Lake Huron Canada Day anti nuclear waste protest 3 – 4 July 2013
Southampton nuclear-waste dump opponents plan protest http://www.therecord.com/news-story/3852700-southampton-nuclear-waste-dump-opponents-plan-protest/ SOUTHAMPTON — A grassroots group opposed to having high-level nuclear waste buried along the shores of this Lake Huron community will stage its second annual protest walk on the Canada Day weekend.
The walk’s purpose “is to re-engage the community with this issue and to keep pressure on council,” said Pat Gibbons, a member of Save Our Saugeen Shores, a local citizens’ group.
Last year’s walk during the same weekend drew more than 500 residents as well as tourists who gravitate to this area during the summer.
It was the largest protest to be held in any of the 21 communities across Canada that are vying to host an underground repository that will store all of the country’s most radioactive waste.
The group hopes this year’s protest will be larger, Gibbons said. It will start at the flagpole in Southampton at 11 a.m. on Saturday.
So far, the group has about 2,500 signatures on their petition.
The group’s main fear is that a nuclear dump could contaminate the drinking water for 40 million people living in the Great Lakes basin, said Gibbons, a retired vice-principal from St. Mary’s High School in Kitchener who now lives in Southampton.
Of the 21 communities vying for this $16-million project, five are in Bruce County where Canada’s largest nuclear power plant is located.
The Bruce Nuclear power plant near Kincardine, which is the largest employer in Bruce County, has about 40 per cent of Canada’s used fuel already stored at its site.
All five Bruce County communities interested in the project are at Stage 3 of a nine-stage process which could take up to 10 years to complete. Stage 3 involves an in-depth feasibility study.
Mike Smith, mayor of Saugeen Shores — which consists of the towns of Southampton and Port Elgin — said the community is split on the issue. Some residents say it would create jobs and others say it would decrease property values.
Smith said even the town’s nine councillors are split on the issue, with some publicly saying if they had to vote today on the project, “they would vote no.”
Smith, a retired 34-year employee of the Bruce plant, said he’s undecided on the project.
“I want to learn more about it,” he said.
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (277)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment