US NRC had to admit safety problems with new Westinghouse nuclear reactor
Another nail in the coffin for the “nuclear renaissance” Greenpeace by Jarred Cobb – May 23, 2011 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) released a statement on Friday about the new Westinghouse AP1000 nuclear reactor. In the grand tradition of breaking bad news on a Friday, the NRC was trying to bury a significant blow to the so-called “nuclear renaissance.” After a review of the Toshiba-designed reactor, the NRC found: “more problems regarding the AP1000’s shield building, as well as the peak accident pressures expected within containment.”
This news will further delay the construction of new nuclear reactors in the United States. Southern Company has already dug a big hole in the ground for two AP1000 reactors in Georgia, which is only possible because of an $8.3 billion taxpayer-funded loan guarantee from the Department of Energy. Further construction will now have to wait for additional review of the design.
The AP1000 is supposed to be the backbone of the “nuclear renaissance,” and this is only the latest problem with the reactor design. Last year, a former nuclear executive and 39-year industry veteran released an analysis showing that the likelihood of a hole in the steel containment dome is much greater in the AP1000 design than current reactors. If that happened, which is not uncommon given that there have been 80 documented problems with containment systems in the U.S., radiation could be released far and wide through a chimney effect.
The design of new nuclear reactors is flawed. A majority of Americans oppose taxpayer-funded reactor construction. Wall Street also refuses to back it. And, the Fukushimacatastrophe has reminded us that nuclear power is an inherently dangerous technology…..Tell Congress that taxpayers should not take on the risk of building new nuclear reactors.http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/news-and-blogs/campaign-blog/another-nail-in-the-coffin-for-the-nuclear-re/blog/34898
Read more: NRC puts hold on Westinghouse reactor approval | Charlotte Business Journal
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (313)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment