nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

Getting a bit tired of the thorium lobby’s repeated insults and lies

troll-nuclear

John Randall@thjr19  says:   “There is one & only one reason why @ChristinaMac1 opposes the _only_ substitute for fossil fuels. She is a paid shill for the FFI. #thorium

 

John Randall@thjr19  says: – “The only people I see arguing to _exclude_ tools in the toolbox are the likes of @ChristinaMac1 – paid shills of the fossil fuel industries.”

As  readers of this website will know, Arclight and Christina Macpherson are opposed not only to dangerous and polluting nuclear power, but also to fossil fuel industries. We, like so many thousands of others, work unpaid in the cause of a clean and safe planet. This website receives no funding of any kind from any source. If advertisements appear, that funding goes to our web page provider ( –  this website is free), not to us.

However, one comfort is that these lying attacks on us can only mean that we are having an impact in the fight against the heavily funded thorium nuclear reactor lobby.

February 23, 2014 - Posted by | Uncategorized

3 Comments »

  1. WIPP Plutonium Leak to Kill at Least 32,700 Americans
    Let me hit you point blank with the highlights of WIPP.

    Using the data already released, the Plutonium released can kill 32,700 Americans

    The amount in air is at least 810 TIMES BACKGROUND
    ————————————————————————————-

    Click to access erd104.pdf

    Above is the background level of Plutonium and Uranium in Air from the EPA.

    The WIPP Plutonium storage site, in collapsing and corrosive salt caves, had a significant release, which the experts said was “far below any level of concern”. They lied through their teeth.

    They tried to pretend that the human health hazard of Plutonium was only 100% from the ionizing radiation, and then used “radiation only” guidelines for whether the EPA would consider it an “action level”. In fact Plutonium’s real killing power if from it being an unnatural heavy metal, with radiation as a “bonus”.

    Therefore, when the scientists state that the amount detected is far below EPA action levels, they are lying through their teeth.

    Data and calculations are here. Spread the word

    http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2014/02/wipp-plutonium-leak-to-kill-at-least.html

    stock's avatar Comment by stock | February 23, 2014 | Reply

  2. 🙂

    arclight2011part2's avatar Comment by arclight2011part2 | February 23, 2014 | Reply

  3. Quote of Dr. Gordon Edwards: “When nuclear power was first presented to a credulous public, fully conditioned to respect science and admire scientists, people were quick to believe that nuclear power was safe, clean, cheap and inexhaustible — just because scientists said so. It was also said that “peaceful” nuclear power had nothing whatsoever to do with atomic bombs and the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

    It took decades for people to realize that these are all lies.

    I can’t believe that people are now so eager to swallow the hype about thorium
    with all its over-the-top claims of being safe, clean, cheap, inexhaustible, unrelated to nuclear weapons, and even a miraculous way of solving the nuclear waste problems created by the previous generation of — what? — safe, clean, cheap, inexhaustible, unrelated to nuclear weapons, nuclear reactors.
    As the old saying goes, “once burned, twice shy”. Or more explicitly, “Fool me
    once, same on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.”
    If thorium was such a good idea then its promoters would be more willing to tell
    the truth rather than to spin fairy tales about it.”

    quoted from: http://www.ccnr.org/think_about_thorium.pdf

    Dud's avatar Comment by Dud | February 27, 2014 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.