Mysterious evacuation of Isfahan’s 1.5 million residents near Iran nuclear site

Evacuation of large Iranian city near nuclear site raises eyebrows, legalinsurrection, by Bryan Jacoutot , January 4, 2013 An edict was An edict was issued on Wednesday by Iranian authorities ordering Isfahan’s 1.5 million residents to leave the city because pollution in the area “has reached emergency levels.”

Skeptical of Iran’s explanation for the evacuation, some believe it to have been prompted by more than just your average pollution. (h/t Uncle Samuel)… “Mass evacuations suggest a far more serious problem,” Rubin explained. “There are two possibilities here: There is a radiation leak and the regime is lying or there is really bad pollution and no one believes the regime’s explanations.”….. http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/01/evacuation-of-large-iranian-city-near-nuclear-site-raises-eyebrows/

January 5, 2013 - Posted by Christina Macpherson | Iran, secrets,lies and civil liberties

3 Comments »

Not sure how mysterious this is. While I do not agree with nuclear power in principle, what is blatantly obvious is that the Zionist Power Configuration is pointing the finger (middle finger) at Iran all the while ignoring Izrayhell’s nuke weapon capacity. The New York Times wrings its hands over a potential danger of Iran building a plant near a faultline but is mum about Fukushima or Japan’s nuclear debacle, all the while ignoring the US sailors who were exposed (as far as I know at this point). The double standard is obvious. Take a look at the 1967 attack by Israel on USS Liberty for a comparison.

At least those evil Iranians care enough about their citizens to evacuate them, unlike the Japanese government who are the good guys and our allies in the push for a One World Talmudically Run Order.

Comment by Richard Wilcox | January 6, 2013 | Reply
Mr. Wilcox, I have to agree the truth of the present danger and past exposure to radiation are being withheld. One very good reason however for a double standard concerning proliferation is the stated intent of the Ahmadinejad regime. Israel has not voiced any intent to eliminate any enemy completely, nor encourage an apocalyptic confrontation.

Comment by Glen | January 7, 2013 | Reply
- Regrettably, Mr Wilcox has anti semitic views, colouring his analysis of the Israel-Iran situation.
  Equally regrettably, Ahmadinejad has voiced strongly anti-Israel views. However, the “stated intent of the Ahmadinejad regime” is very much open to interpretation. Ahmadinejad’s concept of “no place for the Jewish state in a future Middle East.” can be interpreted as a wish for an ISRAELI state, rather than a JEWISH state.
  
  That’s a concept with which many, including some Jews, would agree. I for one, cannot understand why Israeli leaders insist on calling the place “A Jewish State”. They’ve got Muslims, and Christians and atheists , and who knows what else living there. Not everybody in Israel is Jewish. Why can’t Israel be a secular State, like plenty of other countries are – with recognition of all religions?
  Meanwhile, Ahmadinejad and other Iranese leaders have repeatedly rejected nuclear weapons as inhuman. But the world watches as Israel’s government continues to threaten a nuclear war, and maintains the secrecy over its nuclear arsenal.
  
  Comment by Christina MacPherson | January 7, 2013 | Reply