nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

High time the media stopped the lie about nuclear energy being “clean”

 

a-cat-CANIt’s high time that the media came clean about nuclear energy being supposedly “clean”.  Nuclear proponents were hand in glove with the coal and oil interests for decades – denying global warming.  They’re still hand in glove, helping those dirty industries keep going until aven dirtier nuclear takes over.
 
The climate argument is a hoax. So they nuclear reactor itself produces few (not zero) carbon emissions. So we are supposed to ignore all the carbon emissions from uranium mining and milling, fuel conversion, fuel fabrication, reactor construction, and all the transport involved in this chain. Then there’ s the chain at the end  – the building of spent fuel pools, waste containers, then eventual tomb for the wastes, and the dismantling, transport and burial of the dead reactor. The whole chain is not only carbon intensive, it’s also dangerous, and a chain of targets for terrorism.  Time to stop the lies about nuclear solving climate change!
global warming A

Decline of US nuclear industry is accelerating “…..Over the past few years, US companies have closed or announced plans to close eight reactors with a combined capacity of 6300 MW. Fertel claimed that another 15 to 20 plants are at risk of closure over the next 5 to 10 years. ……

Over the past seven years, Exelon has lost $800 million operating its Quad Cities and Clinton nuclear plants in Illinois, and the energy company has said it can’t continue to sustain those losses. http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/news/10.1063/PT.5.1075

June 3, 2016 Posted by | Christina's notes | Leave a comment

Russia moving in on America as a market for its nuclear fuel

Russian-BearFlag-USARussian Nuclear Fuel Giant Making A Move In U.S. Markets, Oil Price, 2 June 16,  http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Russian-Nuclear-Fuel-Giant-Making-A-Move-In-US-Markets.html  CHARLES KENNEDY Far from the specific paranoia of the Cold War era, talk now is that Russia’s Rosatom nuclear fuel giant may soon end up supplying 10 percent of U.S. nuclear fuel needs.

In partnership with General Electric Co. (GE), Russian state-owned Rosatom is expanding its nuclear fuel supply to the US, hoping to gain a 10-percent market share—adding to the 20 percent of the US enriched uranium market it already controls.

Last week, Rosatom’s TVEL signed an agreement with U.S. Global Nuclear Fuel-Americas, a subsidiary of GE-Hitachi, on cooperation in licensing, marketing and fabrication of fuel for U.S. Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs).

According to Russian news agencies, Russia currently holds 17 percent of the global nuclear power plant fuel market. That means it has covered all of its own supply for 76 reactors, along with the reactors in 14 more countries. By 2019-2020, Rosatom hopes to be supply nuclear fuel to the U.S..

Speaking at the Atomexpo-2016 on Monday, where it signed US$10 billion in deals, Rosatom TVEL Fuel Company vice-president Oleg Grigoryev said: “We expect the share of our deliveries to be more than 10% of the US market for this kind of fuel.”

TVEL’s exports already exceed US$1 billion annually, according to Russia’s Tass news agency. The move to gain this extra nuclear fuel market share still requires approval from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

According to Bloomberg, Rosatom has been supplying low-enriched uranium to the U.S .since 1987.

Rosatom is apparently not targeted by U.S. sanctions.

In 1992, according to Bloomberg, an anti-dumpling investigation prompted trade controls that affected how much low-enriched uranium Rosatom could supply to the U.S.. From 2002 to 2011, Rosatom had to stop commercial supplies to the U.S. For now, the Russian giant has long-term uranium delivery contracts with Centrus Energy Corp. ,NextEra Energy Resources and Exelon Generation Company LLC.

June 3, 2016 Posted by | marketing, Russia, USA | Leave a comment

China, South Korea and Russia battle to win Kenya as nuclear customer

fighters-marketing-1Africa Energy: China, Russia and South Korea In Race To Build Kenya’s Nuclear Plant
By Allan Akombo AFKI : June 2, 2016
– In less than 24 hours this week Kenya signed two pacts on nuclear energy cooperation with South Korea and Russia, setting the stage for a dead-heat race against China to clinch the east Africa nation’s forthcoming nuclear energy development contract.

