U.S. sues Fluor over misuse of nuclear site funds for lobbying
11/8/2012COMMENTS (0)
By Braden Reddall
Nov 8 (Reuters) – The U.S. government has taken over a lawsuit alleging that engineering company Fluor Corp misused federal funds to lobby for more money for a nuclear materials training facility that it managed.
The Justice Department said on Thursday it had intervened in the case brought by whistleblower Loydene Rambo in federal court against Fluor Hanford Inc and its parent company. Fluor had a prime contract at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Hanford Nuclear Site in southeastern Washington state from 1999 to 2008.
Under the False Claims Act that authorizes people to sue on behalf of the United States and share in any recovery, Rambo says Fluor breached contractual restrictions by using DOE money to lobby officials for more funding for the Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response (HAMMER) Center in Hanford.
The company said it “vigorously denies” the allegations.
Rambo, a former Fluor employee, alleges the lobbying took place between 2005 and 2008 and that the Irving, Texas-based company used lobbying firms Secure Horizons LLC and Congressional Strategies LLC, which were paid with DOE funds.
“The allegations set forth in the whistleblower complaint are troubling and very serious,” Michael Ormsby, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Washington, said in a statement.
The government can come in to whistleblower lawsuits if it believes they have merit. The Justice Department said it had intervened with respect to Fluor, not the two lobbying firms.
“The taxpayer money Congress allocated for this program was for training federal emergency response personnel and first responders, not to lobby Congress and others for more funding,” said Stuart Delery, acting assistant attorney general for the civil division of the Department of Justice.
The claims in the case are allegations only, with no determination of liability, the Justice Department said.
“Fluor is aware of the action announced by the Department of Justice, and the company vigorously denies the allegations in the Hanford case,” a Fluor spokesman said.
The case is “U.S. ex rel. Rambo v. Fluor Hanford, et al.” in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, No. cv-11-5037.
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (301)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment