Avoid radiation “backscatter” airport scanning
There are two types of scanners. The millimetre wave machine (left) is
safe, creating an image of the body by using electromagnetic waves. The other, “backscatter” devices, )right) use low-energy X-rays to produce a picture of the body. These are not so safe…………
Doctor advises travellers to avoid being X-rayed Pat-downs far healthier choice, The Vancouver Sun, By Dr. W. Gifford Jones, Special to the Windsor Star January 6, 2011 The U.S. is replacing many metal detectors with more sophisticated equipment, better described as personal exposure devices. In effect, the technology can detect articles beneath the clothing along with you-know-what — and this infuriates many travellers.
There are two types of scanners. The millimetre wave machine is safe, creating an image of the body by using electromagnetic waves. The other, “backscatter” devices, use low-energy X-rays to produce a picture of the body. These are not so safe…………
As you might expect, the U.S. government says that the amount of radiation exposure is minimal. It claims the amount the body receives is the same as natural radiation exposure from two minutes of flying. But some authorities believe the radiation dose is higher.
Experts say backscatter machines use low-energy X-rays. This means that “MOST” of the radiation is absorbed by the skin and, unlike medical X-rays, does not enter the body. This does not reassure me one bit. And since it’s absorbed by the skin, will it cause skin cancer years from now?…….My advice is to forget Victorian modesty. Rather, avoid radiation like the plague. Remember: a small hole can sink a large ship. Too many bits of a “little radiation” can produce long-term health risks. Take the pat-down every time.
1 Comment »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- December 2025 (358)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS




I prefer to be safe too, after all the real experts on the subject say there is no such thing as a safe dose of radiation. All doses are cumulative.