The first deal was in Moscow on May 30, 2016 where Russia’s state nuclear agency, Rosatom Deputy Director Nikolai Spasskiy and Deputy Head of the Kenyan Embassy to Russia Hillary N. Kyengo signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that involves the creation of a working group to identify peaceful nuclear projects and also continue consultations on the possibility of building the first nuclear power plant in Kenya.

A day later and thousands of miles away in the Kenyan capital, Nairobi host President Uhuru Kenyatta and Korean President Park Geun-Hye witnessed the signing of a nuclear corporation pact after they held bilateral talks.

The MOU on electric power and nuclear energy development was signed by Energy and Petroleum Cabinet Secretary Charles Keter and Korean Trade, Industry and Energy Minister Joo Hyunghwan.

-…….The China General Nuclear Power Corporation operates third-generation HPR 1000 nuclear power plants. Russia offers a number of reactor designs, the most prominent currently being VVER-1200.

Barely two weeks ago, Rosatom said it plans to sign cooperation agreements with Kenya, Uganda and Zambia to lay the groundwork for an expanded presence in Sub-Saharan Africa beyond its planned bid to build nuclear power plants in South Africa.

Rosatom has voiced confidence in its ability to see off competition from China, France and South Korea in a planned South African tender to build a 9,600 megawatts (MW) nuclear power fleet in the continent’s most industrialized country.

It sees scope, however, for more deals across the region, from the building of plants to supplying reactor fuel.http://afkinsider.com/126827/africa-energy-china-russia-south-korea-race-build-kenyas-nuclear-plant/#sthash.f40J0946.dpuf

June 3, 2016 Posted by | Kenya, marketing | Leave a comment

USA’s Westinghouse in rush to sell nuclear reactors to India

Modi puppetnuclear-marketing-crapIndia, Westinghouse in advanced talks to close nuclear deal, live mint, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/DscD8CWjYrsVgpqQO7Fp1J/India-Westinghouse-in-advanced-talks-to-close-nuclear-deal.html  Valerie Volcovici, 2 June 16,

India’s ambassador to the US Arun Singh says the issues that remain to be worked out are related to cost and financing. Washington: Toshiba Corp.’s Westinghouse Electric and India are in “advanced discussions” for the company to build six nuclear reactors there, the country’s ambassador to the United States said on Wednesday, ahead of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s planned visit to Washington next week.

A deal with Westinghouse would be the first such contract reached under the 2008 US-India civil nuclear accord.

“There is a very detailed and advanced negotiation between Westinghouse and India,” Ambassador Arun Singh told reporters. “The issues that remain to be worked out are related to cost and financing.”

Progress on the deal to build six AP-1000 nuclear reactors is one of the key developments anticipated during the 7-8 June visit by Modi to Washington, where he will be hosted by President Barack Obama for a final summit before the US presidential election in November. Modi will address both houses of Congress.

The US and India agreed in 2008 to cooperate in the civil nuclear arena, but there have been no agreements yet to build any plants. Reuters reported on Tuesday that Westinghouse and India reached a breakthrough after officials said it will relocate the planned project in Andhra Pradesh. The original site proposed for the multi-billion-dollar project, in Modi’s home state of Gujarat, faced local opposition.

Another obstacle had been to bring India’s liability rules into line with international norms, which require the costs of an accident to be channelled to the operator rather than the maker of a nuclear power station.

That issue had been largely resolved to the satisfaction of the US government in January 2015 after the US and India reached a “breakthrough understanding” on nuclear cooperation.

Singh told reporters “to the best of my knowledge” insurance was no longer an issue in the discussions.

Westinghouse had hoped to clinch a deal to build six nuclear reactors in India by the end of March, during Modi’s last Washington trip to attend a global nuclear summit.

US lawmakers ratified the civil nuclear accord three years after it was struck in 2005, as part of an attempt to deepen the strategic relationship with India, but have expressed growing dismay over its failure to yield follow-on deals for US-based reactor makers. Reuters

June 3, 2016 Posted by | India, marketing, USA | Leave a comment

Russia and China working together to market nuclear reactors to the world

nuclear-marketing-crapRussia, China Working on Plan on Nuclear Cooperation Development. MOSCOW (Sputnik)  2 June 16 — Russia and China are working on a comprehensive document on the development of the bilateral strategic cooperation in the field of nuclear energy, the protocol of the Russia-China intergovernmental energy cooperation commission said.

The countries have joint energy projects, such as the Tianwan Nuclear Power Plant (NPP), and are working on expanding cooperation to this end……..  http://sputniknews.com/world/20160601/1040619141/russia-china-nuclear-plan.html#ixzz4ASijSOLB

June 3, 2016 Posted by | China, marketing, Russia | Leave a comment

China’s plans for floating nuclear power plants- major risks, good terrorism targets

While floating power plants may seem to present exciting economic opportunities–both for sites lacking affordable power and for the entities selling the plants—they also come with major risks.

“naval bombardment” is a growing risk in the South China Sea. A floating nuclear power plant might make a tempting target.

floating nuclear powership ChinaFloating nuclear power plants: China is far from first, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Dawn Stover , 2 June 16 On April 22, the state-owned Chinese newspaper Global Times reported that China plans to build as many as 20 floating nuclear power plants, the first of which could be producing power in just a few years. The story made a splash because the power from the floating reactors would most likely be used to accelerate construction of oil rigs and artificial islands in the South China Sea—already a source of border disputes and escalating tension between China and its neighbors.

Portable power stations may sound futuristic, but the idea is far from new. The United States launched the first floating nuclear power plant five decades ago, and Russia started its own construction project in 2000. Where the United States has seen a proprietary technology, though, China sees a marketing opportunity.

China floats an idea. Earlier this year, as part of its latest five-year plan, China’s National Development and Reform Commission approved the development of two nuclear reactors for marine platforms, one each from the country’s two big nuclear companies: The China General Nuclear Power Group will develop the ACPR50S, a small modular reactor with a generating capacity of 200 megawatts. Meanwhile, the China National Nuclear Corporation plans to work on the AC100S reactor, a marine version of its ACP100, which would generate 100 megawatts.

China General Nuclear has signed an agreement with China National Offshore Oil Corporation, which would presumably use floating nuclear power plants to provide power for offshore oil and gas exploration. China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation, the country’s largest shipbuilder, is building a barge-like platform for China General Nuclear’s pilot plant. An illustration of the platform looks very similar to Russian designs, which is not surprising. Only a few years ago, the Chinese were planning to build floating nuclear power plants in China using Russian technology; now the Chinese are floating their own designs………

Potential risks and rewards. Russia’s nuclear-powered icebreakers use highly enriched uranium, but the modified reactors for the Akademik Lomonosov will run on low-enriched uranium. That helps to alleviate concerns about proliferation, but environmental and safety concerns remain. A floating nuclear power plant would probably be safe from earthquakes, but storms could be a threat, and accident response would be slow in remote Arctic areas.

In the event of a nuclear accident, an offshore plant would have plenty of cooling water readily available. But a floating nuclear power plant might not have access to off-site backup power, and it would be more difficult to contain any radioactive releases than when an accident occurs at a land-based plant. A failed reactor might end up being abandoned at sea, as has happened to seven Soviet or Russian nuclear submarines.

Those risks aren’t preventing the Russians and Chinese from moving ahead with plans for floating nuclear power plants. Russia hopes to lease floating plants to other countries, and China sees an opportunity to capitalize on technologies originally developed by the United States and Russia…….

While floating power plants may seem to present exciting economic opportunities–both for sites lacking affordable power and for the entities selling the plants—they also come with major risks. As Bennett Ramberg, author of the book Nuclear Power Plants as Weapons for the Enemy: An Unrecognized Military Perilnoted in the Bulletin’s March 1986 issue: “[F]acilities can be placed on large lakes, inland seas, or oceans—on floating platforms surrounded by breakwaters, on floating vessels anchored to the marine floor, on artificial islands, or even undersea. However, there would be higher transmission costs for reactors, unique construction costs, and exposure to such dangers as ship collisions, accidental explosions, and naval bombardment.”

Thirty years later, “naval bombardment” is a growing risk in the South China Sea. A floating nuclear power plant might make a tempting target.

Editor’s note: The Bulletin’s archives from 1945 to 1998, complete with the original covers and artwork, can be found here. Anything after 1998 can be found via the search engine on the Bulletin’s home page.  http://thebulletin.org/floating-nuclear-power-plants-china-far-first9522

June 3, 2016 Posted by | China, safety | Leave a comment

Exelon gets employees to lobby for nuclear subsidies

taxpayer bailoutExelon to Close 2 Nuclear Sites; Still Pushing for Subsidies http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/exelon-close-illinois-nuclear-plants-39555124 By JOHN O’CONNOR, AP POLITICAL WRITER  SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — Jun 2, 2016 Exelon Corp. says it will shut two Illinois nuclear plants because of legislative inaction on state financial support, but the company is still lobbying for the plan.

An email obtained by The Associated Press that Exelon President and CEO Chris Crane sent to employees about Thursday’s decision also urged them to call a telephone number and record a message in favor of the legislators to be played for lawmakers and Gov. Bruce Rauner.

Exelon announced earlier Thursday it would close unprofitable plants in Clinton and the Quad Cities by 2018 after lawmakers adjourned without approving a plan for Exelon to share in state subsidies for carbon-free electric generation.

The telephone number’s greeting encourages employees to say immediate legislative action could save the plants.

Exelon spokesman Paul Adams confirmed the closure decision is not irreversible.

June 3, 2016 Posted by | politics, USA | Leave a comment

Exelon’s 2 nuclear plants nearly dead, but not quite

nuclear-dead-catExelon nuclear plant bill called dead, but some still pushing it, Herald Review LEE NEWS SERVICE Jun 1, 2016  SPRINGFIELD — A bill aimed at helping Exelon’s money-losing nuclear plants near Clinton and the Quad-Cities likely won’t make it out of the spring legislative session, but the company hasn’t yet confirmed it will close the two plants.

“The general consensus is that it’s dead for this session,” said Henry Marquard, director of government relations for the Quad-Cities Chamber of Commerce. He said he had spoken with an aide to the bill’s main sponsor, state Sen. Donne Trotter, D-Chicago, as well as others at the Capitol.

The News-Gazette of Champaign also reported that Trotter has pulled the plug on the bill proposing what Exelon calls the “Next Generation Power Plan,” saying time had run out with the scheduled end of the spring legislative session on Tuesday.

“We have not received any official word yet from Exelon,” said Clinton Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Marian Brisard in a statement Tuesday. “We would also urge our government officials to realize the seriousness of this issue and address it accordingly.”

Brisard said the Chamber will continue “supporting the efforts to keep the Clinton Power Station open.” ……. The bill also would establish a surcharge on utility customers that would help the nuclear plants, which Exelon said have lost more than $800 million over the past seven years, and change how some consumer rates are calculated.

Consumer groups and others have objected to the legislation, calling it a bailout for a profitable company. http://herald-review.com/news/state-and-regional/exelon-nuclear-plant-bill-called-dead-but-some-still-pushing/article_95462389-1769-5f47-8577-a48592e76025.html

June 3, 2016 Posted by | business and costs, USA | Leave a comment

Clinton Power Station and Quad Cities Generating Station – nuclear plants to close

Exelon to close 2 nuclear plants, news.com.au  3 June 16 Exelon Corp will shut two Illinois nuclear power plants after the state Legislature declined to act on the company’s request for financial support.

The Clinton Power Station in Clinton will close June 1, 2017, and the Quad Cities Generating Station in Cordova will close June 1, 2018, the Chicago-based power provider said in a news release on Thursday.

Exelon said it made the decision because the future is unclear for legislation which would extend state subsidies to nuclear power plants……

Exelon said it would continue to work to pass the legislation, known as the Next Generation Energy Plan.

The company said it would brief the Illinois governor’s office, state officials and community leaders……

The Clinton and Quad Cities locations are Exelon’s best-performing plants, but they’ve lost $US800 million ($A1.10 billion) over the last seven years, the company said…….http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/breaking-news/exelon-to-close-2-nuclear-plants/news-story/514a301601c870e58cf59c9b5f36ae46

June 3, 2016 Posted by | general | Leave a comment

Three Mile Island – another example of the dim future for nuclear power

nuke-plant-sad‘The future is dim’: Three Mile Island fails to sell future energy production, again, Penn Live,   By Christian Alexandersen | calexandersen@pennlive.com  “…….Eric Epstein, chairman of Three Mile Island Alert, said the marketplace has decided there are better energy options than nuclear power. Major investments have been made in solar and wind power, but not in nuclear.

Nuclear power, Epstein said, is just not economically competitive.

“There’s no private equity chasing nuclear power,” Epstein said. “When it comes to new construction, nuclear power plants are always over budget and behind schedule.”

DeSantis said Three Mile Island’s inability to sell its future energy production is significant. But, if it can’t sell its energy in the future, it will have to sell it on the daily energy market.

That’s where the prices have been historically low. The bottom barrel prices are due to the abundance of natural gas and flat demand for electricity.

“If you’re not getting capacity payments, then you’re only relying on the one revenue stream,” DeSantis said. “And prices are really low now.”

Epstein said he doesn’t believe Three Mile Island is in any immediate threat of closing down. However, nuclear power will be phased out by better energy alternatives over time, Epstein said.

Nuclear energy — like coal — will become a bridge fuel.

“I don’t know what the future holds, but the future is dim,” he said.http://www.pennlive.com/news/2016/06/the_future_is_dim_three_mile_i.html

June 3, 2016 Posted by | business and costs, USA | Leave a comment

Chile producing too much solar energy

Chile Has So Much Solar Energy It’s Giving It Away for Free , Bloomberg, 2 June 16 

  • Spot prices reached zero for 113 days this year through April
  • Solar power on Chile’s central grid quadrupled since 2013
  • Chile’s solar industry has expanded so quickly that it’s giving electricity away for free.

    Spot prices reached zero in parts of the country on 113 days through April, a number that’s on track to beat last year’s total of 192 days, according to Chile’s central grid operator. While that may be good for consumers, it’s bad news for companies that own power plants struggling to generate revenue and developers seeking financing for new facilities.

    Chile’s increasing energy demand, pushed by booming mining production and economic growth, has helped spur development of 29 solar farms supplying the central grid, with another 15 planned. Further north, in the heart of the mining district, even more have been built. Now, economic growth is slowing as copper output stagnates amid a global glut, energy prices are slumping and those power plants are oversupplying regions that lack transmission lines to distribute the electricity elsewhere………

  • Inadequate Infrastructure

    The government is working to address this issue, with plans to build a 3,000-kilometer(1,865-mile) transmission line to link the the two grids by 2017. It’s also developing a 753-kilometer line to address congestion on the northern parts of the central grid, the region where power surpluses are driving prices to zero…….

  • When power companies aren’t giving away electricity, it’s cheap. At the Diego de Almagro substation in the Atacama region, for example, prices didn’t exceed $60 a megawatt-hour for most of March. That’s less than the $70 minimum price for companies that won long-term contracts to sell solar power in Chile’s energy auctions in October and March……..http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-01/chile-has-so-much-solar-energy-it-s-giving-it-away-for-free

 

June 3, 2016 Posted by | renewable, SOUTH AMERICA | Leave a comment

Ontario Power Generation wants a whopping 69 per cent increase in price it gets for nuclear power

nuclear-costs1flag-canadaOPG applies for rate increases to fund nuclear station refurbishing Hamilton Spectator By Keith Leslie TORONTO, 2 June 16 — Ontario Power Generation has applied for a whopping 69 per cent increase in the amount it is paid for nuclear power over the next five years.

OPG says it needs the increase to help pay for the $12.8-billion refurbishment of the Darlington nuclear station, which the government announced in January to extend the life of the reactors by another 30 years.

The government-owned utility is also asking for a small increase — less than the rate of inflation — in the rate it’s paid for hydroelectric power……

The Ontario Clean Air Alliance says OPG’s application shows it wants nine cents a kilowatt hour for the power produced from Darlington, which is more expensive than the 8.6 cents a kWh it pays for wind power.

“Our electricity rates are already too high, and we shouldn’t increase them even further when we can actually lower our bills by choosing a cleaner and safer option,” said Alliance chair Jack Gibbons.

“Why are we putting our children at risk of a nuclear accident when there are lower-cost options?”

Gibbons said Ontario should also consider signing long-term contracts to import more clean, renewable electricity from Quebec to offset the nuclear generation……

In addition to the Darlington refurbishment, which is supposed to extend its life until 2050, OPG is also undertaking work to squeeze about four more years of life out of reactors at the Pickering nuclear generating station.

And Bruce Power is spending $13 billion to refurbish six reactors at the nuclear generating station it operates under contract to the government near Kincardine……

http://www.thespec.com/news-story/6702560-opg-applies-for-rate-increases-to-fund-nuclear-station-refurbishing/

June 3, 2016 Posted by | Canada, politics | Leave a comment

Strikes spread to all nuclear plants in France 

France’s union workers plan to begin rolling strikes in the power sector, including at all nuclear plants as part of nationwide protests against contentious labor reforms.

Members of the General Confederation of Labor (CGT) union voted to down tools at all 19 nuclear power plants on Thursday.

“All power production sites voted to strike from Thursday. All 19 nuclear plants voted for the strike. We will start cutting power output tonight from 1900 GMT,” said CGT union official Laurent Langlard……..http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2016/06/02/468549/France-CGT-EDF-nuclear-strike

June 3, 2016 Posted by | general | Leave a comment

Malfunction shuts down Pennsylvania nuclear power reactor

Pennsylvania nuclear power reactor shut down after malfunction By Kurt Bresswein | For lehighvalleylive.com   2 June 16 A malfunction in the coolant system at a nuclear reactor about 30 miles south of Allentown led to its temporary shutdown Wednesday, its owner reported. Operators at Exelon Corp.’s Limerick Generating Station removed Unit 2 from service about 9 a.m. after an electrical component malfunctioned in the reactor’s recirculating water pumps.

The pumps circulate water to regulate temperatures in Unit 2, one of two twin 1,200-megawatt reactors at Limerick. They are not required for safe shutdown, Exelon said in a news release Wednesday afternoon.

The malfunction and shutdown did not rise to any of the levels of emergency classification under the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, said Diane Screnci, spokeswoman for the agency.   As is the case at all 100 nuclear power plants in the United States, the NRC has resident inspectors at Limerick…….

The shutdown comes amid a stretch of warm weather that has air-conditioners buzzing throughout the region. PJM Interconnection, based like Limerick in Pennsylvania’s Montgomery County, says Wednesday’s shutdown is not expected to cause any power shortages……http://www.lehighvalleylive.com/news/index.ssf/2016/06/pennsylvania_nuclear_power_rea.html

June 3, 2016 Posted by | general | Leave a comment