Japan nuclear safety protocols still fall short, investigators say
Published Monday, April 8, 2013 6:33AM EDT

TOKYO — Experts who investigated Japan’s nuclear crisis say a watchdog’s oversight of the crippled plant’s operator is still too lax.
The Fukushima Dai-ichi plant has been plagued with glitches. A blackout last month left the plant’s fuel storage pools without cooling for more than a day. Last Friday another cooling failure occurred, and hours later the operator reported a massive contaminated water leak from underground tanks.
The investigators said Monday that the Nuclear Regulation Authority is only rubber-stamping work by operator Tokyo Electric Power Co. at the plant that runs on makeshift equipment.
Nine of the 10 members testified at a lower house nuclear committee for the first time since releasing their findings in July. The report called the March 2011 disaster “manmade,” and blamed regulator-operator collusion and botched crisis management.
FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENT: ‘RESULT OF COLLUSION’
Thursday, 5 July 2012
- “The accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant cannot be regarded as a natural disaster.”
- “It was a profoundly manmade disaster — that could and should have been foreseen and prevented.”
- “…a multitude of errors and wilful negligence…”
- “It’s fundamental causes are to be found in the ingrained conventions of Japanese culture: our reflexive obedience; our reluctance to question authority; our devotion to ‘sticking with the program’; our groupism; and our insularity.”
- “The accident was the result of collusion between the government, the regulators and TEPCO, and the lack of governance by said parties.”
- “TEPCO was too quick to cite the tsunami as the cause of the nuclear accident and deny that the earthquake caused any damage.”
- “The residents’ confusion over the evacuation stemmed from the regulators’ negligence.”
- “The government and regulators are not fully committed to protecting public health and safety; that they have not acted to protect the health of the residents and to restore their welfare.”
- “The safety of nuclear energy in Japan and the public cannot be assured unless the regulators go through an essential transformation.”
- “Replacing people or changing the names of institutions will not solve the problems.”
http://www.ourmaninabiko.com/2012/07/fukushima-nuclear-accident-result-of.html
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (29)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS




Leave a comment