China to be in charge of Britain’s new nuclear power?
The potential for political conflict has been highlighted … “They [the Chinese] will be inside the system, with access to the intricate architecture of the UK’s National Grid and the processes through which electricity supply is controlled, as well as to the UK’s nuclear technology.”
Security fears shelved amid China nuclear bid FT.com By Jim Pickard, Anousha Sakoui and Rebecca Bream, 19 Aug 12
“……..the attempt [China’s} to buy into Britain’s nuclear programme marks a significant change of gear. Not only will this be the first investment into new build projects in the UK – as opposed to takeovers of existing assets – it is also in a controversial sector.

For China, the project provides an opportunity to showcase its expertise in an OECD country. “If you can be at the top table in the UK, that’s a great selling point around the world,” said one of the people close to the Horizon project…….
Chinese nuclear companies would be using western nuclear technology in the UK, such as reactors designed and manufactured by Areva and Westinghouse, with their involvement focused on the construction and running of power stations.
The British government says the Horizon deal is a matter for the owners, Eon and RWE , the German utilities. However, some UK officials are closely involved and are aware that any bid would have to be acceptable to politicians and the public.
This sensitivity explains why officials would prefer the Chinese bidders not to hold majority equity stakes in Horizon and have ensured that they have partnered with companies from other countries. Yet the billions of pounds required to fund the construction of new nuclear plants – likely to come from Chinese lenders – means that in reality the successful consortium could be dominated by Beijing.
“They really are desperate to get this deal off the ground,” said one person familiar with the talks. “If the Chinese are the only option then they have no choice, but that doesn’t mean people aren’t uneasy.”
That sense of urgency reflects the growing doubts about the slow progress of the entire programme to replace Britain’s fleet of ageing reactors…. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/63f4efbe-e7b0-11e1-95e1-00144feab49a.html#axzz247TppAH8
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (301)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment