3 year study of cancers near nuclear facilities: where are the results?

Nuclear Powered Cancer Clusters By Roger Witherspoon April 7, 2010 For the past 20 years, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has used an epidemiologically invalid study to reassure the public that the continuous release of radioactive material from power plants into the surrounding regions did not contribute to increases in cancer.
To correct that unsubstantiated claim, the NRC has contracted with the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a two year study of both cancer incidence and mortality around former, current, and proposed nuclear reactor sites. The $5 million study, which is expected to take a year to design and two more years to complete, would be the first, comprehensive, government study of the health implications of the continuous release of radioactive into the air and water around nuclear facilities.
It would replace the 1990 study conducted for the NRC by
the National Institutes of Health – National Cancer Institute titled
“Cancer in Populations Living Near Nuclear Facilities.” That study
concluded that the continuous release of radioactive gas, liquids, and
particles – both intentionally and accidentally – did not contribute
to the cancer mortality rates in the counties surrounding the 62
reactor sites housing 107 reactors. From an epidemiological
standpoint, that study was flawed in its conception and
implementation, and hampered by a dearth of data…….
Commercial nuclear power plants markedly differ from U.S. Navy
nuclear vessels in the way they handle radioactive emissions. If Navy
vessels simply pumped their radioactive gasses into the air, in time
the accumulations in the ship would be so great that it would be a
multi billion dollar, radioactive, uninhabitable relic of a warship.
The Navy stores their waste until it can be properly disposed of. But
that is a cost commercial operations avoid.
The new NRC health impact study will look for cancers in
age groupings of 0-5, 0 – 10, 10 – 19, 20 – 39, 40 – 59, and 60 –
older years. It will study both the incidence and mortality from
Leukemia and A-Leukemia; Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas;
multiple myeloma; the digestive organs including stomach, colon,
rectum and liver; the trachea, bronchus and lungs; the prostate,
uterus and ovaries; breast, thyroid, bone and joints; bladder; brain
and central nervous system; and both benign and in-situ
neoplasms.http://spoonsenergymatters.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/nuclear-powered-cancer-clusters/
1 Comment »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- December 2025 (277)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


I happened to be watching this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6FdtWXOijU
and when the CDC map in the image linked below came up. It was quite a shocker as I knew the cancer clusters matched the locations of nuclear plants. I screen shotted it and pasted a map showing nuclear plant locations.
I wrote the NRC chairman to ask if this study has come out and if not when it is expected but I doubt I will get a reply..