Report shows renewable energy cheaper for USA Southern states
the Southern U.S. has extensive renewable energy resources and they can be developed more economically than many people suppose.
South could use more wind energy, pay less, REVE 8 Jan 2011, Southern states could generate 30 percent of their electricity from renewable energy sources such as wind power, solar energy and biomass by 2030 (up from four percent today) while saving millions of dollars, according to a study, “Renewable Energy in the South,” released in mid-December by researchers from the Georgia Institute of Technology and Duke University.
“While the South enjoys some of the lowest electricity rates in the country, there is resistance to developing new technologies that seem much more costly than coal based electricity,” said Etan Gumerman of Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions and a co-lead researcher on the study. “In reality, that’s not the case.”According to the report’s Executive Summary:
“Policy makers in some Southern states oppose renewable electricity standards because they believe their renewable resources are insufficient. The purpose of this report is to provide an up- to-date assessment of the economic potential for expanding renewable electricity generation in the South …
“The expanded tax credits, technology improvements, and updated renewable resource estimates that comprise the Expanded Renewables¡¬ scenario would have favorable impacts on electricity rates and utility bills. … [A]verage electricity rates in the South are forecast to rise for all users by 23% in the EIA Reference case (from 7.9 cents/kWh in 2010 to 9.7 cents/kWh in 2030). In contrast, the average electricity rate in the region in the Expanded Renewables scenario would rise by only 16% over the two decades, to 9.0 cents/kWh.”
There’s more–a lot more (190 pages)–but the bottom line is expressed above: the Southern U.S. has extensive renewable energy resources and they can be developed more economically than many people suppose.
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (358)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



Leave a comment