California will use mainly renewables to replace nuclear energy
California Mostly Sticks to Renewables to Replace Nuclear Energy http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/index.cfm/go/news.display/id/25596 20 Mar 14, While many feared California would turn to natural gas to replace the electricity from its shuttered San Onofre nuclear plant, the state is holding firm to its commitment to rely increasingly on renewable energy and efficiency.
In its final strategy, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) sticks to “preferred resources” to provide much of the electricity to the Los Angeles/ San Diego area: energy efficiency technologies such as demand response, upgrades to the grid, energy storage and renewable energy.
Under the plan, the two utilities must use at least 575 MW of “preferred resources” and 300-900 MW from “any source” which could be renewables or natural gas. They did approve 1500 MW of new natural gas last year, which environmental groups say is more than enough.
The Natural Resource Defense Council modeled the energy needed and found there’s no need for more natural gas because of 733 MW of lower energy consumption from building and appliance standards and utility efficiency programs. And since then, even more stringent appliance efficiency standards have been approved by the US Department of Energy for microwaves and commercial refrigerators.
Renewable sources could provide at least two-thirds of the energy and potentially 100% to replace the enormous 2.2 gigawatt nuclear plant, which delivered electricity 1.4 million homes, they say.
Besides the climate and health benefits associated with greater use of clean energy, the state will avoid building multiple natural gas plants. While nuclear provided emissions-free electricity, more gas plants would make it hard for California to meet its climate change targets and existing plants in the area already contribute to some of the dirtiest air in the US.
1 Comment »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- December 2025 (223)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



With thanks. Numerous info.