A “little radiation” supposedly good for you – the “hormesis” argument for raising radiation safety limits
I’d never heard of hormesis until a reader alerted me to this issue on Monday. I know it’s not fair to conflate nuclear power and nuclear weapons, but the whole thing makes me think of the subtitle of Dr. Strangelove, Stanley Kubrick’s brilliant dark comedy about accidental nuclear war — How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb.
So a little radiation’s good for you? Hmmm … Democrat and Chronicle, Steve Orr, @SOrr111:30 November 17, 2015 “……The suggested rules are based on a scientific theory, known as radiation hormesis, which holds
that low-level radiation is not harmful to human health and may in fact be beneficial. Hormesis is the term for the circumstance where a small amount of an otherwise harmful substance is good for you in small doses. …….
current NRC regulations — that any exposure to ionizing radiation, the kind that can damage or alter human cells, is potentially unsafe. The gospel: Thou shalt fear all radiation.
With that in mind, current NRC regulations limit public exposure to radiation from power plants to 100 millirem a year. (Another measure of ionizing radiation dosage is millisieverts, or mSv. One mSv is the same as 100 millirem.) The idea is to limit radiation releases from nuclear plants to zero, of course, but very small amounts of radiation sometimes escape into the air or groundwater.
The average American is exposed to about 600 millirem a year from other sources such as radon and other naturally occurring materials, medical procedures and cosmic particles and rays.
The legal limit for nuclear power plant workers is 5,000 millirem a year, though higher doses are allowed in some circumstances…….The suggested new rules would make the limit for the general public the same as for workers — that is, 50 times higher than it is now. Fifty.
The suggested changes were advanced earlier this year in three petitions filed with the NRCby outside advocates for radiation hormesis…..You can read a great deal about this if you like. A good start would be this CounterPunch piece……
Anyone interested may submit comments online through the end of Thursday. The suggested rules are not a fait accompli; NRC spokesman Neil Sheehan said the agency will weigh the comments that are submitted, plus a great deal of other information, before deciding whether to draft actual proposed changes to the rules.
I’d never heard of hormesis until a reader alerted me to this issue on Monday. I know it’s not fair to conflate nuclear power and nuclear weapons, but the whole thing makes me think of the subtitle of Dr. Strangelove, Stanley Kubrick’s brilliant dark comedy about accidental nuclear war — How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb. http://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/local/blogs/environment/2015/11/17/more-radiation-exposure/75889896/
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (249)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment