Norway confirms great potential for CO2 storage but is a bit of a climate skeptic?
“…Bellona does however question the Norwegian Government’s reluctance to implement the EU CCS Directive (2009/31/EC). Norway thereby joins a club of only a handful of the EU’s 27 Member States, led by the climate-sceptical Poland. The Directive has been deemed EEA relevant, which adds a clear pressure to move forward in implementing it, but it seems obvious that the Norwegian Government are using unnecessary delaying tactics in order to avoid doing so…”
http://priceofoil.org/2009/07/02/exxon-still-funding-sceptics/
The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD) states in a new report, released on 25 January, that significant amounts of CO2 can be stored in the Norwegian Sea. The potential for safe storage of CO2 in the Norwegian parts of the North Sea could amount to 5.5 gigatonnes.Sirin Engen, 25/01-2013
Although the potential for storing very large amounts of CO2 in the Norwegian Sea was already well-known, as seen in the “CO2 Storage Atlas” from December 2011 for example, a final confirmation from the NPD qualifying this is very welcome.
The quantified amount of 5.5 gigatonnes is more than 100 times Norway’s total CO2-discharge in 2012.
Potential and opportunities for the EU
Bellona regards this as very good news in a European perspective as well, particularly due to the fact that fears relating to CO2 storage erode public support for CCS. In addition, the EU Energy Roadmap 2050 clearly states that the role of fossil fuels in Europe will be dependent on the implementation of CCS. The positive prospective for storage discovered in the Norwegian Sea could play a vital role in managing CO2 emissions in Europe by offeringstorage space to European countries that are lacking in this capacity.
Norwegian hesitation
Bellona does however question the Norwegian Government’s reluctance to implement the EU CCS Directive (2009/31/EC). Norway thereby joins a club of only a handful of the EU’s 27 Member States, led by the climate-sceptical Poland. The Directive has been deemed EEA relevant, which adds a clear pressure to move forward in implementing it, but it seems obvious that the Norwegian Government are using unnecessary delaying tactics in order to avoid doing so.
A Norway that chooses to take part in the international development of CCS could be proven very positive. The country already has valuable experience from Sleipner relating to the financial responsibility for stored CO2. Such expertise can be of great benefit to the EU, Canada and other countries in the world that are attempting to develop CCS demonstration projects.
The way forward
The NPD plans to map out the entire Norwegian shelf, particularly the Barents Sea, in search of suitable areas for CO2 storage.
http://www.bellona.org/articles/articles_2012/1359128467.64
Read more about CO2 storage on Bellona’s CCS web.
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (236)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



Leave a comment