Opposition to uranium mining regroups
Uranium foes regroup: strategy is to attack mine at August hearing on water and tribal issues Rapid City Journal, 9 Mar 14 I n the wake of a recent setback for their cause, opponents of a proposed uranium mine near Edgemont are planning their strategy and gearing up for an August federal hearing, where they will attack the methods used by federal nuclear regulatory officials who have given initial approval to the mining plan………
Tribes raising concerns
The project, which would be about 15 miles northwest of Edgemont, would employ scores of in-situ mines — underground sites where the company would inject oxygenated water into the ground to absorb uranium. The water would then be pumped back to the surface, where uranium would be extracted and processed.
Mining opponents have a host of objections to the mine, but two main ones that will be heard in August deal with old Indian burial grounds and whether water polluted during the mining could spread through the region’s aquifers……..
Tribes raising concerns
The project, which would be about 15 miles northwest of Edgemont, would employ scores of in-situ mines — underground sites where the company would inject oxygenated water into the ground to absorb uranium. The water would then be pumped back to the surface, where uranium would be extracted and processed.
Mining opponents have a host of objections to the mine, but two main ones that will be heard in August deal with old Indian burial grounds and whether water polluted during the mining could spread through the region’s aquifers…….Aquifer questions
Parsons, the tribal attorney, said the project site also contains thousands of improperly closed boreholes from uranium exploration in the 1970s. He says that means the aquifers may not have “confined” the heavy metals activated by the mining so they do not stay within in a specific area……..http://rapidcityjournal.com/news/local/uranium-foes-regroup-strategy-is-to-attack-mine-at-august/article_55a915f5-893b-5041-abb3-ccf70d1b012d.html
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (293)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment