In Washington, huge and costly lobbying by nuclear company Entergy
glimpses into Entergy’s extensive lobbying efforts in Washington.
It’s impossible to tell how much Entergy spent on its efforts to try to get the NRC and Justice Department to intervene in the Vermont Yankee case
Entergy Services reported spending $670,000 on lobbying in the second quarter of this year, when the question of government intervention in the Vermont Yankee case was most in play, and that Entergy Nuclear Northeast, another company unit, spent $90,000…..
The reports do not include money the company spent on lawyers involved in the Vermont Yankee matter; the documents indicate that involvement was extensive…..
Documents show heavy Entergy lobbying on Vt. nuke, Boston.com By Dave Gram, Associated Press / November 6, 2011 MONTPELIER, Vt.—Entergy Corp. heavily lobbied multiple federal agencies last spring as it unsuccessfully pleaded with them to join its lawsuit against the state of Vermont’s efforts to close the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant, internal Nuclear Regulatory Commission documents show.
The emails, letters and other documents, obtained from the NRC by The Associated Press after a Freedom of Information Act request, also show NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko being coached by the agency’s lawyers to scale back remarks he had been making saying the agency was unlikely to intervene in the Entergy lawsuit.
And they indicate the NRC’s five commissioners at least planned to meet with Entergy representatives in early June, something they told a U.S. Senate committee later that month they decided not to do, citing the agency’s involvement in the lawsuit.
In the end, Entergy’s lobbying met with limited success. A three-day trial in Vermont Yankee’s lawsuit against the state, held last month in U.S. District Court in Brattleboro, saw no formal intervention by the NRC or the U.S. Justice Department. Judge J. Garvan Murtha has yet to issue a decision in the suit.
But the NRC documents — most of them whited out under claims by the agency that they are exempt from public disclosure — provide glimpses into Entergy’s extensive lobbying efforts in Washington.
A central issue in the Vermont Yankee case is whether the state is pre-empted by federal law from requiring that the Vernon reactor shut down when its initial 40-year license expires next March. The NRC announced in March of this year that it would grant Vermont Yankee a 20-year license extension.
Vermont is the only state in the country with a law requiring state lawmakers’ approval for a nuclear plant’s license extension. The Senate voted 26-4 in 2010 against continued operation; the House hasn’t acted.
A month after it got the NRC license extension, Entergy filed suit in U.S. District Court against the state, saying the state’s reasons for wanting its lone reactor had mainly to do with safety, which falls under the NRC’s sole jurisdiction.
State officials have maintained they have other concerns, including Vermont Yankee’s reliability and its effects on the Vermont energy economy, saying the plant’s presence has slowed the development of alternative, renewable power……
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., a member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said in an interview that his office learned the lobbying was successful with the NRC; less so with the Department of Justice. Sanders said NRC commissioners voted 3-2 on June 15 to ask for the Justice Department’s OK to intervene in the Vermont Yankee case.
NRC officials said the commission’s votes on legal strategy are secret and refused to comment on Sanders’ statements. The Justice Department also declined comment.
It’s impossible to tell how much Entergy spent on its efforts to try to get the NRC and Justice Department to intervene in the Vermont Yankee case. But lobbyist disclosure filings included in a U.S. Senate database shed some light on the extent to which the company tried to influence the federal government on a variety of issues. Entergy Services reported spending $670,000 on lobbying in the second quarter of this year, when the question of government intervention in the Vermont Yankee case was most in play, and that Entergy Nuclear Northeast, another company unit, spent $90,000…..
The reports do not include money the company spent on lawyers involved in the Vermont Yankee matter; the documents indicate that involvement was extensive…..
Sanders said in an interview the stakes were large. “What we have here in Entergy is an enormously large and powerful energy company (that) has wanted the NRC to urge the Department of Justice to intervene in this case, which would have been very, very significant.”
Sanders said the Vermont case is being watched closely around the country because it could mark the first time a U.S. nuclear plant had been closed against its owners’ wishes.![]()
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- January 2026 (106)
- December 2025 (358)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



Leave a comment