Even a ‘limited’ nuclear war would bring immediate global climate change
Increased levels of UV radiation from the sun could persist for years, possibly with a drastic impact on humans and the environment, even thousands of miles from the area of the nuclear conflict.
“A regional nuclear exchange of 100 15-kiloton weapons … would produce unprecedented low-ozone columns over populated areas in conjunction with the coldest surface temperatures experienced in the last 1,000 years, and would likely result in a global nuclear famine,”
Limited Nuclear War Could Deplete Ozone Layer, Increasing Radiation, NTI: Global Security Newswire , By Chris Schneidmiller, 25 Feb 2011, WASHINGTON — A nuclear conflict involving as few as 100 weapons could produce long-term damage to the ozone layer, enabling higher than “extreme” levels of ultraviolet radiation to reach the Earth’s surface, new research indicates (see GSN, March 16, 2010).
Increased levels of UV radiation from the sun could persist for years, possibly with a drastic impact on humans and the environment, even thousands of miles from the area of the nuclear conflict.
“A regional nuclear exchange of 100 15-kiloton weapons … would produce unprecedented low-ozone columns over populated areas in conjunction with the coldest surface temperatures experienced in the last 1,000 years, and would likely result in a global nuclear famine,” according to a presentation delivered on Friday at a major science conference in Washington.
Today, there are five recognized nuclear powers — China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. India, Israel and Pakistan are all known or widely assumed to hold nuclear weapons, while North Korea has a deterrent of undetermined capability and there are concerns about the atomic intent of nations such as Iran.
The global nuclear stockpile is believed to exceed 20,000 weapons, most of which are in U.S. and Russian hands, according to the Federation of American Scientists.
While the potential for a Cold War-size nuclear war has receded in recent decades, tensions in regions such as South Asia and the Korean Peninsula suggest that the danger of an atomic detonation cannot be dismissed.
The threat of long-term effects of such an event beyond the immediate death and destruction — including nuclear winter, the deep reduction in surface temperatures produced by the release of massive amounts of smoke into the atmosphere — has been recognized for decades.
Research backed by computer models in the last few years has indicated that fires ignited by the exchange of 100 nuclear weapons similar in power to the bomb dropped on Hiroshima during World War II would release millions of metric tons of soot into the atmosphere. That would speed up the pace at which ozone is eliminated in the stratosphere, according to the National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Center scientist Michael Mills likened the effects of a nuclear strike to the firestorms touched off by the mass conventional bombings of Dresden and Tokyo during the war.
“They just start feeding and create their own weather system from the flames and turn the whole city into this black carbon smoke,” he told Global Security Newswire yesterday.
The research by Mills and colleagues was the first to address the possibility that a nuclear explosion could lead to increased ultraviolet radiation levels on Earth, according to a NCAR press release issued during the American Association for the Advancement of Science conference.
The ozone gas layer limits exposure to UV radiation that at elevated levels has been linked to vision impairment and skin cancer in humans. That radiation can also produce “far-reaching impacts” on plant and animal life, along with the agricultural and marine sectors, the release states…….“We still have many, many more than are needed to destroy the world many times over,” Mills said. “How many do you need to deter an enemy? Just 100 would produce an ecological catastrophe.”
NTI: Global Security Newswire – Limited Nuclear War Could Deplete Ozone Layer, Increasing Radiation
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (293)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS




Leave a comment