nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

USA’s nuclear workers – cancer from radiation exposure

Christina Macpherson's websites & blogs

This article appeared today – and I thought – “Well, what’s the use of this- it is 12 years old?   Out of date news, and so forth” And then I thought -” Well, what’s happened to nuclear workers since then?”    Has it miraculously become a healthy job?  Or is it that no-one is now doing research into the health of nuclear workers?   And if not, why not?   And if research is being done into the health of nuclear workers, what are the results?     Is it all just too scary to publish?

Richard D. Miller, a policy analyst with the union, said the change was remarkable because the Energy Department and its predecessor, the Atomic Energy Commission, had ”spared no resources in seeking to defeat claims” by employees who said they had been made sick by radiation or chemicals.

higher-than-expected rates of leukemia, cancer of the lung and bladder, vision difficulties and chronic fatigue syndrome, among other health problems.

AFTER DECADES OF DENIAL (as per normal for nuke industry) . http://nuclearhistory.wordpress.com/2012/03/17/after-decades-of-denial-as-per-normal-for-nuke-industry/#comment-5284   …. Paul Langley’s Nuclear History Blog, 17 March 12, New York Times : US Govt Concedes Plutonium Workers Suffered Illness, Death   http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C05E2DE1E3CF93AA15752C0A9669C8B63&pagewanted=all

U.S. ACKNOWLEDGES RADIATION KILLED WEAPONS WORKERS , By MATTHEW L. WALD Published: January 29, 2000   WASHINGTON, Jan. 28— After decades of denials, the government is conceding that since the dawn of the atomic age, workers making nuclear weapons have been exposed to radiation and chemicals that have produced cancer and early death.

The new finding — that the exposure led to higher-than-normal rates of a wide range of cancers among workers at 14 nuclear weapons plants — raises the prospect of compensation to them. Although officials cautioned that any decision on that was a long way off, they said a package could amount to tens of millions of dollars for a group that might well include hundreds of families.

The new conclusion comes from the government’s most comprehensive review of studies of worker health and related raw health data. The review accepts the conclusion of many of those studies, some done under contract for the government, that workers were made sick by their exposure. Continue reading

March 17, 2012 Posted by | health, USA | 1 Comment

In UK, 102 business leaders urge government to back renewable energy

Sir Branson and fellow entrepreneurs ask Cameron to back renewables http://www.eaem.co.uk/news/sir-branson-and-fellow-entrepreneurs-ask-cameron-back-renewables   Energy and Envronment Magazine 16 March 2012

Sir Richard Branson is one of 102 top business signatories of an open letter to David Cameron urging him to back wind and other renewable forms of power generation.

“March’s budget provides one of the biggest opportunities to tackle climate change in the UK,” the Virgin tycoon says. “We must ensure it encourages investment rather than creates uncertainty and delays further serious investment in the renewable sector. As a country we need to be better prepared to deal with rising energy prices.”

The so-called ‘102 letter’ is conceived partly as a response to the actions of 101 backbenchers who last month wrote to the Prime Minister attacking wind power, and a call to the Treasury to re-establish a stable investment platform for renewable energy as a driver of the recovery out of the recession.

It is published on the website of the Entrepreneurs’ Organisation (EO), the global network of more than 7,500 business owners in 38 countries.

“Cutting support for green energy is a false economy,” comments Dale Vince, Founder and CEO of Ecotricity, one of Britain’s most successful new energy companies trying to muscle in on the territory controlled by the Big Six.

His angle is energy security. “Britain needs to become energy independent once more, and with the North Sea all but depleted of fossil fuels we need to look to other forms of indigenous energy. We have them in abundance, in the wind the sun and the sea, enough to power our country many times over.

“While Britain remains dependent on global energy markets, our bills can only go one way: upwards.”

His analysis is that the level of current support for green energy sources is relatively small in comparison to that for oil and gas.

In the last 12 months roughly £30 of our household energy bills has been spent on green energy support. Of this, the Renewables Obligation (RO) added just £15.15 to the annual energy bill of the United Kingdom’s 26.3 million households, with onshore wind power adding only £4.68, according to Ofgem’s recently published RO annual report for 2010/11and Ecotricity’s analysis.

The RO is the main support mechanism for encouraging the growth of renewable energy in the UK.

Meanwhile, the rising cost of imported gas added around £120 to energy bills last year, according to Ofgem’s Electricity and Gas Supply Market Report.

“We need to reverse those proportions; it’s an incredible false economy to throw money at energy market speculators while penny pinching over the one thing we can do to solve the problem long term: make our own energy,” concludes Mr Vince.

The letter says that “as entrepreneurs, investors, economists, scientists, engineers, energy providers, community builders and Members of Parliaments, we are increasingly concerned about the lack of clarity around the future of government support for land-based renewables, such as solar, wind and biogas.”

March 17, 2012 Posted by | business and costs, politics, renewable, UK | Leave a comment

Letter to UK Prime Minister David Cameron on renewable energy

Richard Branson letter to David Cameron on renewable energy http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/mar/16/renewableenergy-energy 

The letter in full from Dale Vince, Juliet Davenport and Caroline Lucas and other signatories backing green power, in response toa recent letter in which 101 Conservative backbenchers rubbished wind power

Dear David Cameron,
As entrepreneurs, investors, economists, scientists, engineers, energyproviders, community builders and Members of Parliament, we are increasingly concerned about the lack of clarity around the future of government support for land based renewables, such as solar, wind and biogas. Continue reading

March 17, 2012 Posted by | politics, renewable, UK | 1 Comment

Britain’s nuclear power industry has always failed, and will continue to fail

The nuclear industry’s history is one of broken promises. Mrs Thatcher pledged 10 new nuclear plants in 1979 – one reactor eventually sent electricity to the grid in 1995.

Britain’s existing fleet of Advanced Gas-cooled Reactors was described by the then Chairman of the Central Electricity Generating Board as the worst civil engineering disaster in our history.

The proto-type fast reactor at Dounreay is now being expensively dismantled, having never worked properly. Nor has the THORP reprocessing plant at Sellafield

Nuclear power will fail to achieve what George Monbiot wants, Guardian UK 16 Mar 12,  Nuclear industry’s broken promises show atomic energy will not help climate efforts, say former directors of Friends of the Earth Deciding on how best to meet the country’s energy needs is difficult. There are no absolutely right answers. But one issue guaranteed to excite personal passions rather than brain cells is nuclear power.

Some solutions are more convincing than others. The best make the most economic, environmental and social sense, based on facts rather than fervent beliefs.

As four former Directors of Friends of the Earth, we wrote to the Prime Minster this week setting out eight major economic and political problems facing a new build nuclear programme in the UK. We have engaged in the nuclear debate for forty years. On the basis of our experience and the evidence, we concluded that the government’s policy will fail…. Continue reading

March 17, 2012 Posted by | business and costs, UK | Leave a comment

Nuclear power revival being killed off by cheaper, safer, gas

Cheap Natural Gas Unplugs U.S. Nuclear-Power Revival, WSJ,  BY REBECCA SMITH, 16 March 12, The U.S. nuclear industry seemed to be staging a comeback several years ago, with 15 power companies proposing as many as 29 new reactors. Today, only two projects are moving off the drawing board.

What killed the revival wasn’t last year’s nuclear accident in Japan, nor was it a soft economy that dented demand for electricity. Rather, a shale-gas boom flooded the U.S. market with cheap natural gas, offering utilities a cheaper, less risky alternative to nuclear
technology.

“It’s killed off new coal and now it’s killing off new nuclear,” says David Crane, chief executive of NRG Energy Inc http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304459804577281490129153610.html

March 17, 2012 Posted by | business and costs, USA | Leave a comment

Legal challenge to India’s nuclear liability law

 “The Act channels all the liability to the nuclear operator [now the government itself], and the victims are not allowed to sue companies supplying reactors and other materials.” 

the Act was passed because the U.S., France and Russia, with which India had signed nuclear deals, pressured the government to buy expensive reactors from their suppliers.

Supreme Court to examine constitutional validity of nuclear civil liability law  THE HINDU, 17 March 12, J. VENKATESAN The Supreme Court will examine the constitutional validity of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010, which limits the liability of an operator in the event of a nuclear disaster to Rs. 1,500 crore. Continue reading

March 17, 2012 Posted by | India, Legal | Leave a comment

South Koreans becoming unsure of nuclear power safety

 SK Sees Nuclear Plant Jitters Ahead Of Summit, WSJ, March 16, 2012 A little over a week before South Korea hosts the 50-nation Nuclear Security Summit, the government is trying to reassure the public over the safety of nuclear power following a blackout at a nuclear plant on the south coast and a public backlash about alleged cover-up attempts by officials. Continue reading

March 17, 2012 Posted by | politics, South Korea | Leave a comment

Former UK Prime Minister Brown wants full cleanup of radioactivity on Scotland’s coast

Bay radiation clean-up plan agreed Google News, (UKPA) – 17 March 12, A plan has been agreed to deal with radioactive particles found on an area of Scottish coastline. The Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) and the Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) have agreed a plan to treat Dalgety Bay in Fife. “Significant” sources of radiation were discovered at the bay on the Firth of Forth coast earlier this year.

The contamination is thought to stem from residue of radium-coated instrument panels used on military aircraft which were incinerated and land-filled in the area at the end of the Second World War….

. Former prime minister Gordon Brown, who has campaigned for the bay to be cleaned up, welcomed the statement but said a timetable of action should be drawn up. Mr Brown said: “I and the community council are clear that we need a full statement of the discovery of radiation particles in the area and we need not only a plan for continuous monitoring but a plan for the removal of radioactive particles and either a sea wall or other remedial work to prevent particles causing safety fears again.
“When I meet the Secretary of State for Defence next Monday on 26th March I will be asking for a timetable for a clean-up plan for the area that can be implemented as soon as possible. This, and this alone, can lift the threat of a designation order that would label
Dalgety Bay a radiation contaminated area. None of us want this to happen and it is up to the Ministry of Defence to take action to prevent this misfortune.” http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5hvuc1afMQN0gtJUmg2Ng3wNH02TA?docId=N1157191331927522285A

March 17, 2012 Posted by | environment, UK | Leave a comment

Costly cleanup of old uranium residue

VIDEO http://www.indianasnewscenter.com/news/local/70-Years-Later-Concerns-of-Uranium-at-Fort-Wayne-Plant-142990795.html 70 Years Later, Concerns of Uranium at Fort Wayne Plant By Stephanie Parkinson March 16, 2012 FORT WAYNE, Ind. (Indiana’s NewsCenter) – A Fort Wayne steel mill is still seeing the effects of uranium used there in the 1940s.

It’s been 70 years since World War II and now the government is investigating the former Joslyn site. In 1945 the site was used to make parts for the government atomic weapons. We’ll be looking at the production facilities that were in place at the time, and trying to
find where the uranium operations took place, see if there is any obvious ground disturbances, or movement, where they disposed of uranium shavings or dust,” said William Kowalewski, Army Corps of Engineers.

The former Joslyn Plant is now Valbruna Slater Steel. Employees that work on the site now tell INC News there is a building still standing there that they are told not to go into because it was an area where they had uranium in 1940s…. Although Valbruna has told
employees the radiation from the uranium is not measurable, Kowalewski says there could be long term effects and there could also be areas that were overlooked.
“We’ve seen in the past where we might have thought that all the operations took place in a defined fence line, but when we look at the old photographs, we see impacts of some activity outside the fence line,” said Kowalewski.
The Army Corps study is being done right now. Kowalewski says once that’s done any contaminated areas will be treated or removed from the site, but that won’t happen for at least another three years because of funding and the time it takes to finish their study….

March 17, 2012 Posted by | Resources -audiovicual | 1 Comment

Bulgaria considers abandoning expensive nuclear project

Bulgaria delays Belene nuclear project, Daily Times, 17 March 12

* PM says Belene project cannot go ahead without Western investors

* Final decision on 2,000MW project likely to be delayed

SOFIA: Bulgaria will abandon plans to build a 2,000 megawatt nuclear power plant on the Danube River if it cannot attract sufficient Western funding for the 8 billion euros ($10.5 billion) project, Prime Minister Boiko Borisov said on Friday. Continue reading

March 17, 2012 Posted by | business and costs, EUROPE | Leave a comment

Czech Republic’s nuclear power plans unraveling, unaffordable

Stalemate Hits $10 Billion Czech Nuclear Plan on Funding, By Ladka Bauerova on March 15, 2012  The Czech Republic’s $10 billion plan to build two atomic reactors near the German border that could supply electricity to the Bavarian industrial heartland is unraveling over financial and pricing disputes.

CEZ AS (CEZ), Europe’s only utility with an atomic project out to bid, is beset by falling power prices and predictions that its financial muscle is too weak to safeguard investors. Continue reading

March 17, 2012 Posted by | business and costs, EUROPE | Leave a comment