Darlington nuclear review unsatisfactory, – more study needed
Court asked to order Darlington nuclear review, The Star.com John Spears, 29 Swept 11, A federal panel failed to complete the job of reviewing the environmental impact of new reactors at the Darlington nuclear station, four environmental groups have told a court.
As a result, no further permission should be granted toward letting the project continue until the panel finishes its job, the groups ask. They’ve filed an application with federal court, seeking an order sending the issue back to the review panel. The panel filed a report in August, following several weeks of hearing last spring, allowing work on the reactors to proceed if certain conditions are met.
“The review of the environmental impacts of building new reactors at Darlington has ignored many of nuclear power’s risks and costs,” Shawn-Patrick Stensil of Greenpeace told a news conference Thursday.
“It has also ignored consideration of safer and cheaper alternatives.”
Greenpeace has joined in the application with Lake Ontario Waterkeeper, Northwatch and the Canadian Environmental Law Association.
The federal panel, headed by former New Brunswick cabinet minister Allan Graham, held its hearings shortly after the nuclear crisis erupted at Japan’s Fukushima reactor following an earthquake and tsunami.
Those events unlined the “catastrophic risks” inherent in nuclear energy, said Stensil.
Richard Lindgren of the environmental law association said that Ontario Power Generation, which will run the reactors, doesn’t know who they’ll hire to build them, or what technology they’ll use.
“How can you meaningfully evaluate the environmental impact when you don’t know what the reactor is going to be?” he asked….
http://www.thestar.com/business/article/1061954–court-asked-to-order-darlington-nuclear-review
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (293)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment