Not all nuclear accidents have been rated on the scale
Some of the events on this list predate the scale and do not appear to have been rated. They are listed by Mr. Cochran in chronological order.
Keeping Score on Nuclear Accidents – NYTimes.com, Matthew Wald 12 April 11, Now that Japan has raised its assessment of the Fukushima accident to a 7 on the International Atomic Energy Agency’s scale, equal to the 1986 accident at Chernobyl, it may be time to review past accidents. Thomas B. Cochran, a physicist at the Natural Resources Defense Council, just did that in preparing to testify on Tuesday afternoon before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
Some of the incidents that he lists are technically not meltdowns but rather “core damage accidents.” That term is used when an intact core holds in nearly all of the radioactive materials that are created by a reactor as it splits atoms of uranium and plutonium, leaving behind fragment atoms of materials like cesium, strontium and iodine, which seek to return to stability by giving off radiation. If the core melts, as it did at Fukushima, or explodes, as it did at Chernobyl, that radioactive material is released.
The seven-level scale for the seriousness of the accidents runs from “anomaly,” something that would probably not be mentioned in a newspaper, to “incident,” which might be, to an event with major off-site consequences for health and the environment, like Chernobyl or Fukushima. Some do not involve reactors: Japan, for example, experienced an accident in 1999 at a plant that processes plutonium fuel. The plutonium was stored in a liquid in a vessel that was too large, inadvertently creating a “critical mass,” an amount capable of sustaining a chain reaction. The chain reaction created a shower of radiation and heat, blowing apart the critical mass, but as it cooled, it re-assembled. That rated a level 4.
In fact, the International Atomic Energy Agency pointed out a few hours after Japan announced the 7 rating on Tuesday, the 7 applies to reactors 1, 2 and 3 at Fukushima Daiichi. The accident at Unit 4 is not in the reactor but in the spent fuel pool and is still rated at 5.
Some of the events on this list predate the scale and do not appear to have been rated. They are listed by Mr. Cochran in chronological order.:
1. Sodium Reactor Experiment (SER)
Location: Santa Susana Field Laboratory, California, United States………
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (293)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment