Biased pro nuclear report on UK’s Sizewell project ignores the negative economic impacts
East Anglian Daily Times 25th March 2021, Opponents of Sizewell C have criticised a report claiming the power project will bring a £2billion boost to Suffolk as “smoke and mirrors” – but council chiefs have welcomed the findings. Commissioned by the Sizewell C Consortium, a group of 200-plus businesses and organisations supporting the proposed nuclear power station, the report was written by Ernst and Young after speaking to supply chain and key businesses in the region. The report said the decade-long construction period would bring an investment of £4.4bn in the East of England, of which around £2bn would be in Suffolk, along with tens of thousands of new jobs.
Campaign group Stop Sizewell C said: “This report uses smoke and mirrors. It massively overstates construction period jobs by counting them by the year so, over a 10-year build, the number is only 10% of those claimed. “Over three quarters of EDF’s construction workforce – around 6,000 – would be imported from outside East Anglia. EDF’s management has made no secret of its ‘ambition’to bring skilled workers from its Hinkley site to Suffolk. “The report uses gross spend rather than any net ‘benefit’ to Suffolk. “If a £20billion project is going to dominate the area for a decade you would expect a proportion to be spent locally, but 10% seems very bad value for money.
“The report also ignores the many negative economic impacts on East Suffolk’s thriving SME-based local business community, such as traffic congestion, displacement of workers, and loss of customers – not least in tourism.”
https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/sizewell-economic-boost-reaction-7849530
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- January 2026 (259)
- December 2025 (358)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (376)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS





Leave a comment