Japan authorities passing the buck on decision-making about nuclear restart
Government tries to duck reactor-restart decisions Fujimura hints decision rests with new body, Japan Times By MASAMI ITO, 7 October 12, Chief Cabinet Secretary Osamu Fujimura suggested Thursday that the central government does not have the ultimate say, or responsibility, in reactivating nuclear reactors, triggering confusion over who is in charge of making the decision.
At a news conference, Fujimura repeatedly stressed that the new Nuclear Regulation Authority is in charge of assessing the safety of reactors and that power companies are only tasked with explaining reactor restarts to host municipalities and seeking their consent.
But Fujimura refused to clarify the government’s precise role in the process, saying only that once the safety of a reactor has been confirmed by the NRA, it will be brought back online.”As I have
repeatedly stated, confirming the safety of reactors is the most
important thing when considering a reactivation, and the NRA is in
charge of making a decision over their safety as an independent
entity,” Fujimura said. “The government has decided to utilize nuclear
reactors that have been confirmed as a safe source of power.”
But Fujimura repeatedly refused to give a straight answer when asked
whether the government is ultimately responsible for approving reactor
restarts, reiterating that units judged to be safe would be “used as a
source of energy.”
“In terms of giving approval, that duty has shifted from the trade
minister and the (now-defunct) Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency to
the regulatory committee that is now in charge of authorizing” reactor
restarts, Fujimura said, dumping the responsibility squarely on the
NRA.
But this view was flatly contradicted by the NRA just a day before,
when its new head, Shunichi Tanaka, stated that its responsibility is
to scientifically assess the safety of nuclear reactors and that
ultimate responsibility to authorize restarts does not lie with the
nuclear watchdog.
Restarting reactors “is a major decision that must be made by
somebody, and I believe that our safety assessment plays an important
role in making that judgement,” Tanaka said. “But to reactivate the
reactors, there are various issues to consider, including gaining
permission from local residents and municipal officials, and that is
beyond the bounds of our authority.”……
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (213)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



Leave a comment