nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

Thorium is no solution to nuclear wastes

Thorium Fuel: No Panacea for Nuclear Power By Arjun Makhijani and Michele Boyd Institute for Energy and Environmental Research and Physicians for Social Responsibility

“…….Not a Waste Solution Proponents claim that thorium fuel significantly reduces the volume, weight, and long-term radiotoxicity of spent fuel. Using thorium in a nuclear reactor creates radioactive waste that proponents claim would only have to be isolated from the environment for 500 years, as opposed to the irradiated uranium-only fuel that remains dangerous for hundreds of thousands of years. This claim is wrong.

The fission of thorium creates long-lived fission products like technetium-99 (half-life over 200,000 years). While the mix of fission products is somewhat different than with uranium fuel, the same range of fission products is created. With or without reprocessing, these fission products have to be disposed of in a geologic repository.

If the spent fuel is not reprocessed, thorium-232 is very-long lived (half-life:14 billion years) and its decay products will build up over time in the spent fuel. This will make the spent fuel quite radiotoxic, in addition to all the fission products in it. It should also be noted that inhalation of a unit of radioactivity of thorium-232 or thorium-228 (which is also present as a decay product of thorium-232) produces a far higher dose, especially to certain organs, than the inhalation of uranium containing the same amount of radioactivity. For instance, the bone surface dose from breathing an amount (mass) of insoluble thorium is about 200 times that of breathing the same mass of uranium…..”http://ieer.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/thorium2009factsheet.pdf

January 24, 2014 - Posted by | Reference

2 Comments »

  1. Granted, I’m just a lay person, but this is contrary to most of what I’ve read. Does this apply to LFTR/MSR? I was under the impression that the amount of nuc waste was 1% of what comes from LWRs. I wish you nuc jocks could get your stories straight. Would Sorenson have an opposing view to this report?

    hebintn's avatar Comment by hebintn | January 25, 2014 | Reply

  2. http://energyfromthorium.com/ieer-rebuttal/

    Greg Barton's avatar Comment by Greg Barton | January 25, 2014 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.