Plutonium’s deadly history
The Manhattan Project’s Fatal “Demon Core”, Physics Central, May 21, 2012 Sixty six years ago today, Louis Slotin saw a flash of blue light in the depths of Los Alamos National Laboratory. Seconds before, all that separated the young scientist from a lethal dose of radiation was a thin screwdriver.
The screwdriver supported a reflective covering that encased a sphere of plutonium, and if the reflector fell into place, a nuclear chain reaction would commence. When Slotin’s hand slipped, a lethal burst of radiation hit him, and he died nine days later.
One year later, the U.S. military detonated this plutonium “demon
core” at the Bikini Atoll in the Pacific Ocean. But the legacy of the
demon core — and its victims — has endured.
Slotin was not the demon core’s first victim before it was detonated
in the Pacific. Harry K. Daghlian Jr., another Los Alamos scientist,
died after a strikingly similar accident in 1945. Alone in the
laboratory, Daghlian was conducting an experiment on the plutonium
sphere. By itself, the sphere did not have enough mass to start a
nuclear chain reaction. With some help from a reflective material,
however, the plutonium could start such a chain reaction.
During a chain reaction, the nuclei of radioactive atoms split,
releasing neutrons. These neutrons join other atoms; these new atomic
nuclei begin splitting; and more neutrons are released. By adding a
reflective material that sends these neutrons back toward the atomic
nuclei, scientists could initiate a chain reaction with smaller
amounts of plutonium.
Daghlian was conducting tests on this phenomenon when he accidentally
dropped too much reflective material onto the plutonium, leading to a
burst of radiation that ultimately killed him 30 days later.
One year after this accident, Slotin conducted a very similar
experiment, but he had an audience. Slotin was showing his work to
several other scientists in the room while holding a hemisphere
reflective material over the top of the demon core. When the
screwdriver that supported the reflector slipped, a huge burst of
radiation was emitted.
After both of these incidents, Los Alamos forbade all related hands-on
testing, and researchers used a remote facility to control the
experiments. These early experiments highlighted the slim margins for
safety in nuclear physics…..
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (313)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment