Western powers now hoping that poverty will stop Iran’s nukes
The theory now is that rather than leading directly to a change of policy, the effect of the latest sanctions package will be to underline the cost of maintaining the nuclear programme. The positive message is that compliance with international demands would mean a scramble for western investment
Ahmadinejad may have to choose between uranium and butter, guardian.co.uk, Ian Black, 9 June 2010, Iranian president faces having to raid the coffers to fund his nuclear ambitions, but how will the jobless and hungry react? Iran‘s economy is in serious trouble even without new UN sanctions — and western governments are hoping the new burdens being imposed on the Islamic republic will at least raise the cost of maintaining its nuclear programme.
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has insisted Iran will not bow to pressure, but he is facing low or zero growth, rising unemployment, high inflation and, crucially, reduced earnings from the hugely dominant oil and gas sector, the source of 80% of all state revenues. Oil prices are down 16% from this year’s peak, reducing the regime’s ability to buy support………….
No one expects the economy to collapse but the sanctions are likely to have a psychological impact,………..Of Iran’s 73 million people, more than 10 million live in “absolute” poverty and another 30 million in “relative” poverty, according to Iran’s statistics agency…………..
The resolution calls for measures against new Iranian banks abroad if a connection to nuclear or missile programmes is suspected, as well as “vigilance” over transactions with any Iranian bank…………The theory now is that rather than leading directly to a change of policy, the effect of the latest sanctions package will be to underline the cost of maintaining the nuclear programme. The positive message is that compliance with international demands would mean a scramble for western investment — as experienced by Libya after it came in from the cold after giving up support for terrorism and closing down its nuclear programme in 2003.
Ahmadinejad may have to choose between uranium and butter | World news | guardian.co.uk
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- January 2026 (106)
- December 2025 (358)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



Leave a comment