Russia planning UNMANNED long-range nuclear strategic bombers.
Russia’s Unmanned Strategic Nuclear Bomber Is A Really Terrible Idea http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2012/09/russias-unmanned-strategic-nuclear-bomber-is-a-really-terrible-idea/
The PAK-DA would be a standard nuclear bomber, with a on-board human crew controlling it. The next step, however, opens a potentially lethal and morally questionable Pandora’s Box. Lt General Anatoly Zhikharev — the commander for that branch of the Russian Air Force — says that they are thinking about a sixth generation to enter service “around 2040-2050″: unmanned long-range nuclear strategic bombers.
Somehow, the idea of having those birds in the sky makes me extremely nervous. You know, long range planes capable of flying for hours with a few nuclear bombs in their belly, with their wireless communication links ready to be intercepted and deciphered by hackers. Sure, the latter would be hard, but when it comes to computer security, there’s nothing impossible.
But regardless of potential accidents or security issues, I just can’t see the point of these or any other strategic bombers right now. Just like Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin was saying before being slapped by Putin, “these aircraft will not get anywhere. Not ours, not theirs [the Americans]. With modern air defence systems, these targets will be destroyed on the way.”
He’s right. While a country like Iran can’t defend itself against stealth bombers, you can be sure that both the Russians and the Americans would be able to intercept any air attack. Which is precisely why the USAF is trying to develop ultra-sonic scramjets that could be silently launched as an alternative to easily-detectable Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles launches.
And if none of the two superpowers — well, there’s China there, quickly ramping up but still behind US and Russian military technology — are going to attack each other, what’s the point of keeping up with this stupid soft armament race, anyway? [RIA Novosti via DEW Line ]
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (346)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment