nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

Nuclear reactors are simply too dangerous

In 1965 Dr Edward Teller stated, “In principle, nuclear reactors are dangerous… In my mind, nuclear reactors do not belong on the surface of the earth.

Nuclear Power Reactors Do Not Belong on the Surface of the Earth, THE HUFFINGTON POST, Sheldon Filger, 17 March 11,  “………..In 1956, the Director of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Alvin Weinberg, said that, “there is an understandable drive on the part of men of good will to build up the positive aspects of nuclear energy simply because the negative aspects are so distressing.” His point underscored a perception by many of the leading scientific minds involved in the creation of the nuclear arsenal and militarized nuclear reactors to provide propulsion for the submarines carrying the nuclear tipped missiles that comprised the ultimate deterrent of the major powers. While supporting and contributing towards making nuclear power and atomic weapons available to military forces highly disciplined and skillfully trained in their maintenance, they harbored great reluctance to see this technology disseminated freely throughout the civilian economy. The risks of such technology being managed by civilian organizations, especially privately-owned utilities, were far too grave, in their estimation.

The uranium 235 fuel utilized in a nuclear reactor is enriched to 20 percent, unlike nuclear weapons, which require a minimum of 80 percent enrichment. This means that in an accident, an atomic detonation would not occur. However, virtually all the other evil consequences of a nuclear blast can occur in a catastrophic accident involving a nuclear power reactor. A plethora of toxic radioactive isotopes, some with a highly persistent half-life, are released into the atmosphere, soil and aquifers of surrounding areas, with frightful consequences for human beings.

The economic damage resulting from widespread nuclear contamination can also be severe and long-lasting. In effect, a nuclear power reactor located within twenty or thirty kilometers of a major population center is the ultimate radiological bomb. Its promise of cheap, safe and supposedly clean electricity exists only in a parallel universe, where human failings and mistakes do not occur, terrorism is non-existent and natural disasters such as earthquakes and tsunamis do not happen. In our world, such a promise is illusory, as already demonstrated in the past at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, and now so terrifyingly underway in Japan.

Dr. Edward Teller was the inventor of America’s hydrogen bomb, a weapon thousands of times more devastating than the atomic bomb that destroyed Hiroshima. He was politically a rightwing hawk during the Cold War, and strongly supported the buildup of America’s nuclear arsenal, including the development of nuclear reactors for military purposes. However, this genius of nuclear physics had a far different view when it came to building nuclear reactors as a means of generating electricity for widespread civilian use. In 1965 Teller stated, “In principle, nuclear reactors are dangerous… In my mind, nuclear reactors do not belong on the surface of the earth.”

Sheldon Filger: Nuclear Power Reactors Do Not Belong on the Surface of the Earth

March 17, 2011 - Posted by | general

1 Comment »

  1. The Enrico Fermi Award is an award honoring scientists of international stature for their lifetime achievement in the development, use, or production of energy. 1980 – Alvin M. Weinberg.

    Does this man know what he’s talking about? I think so! Weinberg was Director of ORNL,and invented and held the patents on the Light Water Reactor (LWR), of which the Pressurised Water Reactor (PWR) is one version; Fukushima plants are the Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) version of LWRs. He was against the civil use of LWRs, because he, more than anybody, was aware of their safety fallabilities. His attempts to promote the Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor (LFTR) for civil use were politically and militarily blocked. To his dying day, he never changed his mind that, because LFTRs burned thorium so efficiently and that there is sufficient thorium to provide power for tens of thousands of years, humankind’s whole future depended on LFTRs

    In his autobiography Weinberg confessed:
    “I became obsessed with the idea that humankind’s whole future depended on the breeder. For Society generally to achieve and maintain a standard of living of today’s developed countries depends on the availability of relatively cheap, inexhaustible sources of energy.”

    When he says ‘breeder’, he’s talking about the ability of LFTRs to transmute thorium to fissile U233.

    I blog on LFTRs in the UK. Google: “LFTRs to Power the Planet”

    Colin Megson's avatar Comment by Colin Megson | March 20, 2011 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.