Campaigners hit out at reports today that the government is to offer huge subsidies to energy firms building a new generation of nuclear power stations in breach of its coalition pledge.

The 2010 coalition agreement promised that there would be no public cash for new nuclear power stations but reports today indicated that ministers were proposing to guarantee firms subsidies for up to 40 years.

It is believed the U-turn is a response to a number of firms, most recently Centrica, pulling out of planned projects.

According to the Guardian ministers are planning to extend contracts from the previously proposed 20 years to 30 or 40 years in a bid to keep the guaranteed wholesale cost per unit of energy to below £100 per megawatt hour.

The paper quoted industry sources as saying that the likely price per unit from the first planned project – the building of two 1.6 gigawatt reactors at Hinckley Point by EDF – would be just under £100 per MWH, more than double the market price for electricity.

Labour MP for Newport Paul Flynn said on Twitter: “(Energy Secretary) Ed Davey says there will be nuclear subsidies – enormous ones. But it’s a secret until it is too late to change.”

Britain was “being secretly seduced into a hideous nuclear black hole that could rob us for 50 years,” he added.

Friends of the Earth’s energy campaigner Guy Shrubsole said: “This latest government U-turn is a double blow for the climate and the economy.

“New nuclear could end up costing consumers tens of billions of pounds and will saddle future generations with hazardous waste.”

http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/news/content/view/full/129646

EDF in talks with Ministers about 40-year contracts for nuclear

The French-owned company is in talks with Ministers over ‘contracts for difference‘ funding, under which the Government guarantees generators will be paid a minimum price for electricity from new nuclear plants: if the market price falls lower than this ‘strike price’ then a surcharge will be added to customers’ bills; if it rises higher there would be a refund.

The Guardian reported on Tuesday that in order to keep the strike price at below the politically crucial £100 a megawatt hour, Ministers and officials are proposing the contracts will last for up to 40 years, double the original timescale. On Tuesday, it emerged that EDF’s chairman, Henri Proglio, told analysts and investors that the company was in talks over 40-year contracts when the company published its annual results in Paris last week.

The UK’s Department of Energy and Climate Change (Decc) said on Monday no final agreement had been reached. However insiders acknowledge such long deals could have trouble passing both EU state aid rules, and nuclear critics who are already angry the Government has reneged on a promise that there would be no public subsidy for new nuclear power.

Pressure on Ministers to get a deal with EDF was highlighted on Tuesday when Alistair Buchanan, head of the energy regulator, Ofgem, warned that UK customers face higher bills for years to come as gas imports rise to replace ageing power stations taken out of service.

In an attack on previous policy, Buchanan said the situation had arisen because of “the car crash of a policy-driven vision of sustainability and the environment from 2004-2008 – that needed massive sums of money backing nascent technologies – smashing into the financial crisis.”

Energy experts said longer contracts for new nuclear power would help bring the price guarantee down from early estimates of £140-160 per unit to under £100, and bring down the overall cost because they would reduce risk and make it cheaper for EDF to borrow the estimated £12-£16 billion building cost.

“At the moment that certainty would appear to be more of a benefit to the owner-operator of a new plant, but clearly the Government needs to get things moving on generation new builds,” said Martin Young, head of European utilities research at Nomura. “It would support the Government’s low carbon policy and reduce the volatility in power prices.”

But Ministers could also face a headache if energy companies demand similar subsidies to build new gas plants.

“This is a real possibility because the incentive to build new gas power plants is lost if market prices are distorted by significant nuclear capacity supported by very rich contracts for difference,” said Nigel Robinson, head of power advisory at Investec bank.

According to Ofgem, gas is likely to double to 60 per cent to 70 per cent of power generation by the end of this decade.

Buchanan said reserve margins for generation capacity were set to fall from 14 per cent to five per cent within three years, though he played down the threat of power cuts to households because many energy-intensive industries have contracts that stipulate their supply can be cut at times of peak demand.

His warnings are a challenge to the Chancellor, George Osborne, who has promoted a ‘dash for gas’ as the way of keeping the lights on and keeping energy bills low for consumers and businesses.