USA Republican presidential candidate against supporting Israeli attack on Iran
If Israel were to conduct such an attack [on Iran] , “that’s their business, but they should suffer the consequences,” Paul continued. He added that Israel has hundreds of nuclear missiles, so “they can take care of themselves.”
Ron Paul: Why does Israel need our help? During foreign policy debate, republican presidential candidate says would not back Israeli strike on Iran. Romney: My first foreign trip as president will be to Israel to show we care about them Israel News, Yitzhak Benhorin WASHINGTON 23 Nov 11- Republican presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul suggested that the US should have less involvement in Israel‘s affairs.
I think they’re quite capable of taking care of themselves,” he said during a two-hour long foreign policy debate between eight Republican presidential hopefuls at Constitution Hall in Washington overnight Wednesday (Israel time).
The comment came in response to a question about whether the Republican candidates would, if elected president, back Israel in a strike against Iran‘s nuclear facilities.
Paul said that in the event of an Israeli strike, “Why does Israel need our help? We need to get out of their way.”
The United States sends roughly $3 billion to Israel in military aid every year.
If Israel were to conduct such an attack, “that’s their business, but they should suffer the consequences,” Paul continued. He added that Israel has hundreds of nuclear missiles, so “they can take care of themselves.”
“We don’t even have a treaty with Israel. Why do we have this automatic commitment that we’re going to send our kids and send our money endlessly to Israel? So I think they’re quite capable of taking care of themselves,” Paul added.
Addressing the possibility of an attack on Iran, the candidate said “I don’t expect it to happen, because, you know, the Mossad leader that just retired said it would be the stupidest thing to do in the world. And it’s a big argument over in Israel. They’re not about to do this.”
Credible plan
Businessman Herman Cain, on his part, said he would help Israel in such an attack “if the mission and the plan were clear.”
“If Israel had a credible plan that it appeared as if they could succeed, I would support Israel, yes,” he said. “And in some instances, depending upon how strong the plan is, we would join with Israel for that, if it was clear what the mission was and it was clear what the definition of victory was.”…
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4151970,00.html
WASHINGTON – Republican presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul suggested that the US should have less involvement in Israel‘s affairs.
“I think they’re quite capable of taking care of themselves,” he said during a two-hour long foreign policy debate between eight Republican presidential hopefuls at Constitution Hall in Washington overnight Wednesday (Israel time).
The comment came in response to a question about whether the Republican candidates would, if elected president, back Israel in a strike against Iran‘s nuclear facilities.
Paul said that in the event of an Israeli strike, “Why does Israel need our help? We need to get out of their way.”
The United States sends roughly $3 billion to Israel in military aid every year.
If Israel were to conduct such an attack, “that’s their business, but they should suffer the consequences,” Paul continued. He added that Israel has hundreds of nuclear missiles, so “they can take care of themselves.”
“We don’t even have a treaty with Israel. Why do we have this automatic commitment that we’re going to send our kids and send our money endlessly to Israel? So I think they’re quite capable of taking care of themselves,” Paul added.
Addressing the possibility of an attack on Iran, the candidate said “I don’t expect it to happen, because, you know, the Mossad leader that just retired said it would be the stupidest thing to do in the world. And it’s a big argument over in Israel. They’re not about to do this.”
Credible planBusinessman Herman Cain, on his part, said he would help Israel in such an attack “if the mission and the plan were clear.”
“If Israel had a credible plan that it appeared as if they could succeed, I would support Israel, yes,” he said. “And in some instances, depending upon how strong the plan is, we would join with Israel for that, if it was clear what the mission was and it was clear what the definition of victory was.”… |
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- January 2026 (259)
- December 2025 (358)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (376)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS





Leave a comment