plant with that size of a threat of harm or length of deadly contimination. Go to the websit of the Solutions Project and the Rocky Mountain Institute if you still think we need nuclear energy for our energy needs. We will not “starve and freeze in the dark, nor “wreck our economy” in the process of transitioning to a renewable energy economy, contrary to the lies & propaganda of the nuclear and fossil fuel industry.
Comment by paulrodenlearning | August 13, 2023 |