Fukushima’s truth – too dire to be told?
Japan to issue gravest Fukushima nuclear warning in two years Toronto Sun, , AUGUST 21, 2013 03 TOKYO Comment They’re not even scratching the surface. Radioactive water has been leaking at the rate of 300 tonnes per day for two years now.
There are still more than 1,300 spent fuel rods on site, that have to be submerged in water in order to stay cool. They are still pumping millions of gallons of seawater onto these rods to keep them from going into meltdown. The more water they pump, the more radioactive water needs to be stored on site, and can (and does as we see now) end up leaking back into the ocean.
Some estimates (by nuclear professionals) claim it will take over 40 years to decommission these reactors, and even after that the site will still be uninhabitable.
The Nuclear ratings agencies aren’t telling us the truth because if we knew how dire it really was heads would roll. http://www.torontosun.com/2013/08/21/japan-to-issue-gravest-fukushima-nuclear-warning-in-two-years
1 Comment »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- December 2025 (268)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Why is it that some say the uncontrolled leak is 300 tonnes per day, while others say 400 tonnes, or even 800 tonnes per day?
Is this a “Metric” thing? Shouldn’t SI units be clearly included in publication to avoid any misconception?
Thank you again for another excellent article.