Sign the Petition: Fukushima Mom calls for the Fukushima Local Government to Continue Housing Support
Click here to Sign the Petition calling for the Governor of Fukushima to Continue housing support for Fukushima refugees!

I’m a mom who lives in Fukushima, Japan. I have a daughter in middle school and a son with disabilities. When my daughter moved up to high school, my family had planned to move out of Fukushima because we were worried about the effect of radiation on my kids’ health.
Since 3.11, the state government has provided housing support to refugees displaced by the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident. But the government recently announced that it will end rent assistance to families who move outside of Fukushima – while keeping it for anyone who stays.
On the same day that I learned Fukushima had decided to stop support for people moving away, I received notice that my son’s exam for thyroid cancer had revealed small tumors. (An A2 rating for the thyroid cancer test indicates growths or tumors from 5.0 to 20 mm in size.) I’m shocked and scared — and I worry about how the radiation is affecting my kids.
Many families in Fukushima are juggling difficult decisions, made worse by fears about radiation — whether to keep their kids in a school with classmates they know, or leave behind their homeland of generations and move away. The state’s housing support is what enables many families who couldn’t otherwise afford it, the chance to move away.
In a recent poll conducted by the city of Fukushima, 90% of Fukushima residents said they were “somewhat worried” or “very worried” about the impact of radiation on the health of their family members. And nearly half of families with young kids said that “even now, they would like to move away” due to fears about radiation.
The law that is the basis for providing this housing assistance was in place for five years after the Hanshin Awaji earthquake in 1995. It has been less than two years since 3.11, and given the crisis at the Fukushima nuclear power plants, continuing to provide rental support for families who want to move out of the prefecture is critical.
The government attempted to end assistance to families moving out of state last year in December, but reversed its decision following a public outcry.
With your support, I believe we should be able to reverse their decision again this time.
Thank you so much for your support.
Tokiko Noguchi Fukushima, Japan
References
※1 An A2 rating for the thyroid cancer test indicates growths or tumors from 5.0 to 20 mm in size
※2 Results from Fukushima City poll
http://www.city.fukushima.fukushima.jp/soshiki/7/kouchou12090501.html
※3 Increased radiation exposure for kids in Fukushima/Nihonmatsu due to more time spent outside
http://mainichi.jp/select/news/20121124k0000m040081000c.html
※4 Fukushima to no longer provide rental support (Yomiuri Shimbun)http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/e-japan/yamagata/news/20121107-OYT8T01431.htm
※5 Homepage of Fukushima Prefectural Government – Latest thyroid cancer results
http://www.pref.fukushima.jp/imu/kenkoukanri/241118koujyousen.pdf
キャンペーンの日本語版はこちらです。
The Petition Statement
To:
Mr. Sato Yohey, Governor of Fukushima
Fukushima Prefectural Government, Refugees Assistance Group
Mr. Tatsuo Hirano, Reconsruction Minister
Labor Minister
Fukushima Prefectural Government, Refugees Support & Nuclear Accident Reparations Group
The Fukushima prefectural government announced on Nov. 5th, 2012, that it would no longer be accepting new applications for families who want to receive housing assistance if they choose to move out of the prefecture. This means that after Dec. 28th, 2012, families who are living outside of mandatory evacuation areas will no longer be able to receive support for housing.
The housing support program is critical for families who have been forced to flee their homes as a result of the nuclear accident at Fukshima.
Please do not curtail this important program. What is called for now is not a diminishing of support for Fukushima residents, but an expansion.
Even now, in many areas, airborne radiation levels are higher than the publicly acknowledged limit of 1mSv. Citizen groups in Fukushima have conducted radiation tests of the soil, in cities, and along waterways, and there have been reports of radioactive cesium reaching levels higher than 100,000Bq/kg. This is very high levels of contamination (see footnote 2).
A poll conducted by Fukushima City showed that 80% of residents were “very worried” or “somewhat worried” about the impact of internal and external radiation poisoning. ⅓ of those polled, and half of those with young children in their families, stated that “even now, they would like to move away” due to fears about radiation.
On June 21st, a law was passed stipulating that in areas where radiation levels are above acceptable limits, the state will support residents’ in their decision about whether to stay or move away from the area. While implementation of this law will still take some time, it is critical that there be no ‘break’ in support for Fukushima families and the housing assistance program continued in its current state for the foreseeable future.
Fukushima Prefecture cited the declining number of families who have been moving out of prefecture as a reason for ending its support. However, there is reason to believe families cannot move because there is inadequate assistance — not because they do not want to. (Footnote 3) In addition, this declining number is no reason to cut off support for families who still require it.
We call on the Fukushima prefectural government to continue to provide housing support and do everything in your power to provide aassistance to refugees of the Fukushima nuclear accident, as stipulated in the law.
In addition, we would like to thank the Fukushima prefectural government for continuing to provide housing assistance for families who want to move to areas within the prefecture with lower radiation levels. The Labour Ministry should also continue to provide the same assistance to those families not living in evacuation areas out of the National Treasury.
We thank you for your timely response.
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (293)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment