UK wanting to increase nuclear operators’ liability for accidents
no company can obtain insurance against a nuclear accident – or would want to shoulder the risk themselves – because the costs could potentially be limitless.
Nuclear power generators will face £1bn in clean-up costs after an accident At present any operator of a nuclear site only has to pay the first £140m towards clean-up costs with the taxpayer contributing the Guardian UK, Tim Webb , 23 January 2011
Nuclear operators will have to pay the first £1bn towards the cost of any accident in the UK – seven times more than the current cap on their liabilities – the government will propose tomorrow.
Energy secretary Chris Huhne told the Observer that he wanted to introduce the new rule to ensure that there would be no public subsidy for nuclear power.
Currently, any operator of a nuclear site only has to pay the first £140m towards clean-up costs, with the taxpayer contributing the rest.
The cap, enshrined in European treaties, was introduced because no company can obtain insurance against a nuclear accident – or would want to shoulder the risk themselves – because the costs could potentially be limitless.
Many environmentalists argue that agreeing to cover any costs above £140m amounts to a public subsidy, which the Conservative and Liberal Democrats have promised not to provide to the industry…………..
Under the European proposals, in future nuclear operators must pay a minimum of the first €700m (£590m) for any accident. Governments have the option of adding a maximum of an extra €500m towards companies’ liabilities. Huhne is proposing to load the maximum liability onto companies that is allowed under the new treaties.
The cost of constructing nuclear reactors has soared, and companies have threatened to build them elsewhere if the UK government does not introduce the right regulatory breaks to make them economic. Many environmentalists believe the support on offer – guarantees of a minimum carbon price, caps on nuclear waste liabilities and a possible new “low-carbon obligation” which would guarantee a higher price for the electricity reactors generate – are forms of public subsidies…….
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (277)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



Leave a comment