USA losing a strong advocate for nuclear safety, Gregory Jaczcko
Nuclear Power After Fukushima, May 25, 2012 The resignation of Gregory Jaczko, the embattled chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, means the country is losing a strong advocate for public safety who was always willing to challenge the nuclear industry and its political backers in Congress.
The White House’s choice to replace him, Allison Macfarlane, has strong credentials as an expert on nuclear waste and weapons. She will need to be as independent and aggressive as Dr. Jaczko. Both industry and her fellow commissioners will have to be pushed to implement necessary improvements highlighted by the disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan…..
In the wake of Fukushima, the commission assembled an expert task force. Last July, it offered a list of three dozen thoughtful recommendations. They included specific recommendations to upgrade safety equipment and procedures, as well as an ambitious call to revamp the current regulatory approach and replace certain voluntary provisions with mandatory requirements.
Dr. Jaczko’s constant prodding in public and in private helped push the commission to set clear deadlines for taking action. It gave its staff members 24 to 30 months to develop rules to prevent the complete loss of power experienced at Fukushima. And Dr. Jaczko set a goal of implementing all of the recommendations within five years. Dr. Macfarlane will have to keep pushing for prompt and thorough action.
Dr. Jaczko had been under heavy fire from fellow commissioners and Congressional Republicans for what they charged was a manipulative and abrasive management style, some of it described by the agency’s inspector general. (The Republicans have pressed for another report that may be released soon.) We’ve never been sure whether the attacks on him were mostly a cloak for policy disagreements or reflected a truly important management problem. Either way, they became a distraction…. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/26/opinion/nuclear-power-after-fukushima.html
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (268)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment