Duke Energy scraps plan to build Florida nuclear powerplant
![]()
Duke Energy won’t build Fla. nuclear plant News Observer August 1, 2013 By MITCH WEISS and TAMARA LUSH — The Associated Press ST. PETERSBURG, FLA. — Duke Energy is scuttling plans to build a $24.7 billion nuclear power plant in a small Gulf Coast county in Florida, the company announced Thursday.
In a news release sent late in the afternoon, Duke officials said the company made the decision because of delays by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in issuing licenses for new plants, and because of recent legislative changes in Florida. The proposed plant — and how the company was raising money for it — have been debated for some time in Florida.
Duke Energy Corp. has been charging its customers nuclear cost recovery fees for the two, planned 1,100-megawatt nuclear units in Levy County. Through these fees, Duke customers have paid $1.5 billion for the plant so far.
Florida State Rep. Mike Fasano, R-Pasco County, said Thursday that he wasn’t surprised by Duke’s announcement.
“I’ve been saying for years that Duke had no intention of building these power plants yet they continue charging the customers for it,” Fasano said. He’s tried for several years to repeal the cost recovery fee.
The state’s Public Service Commission and the state legislature should have “been more aggressive” with Duke and asked more questions, he said……….
The announcement comes just a few years after U.S. nuclear industry executives said they were on the cusp of a revival.
That revival fell short as new technology allowed drillers to tap more natural gas within the United States, which increased supplies and pushed down prices. In states where utilities operate as monopolies, they are reluctant to ask their regulators for permission to build enormously expensive nuclear plants, or even fix old ones, when building gas-fired factories is so cheap. In places where utilities sell power into the open market, the low prices don’t counter the financial risk of building expensive nuclear plants………….
, utilities have shuttered older plants. In June, Southern California Edison announced it would close its San Onofre plant rather than fix damaged equipment that critics said could never be safely replaced. The two reactors were idled in January 2012, when a small radiation leak led to the discovery of unusual damage to hundreds of new tubes carrying radioactive water.
Dominion Resources Inc. announced late last year it would close the Kewaunee Power Station in Wisconsin because it couldn’t find a buyer.http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/08/01/3075631/fla-rep-duke-energy-wont-build.html
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (249)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment