Community speak ups forcibly to Panel on decommissioning of San Onofre nuclear plant
San Onofre panel hears from community Orange County Register 25 Mar 14,A Community
Engagement Panel tasked with helping guide Southern California Edison’s dismantling of the shuttered San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station got an earful from the public Tuesday night and raised questions of its own.
Most of the two dozen speakers who addressed the panel during a three-hour meeting at the San Clemente Community Center were activists urging the members to stress safety over efforts to save money……..
Edison appointed the panel to provide a public sounding board during what could be a 20-year decommissioning. Everyone agreed that safe storage of nuclear waste is the challenge, as the federal government hasn’t fulfilled a decades-old promise to provide permanent storage in a remote location.
“I’m concerned it will never be moved,” said San Diego County Supervisor Bill Horn, a panel member questioning how safe long-term on-site storage would be, particularly with I-5 and Southern California’s rail line close by.
“You, in my minds, are the guardians of the future of Southern California,” activist Marni Magda from Laguna Beach told the panel. Jenifer Massey of San Clemente and others suggested not waiting for the federal government and appealing instead to California to solve its own dilemma by establishing a remote site within the state……..
Palmisano described a process for decommissioning to nearly 200 people gathered at the Community Center.
“This is a huge engineering project,” said David Victor, chairman of the panel. “It seems to be as difficult to dismantle a plant as it is to build one in the first place.”
Victor said there will be some aspects where the panel can provide valuable input while other aspects will be constrained by the regulatory process – the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and California Public Utilities Commission.
Victor said the next meeting will be sometime in May at a site to be announced.http://www.ocregister.com/articles/panel-606987-san-community.html
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (335)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment