Indian government’s unfair attack on 4 non government organisations (NGOs)
Govt’s attack against NGOs lopsided, Hindustan Times, 4 Mar 12, “……..The civil society uprising across India has hurt the government more than the slinging attacks from the opposition. And, the government had been looking to hit back and it did by initiating action against fourTamil Nadu based NGOs for alleged misuse of funds to stall Kudankulam nuclear plant.
Even the officials in ministry of home affairs, which monitors foreign funding to NGOs, agree that finding a clinching evidence of misuse of funds by these four NGOs will be difficult.
It all started with Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh’s statement to a US based science magazine saying “the atomic energy programme in Kudankulam has got into difficulties because these NGOs, mostly based in the United States, don’t appreciate our need to increase the energy supply.”
That was more than enough for the bureaucracy, political class and media to paint over 33,000 NGOs that receive foreign funding with the same brush.
What they have failed to reconcile is that the development NGOs, like the four in Tamil Nadu, receive negligible amount of foreign funding. The home ministry’s data shows that of Rs 11,000 crore foreign funding received by 33,000 organisations in 2009-10, the big chunk went to organizations promoting religion followed by charitable institutes. Most of the funding is through domestic contributions.
The surprising fact is the home ministry’s decision to investigate the petty money the NGOs organizing protests in Kudankulam received from foreign donors rather than looking for bigger violations under the Foreign Currency Registration Act (FCRA). The ministry does not have wherewithal to scrutinize records of all NGOs receiving money, indicating that these NGOs were the government’s target for continuing their protest at the nuclear site.
The government believes that the protests are influenced by US agencies but it has shied away from admitting to its failure to address the concerns of locals. The Nuclear Power Corporation of India recently conducted a mock drill for nuclear disaster without informing the locals, thereby creating a scare. Since then, the locals claim, voluntary contributions for the agitation has increased.
Many of those who are spearheading the movement at Kudankulam are ideologically against nuclear power, as rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, recently admitted and may not be playing directly into hands of foreign power.
Their voice can be ignored by the government in power but not crushed. It has tried to crush the dissenting view by initiating penal action against the four NGOs in Tamil Nadu and the PM going public with it…..
There appear to be double standard in the government’s policy towards NGOs. The one’s which promote government policy are liked and those who protest have to face music.
SEWA in Gujarat, which receives foreign funding, is conducting a pilot project on government’s preferred scheme of cash transfer in place of subsidised ration. Cash transfer is an idea promoted by World Bank and accepted by the government.
A large number of activists including social economist Jean Dreze are protesting against the cash transfer scheme but they are not even heard. G D Aggarwal is on a fast to protect Ganga since February 9 in Haridwar and a candle light march is held near Prime Minister’s Office every day but they have failed to stir Raisina Hills. “We don’t have any foreign funding that’s why the Prime Minister is not listening to us,” was a curt remark of social activist Madhu Kishwar, who is part of save Ganga campaign.
Like Aggarwal, hundreds of people are protesting against dams from Himachal to Arunachal but I wonder why the Home Ministry has not bothered to investigate their funding also. Why only Kudankulam? ….. Brandishing the protesting NGOs as agents of foreign powers is bad for a democracy, which needs divergent views for evolution. . http://blogs.hindustantimes.com/ecostani/2012/03/03/govts-attack-against-ngos-lopsided/
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (301)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment