What a really poor investment looks like- Nuclear
“So i went to the NEI blog. This is where the nuclear lobby takes on its critics. Amory Lovins, Helen Caldicott, Paul Gunter and their work all gets attacked here. Not a word about Doug Koplow or this report.”
link to report here..
http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/nuclear_power/nuclear_subsidies_report.pdf
27 november 2012
by Paxus
Recently, the congress and the Obama administration has approved what could be up to $225 million in federal funding for a new generation of reactor design called Small Modular Reactors. I am working on a blog post on this particular topic and in doing research on it, i have come across a report which is worth it’s own blog post.
Nuclear Power: Still not viable without subsidies is a 146 page report that you can download. But let me save most of you the work by giving you this key disturbing statistic which comes up in the first few pages of this pretty accessible document.
Between 1960 and 2009 the total subsidy for nuclear power plants in the US works out to US$ 0.072/kwh which is 140% of the wholesale cost of electricity during that period.
In other words, the amount of money the government has paid for these reactors to exist and operate exceeds significantly the value of the electricity they produced.
Put even more simply, from an economics perspective we would be way ahead if we had never build these reactors at all. The money was wasted.
This is what a poor investment looks like
The author of this 2011 report for the Union of Concerned Scientists is Doug Koplow. He has been working on energy subsides for 20 years and has an MBA from Harvard.
So i went to the NEI blog. This is where the nuclear lobby takes on its critics. Amory Lovins, Helen Caldicott, Paul Gunter and their work all gets attacked here. Not a word about Doug Koplow or this report.
Industry and government refuse to read the business press on nuclear
h/t http://funologist.org/2012/11/27/what-a-really-poor-investment-looks-like/
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- January 2026 (118)
- December 2025 (358)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS





Leave a comment