Questions on safety of Chinese nuclear technology
Chinese nuclear safety must be fully scrutinized: but will it be in UK? http://drdavidlowry.blogspot.com.au/2016/01/chinese-nuclear-safety-must-be-fully.html?spref=fb Dr David Lowry, Letter to The Financial Times:
Your report on the industrial implications for the UK of the first proposed Chinese designed nuclear power plant (“Nuclear energy: Beijing’s power play,” December 30
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/789e5070-974a-11e5-9228-87e603d47bdc.html#axzz3veAp9lgD) rightly raised safety concerns.
While Guo Ruiting, China General Nuclear (CGN) Power Corp’s deputy chief engineer for the Taishan EPR-design nuclear plant near Hong Kong – which would be the ‘reference plant” for the projected new build plant at Hinkley Point in Somerset, – may be “bullish” in calling his reactor “ the safest,” other Chinese nuclear safety experts are not so sanguine about Chinese nuclear safety
Nuclear industry veteran Li Yulun, a former vice-president of CNNC (China National Nuclear Corp) observed two years ago “Our state leaders have put a high priority on [nuclear safety] but companies executing projects do not seem to have the same level of understanding.” (“China nuclear plant delay raises safety concern,” South China Morning Post, 7 October 2013,http://www.scmp.com/business/china-business/article/1325973/china-nuclear-plant-delay-raises-safety-concern
The world’s first AP1000 third-generation nuclear power plant – the competitor for the Taishan design – being built in Sanmen in China, has fallen behind schedule, and questions have increasingly been raised over its safety standards.
Just as the EPR and Japanese-design Advanced Boiling Water Reactor developed by Hitachi ( with US company GE) have had to undergo painstaking independent safety and security evaluation by the UK’s independent Office for Nuclear Regulation, so too will the Chinese nuclear plant design, in a process known as Generic Design Assessment.
This scrutiny may come as a rude shock to the Chinese nuclear plant manufacturers, who are used to what is effectively self-regulation inside China, as state-owned companies.
It will be especially interesting to see if the ONR subject the CGN reactor design to intrusive probing on its claimed security status, both in terms of physical robustness against external malevolent intrusion, and internally with its cyber security for its complex computer systems.
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (236)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment