Coal Seam Gas – its “fugitive” greenhouse gas emissions are not measured
the sources, and perhaps also the volumes, of fugitive methane releases may differ from those associated with conventional gas production, and that consequently different approaches to the measurement of fugitive emissions may be required.”
CSG worries hinge on timing of climate change, ABC News 10 Dec 12 by Wendy Carlisle for Background Briefing “……..Fugitive emissions Professor Hultman’s paper was cited by the oil and gas lobby group APPEA in their submission to the Federal Government’s review into the way in which fugitive emissions from coal seam gas are measured.
APPEA has consistently said coal seam gas is 70 per cent cleaner than coal.
But in September the Government released a report which found that the absence of published information about fugitive emissions – greenhouse gases that leak into the atmosphere during the extraction process – was a matter of “public policy concern”.
The Pitt & Sherry report recommended the Government begin a research process to examine “the relative magnitude of the various individual sources” of fugitive emissions.
“Extraction of [coal seam gas] and shale gas differs from the extraction of conventional natural gas in two important ways,” the report said.
“First, many more wells are drilled for a given volume of gas production.
“Second, much more extensive use is made of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) of the gas-bearing rock strata, to release the gas.
“Because of these reasons, it is thought likely that the sources, and perhaps also the volumes, of fugitive methane releases may differ from those associated with conventional gas production, and that consequently different approaches to the measurement of fugitive emissions may be required.”
Earlier this week the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency announced it would be working with CSIRO to conduct field research into fugitive emissions from coal seam gas in 2013.
APPEA issued a statement saying it supported “independent research to better inform development of revised emission factors and methodologies that better reflect Australian gas production operations.”
Professor Hultman’s paper, The greenhouse impact of unconventional gas for electricity generation, was published in Environmental Research Letters (2011). http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-12-09/background-briefing-coal-seam-gas/4416808
Wendy Carlisle’s full report, The missing emissions, can be downloaded from the Background Briefing website.
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (301)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment