Economics of nuclear power make its future dubious
"Public opinion, which is fairly important both for finance and the politics underlying nuclear, has moved very rapidly ...from favoring nuclear power in the United States ... to being decidedly opposed,"![]()
Odds against new US nuclear plants-finance lawyer Reuters By Roberta RamptonMar 28, 2011
Plants too expensive, even before Japan disaster-lawyer
* Likelihood of new US plant soon "exceedingly remote"* Couldn't have happened at worse time for India projectsWASHINGTON, March 28 (Reuters) - Public fears about nuclear safety stacked up on untenable economics make it unlikely that any new nuclear reactors will be built in the United States in the next several years, a lawyer who specializes in energy project financing said on Monday.Even if public opinion were to "snap back" after the emergency at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi plant -- the world's worst atomic crisis in 25 years -- nuclear plants cost too much to build, even with government loan guarantees, said Irving Rotter, a partner with New York law firm Sidley Austin."The likelihood that the United States will have a nuclear
reactor within the next several years is exceedingly remote -- it was as exceedingly remote before the incident in Japan," Rotter told a nuclear policy conference held by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Long before the Japanese plant was battered by an earthquake and tsunami earlier this month, natural gas was a far cheaper fuel source for electricity in the United States. [ID:nN24139785]...LOAN GUARANTEES COME WITH A COSTThe Obama administration offered loan guarantees to help
secure financing, but the cost of the terms was extraordinarily high, Rotter said, pointing to the failure of a deal for a nuclear reactor in Maryland as an example. [ID:nN09265747]"Public opinion, which is fairly important both for finance
and the politics underlying nuclear, has moved very rapidly ...
from favoring nuclear power in the United States ... to being decidedly opposed," Rotter said.....
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (293)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



Leave a comment